Cover not available
Part of
(Non)referentiality in Conversation
Edited by Michael C. Ewing and Ritva Laury
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 344] 2024
► pp. 11–34

Chapter 2
Elusive referentiality and allusive reference in Indonesian conversation

| The University of Melbourne

This chapter examines referential practices in a corpus of colloquial Indonesian conversation and attempts to address the question: “Does referentiality matter to speakers?” I take referentiality to be a multi-dimensional phenomenon involving (at least) whether referents are construed as general or particular and whether they are tracked through discourse. Through close examination of excerpts from conversational interaction, I show that there is often a blurring between the general and the particular, that referents are often indeterminate, and that referentiality as a discrete and classifiable linguistic property often does not seem to be relevant to participants in ongoing interaction. In this sense, referentiality does not always appear to matter to speakers. At the same time, referential practices do appear to be exploitable by speakers as resources for social action. Specifically, I show that a shift in referential practices regularly coincides with a shift in alignment, understood in terms of footing. These may involve shifts between generalising and exemplifying or moving from narratorial to quoted speech. To the extent that shifts in referentiality coincide with shifts in footing, then it can be said that referentiality does matter to speakers.

Keywords: interactional linguistics, referentiality, conversation, Indonesian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.The data
  • 4.Allusive reference and indeterminacy
    • 4.1Indeterminate particular reference
    • 4.2Indeterminate reference in sequence
    • 4.3Referential fluidity
  • 5.Changes in referentiality and footing with explicit reference
    • 5.1General to particular reference and change of footing
    • 5.2Change of footing through fluid generality
  • 6.Discussion: Referentiality, indeterminacy, and social action
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Chen, Ping
2009 “Aspects of Referentiality.” Journal of Pragmatics 41, 1657–1674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djenar, Dwi Noverini, Michael C. Ewing and Howard Manns
2018 Style and Intersubjectivity in Youth Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donnellan, Keith
1966 “Reference and Definite Descriptions.” In Semantics, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits, 100–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1980 “Beyond Definiteness: The Trace of Identity in Discourse.” In The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, 203–274. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. and Sandra A. Thompson
1991 “Dimensions of a Theory of Information Flow.” Unpublished Ms. University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ewing, Michael C.
2005 “Colloquial Indonesian.” In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, ed. by Alexander Adelaar and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, 227–258. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
2014 “Motivations for First and Second Person Subject Expression and Ellipsis in Javanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 63: 48–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Kalau Framing Construction in Indonesian Comics.” NUSA: Linguistic Studies of Languages in and around Indonesia 58: 51–72.Google Scholar
2019 “The Predicate as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction in Colloquial Indonesian.” Studies in Language 43 (2): 402–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ewing, Michael C., and Dwi Noverini Djenar
2019 “Address, Reference and Sequentiality in Indonesian Conversation.” The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A Comparative Approach, ed. by Paul Bouissac, 253–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
1994 “Contextualization, Indexicality, and the Distributed Nature of Grammar.” Language Sciences 16 (1): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlieb
1892 “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100 (1892): 25–50.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 “Footing.” In Forms of Talk, ed. by Erving Goffman, 124–159. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1983 “Felicity’s Condition.” American Journal of Sociology 89 (1): 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K.
2010 “Reference and Accessibility from a Givenness Hierarchy Perspective.” International Review of Pragmatics 2: 148–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski
1993 “Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse.” Language 69 (2): 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagaya, Naonori
2011 “Rise and Fall of Referentiality: Articles in Philippine Languages.” In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, ed. by Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta and Janick Wrona, 549–626. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nariyama, Shigeko
2003 Ellipsis and Referent Tracking in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, Sun-Young
2007 “Overt Reference to Speaker and Recipient in Korean.” Discourse Studies 9 (4): 462–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi and Ryoko Suzuki
2020 “Exploration into a New Understanding of ‘Zero Anaphora’ in Japanese Everyday Talk.” In Fixed Expressions: Building Language Structure and Social Action, ed. by Ritva Laury and Tsuyoshi Ono, 41–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson
1997 “Deconstructing ‘Zero Anaphora’ in Japanese.” Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure (1997): 481–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1905 “On Denoting.” Mind 14 (56): 479–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, James N.
2006 Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1950 “On Referring.” Mind 59: 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wouk, Fay
1999 “Gender and the Use of Pragmatic Particles in Indonesian.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 3 (2): 194–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Solidarity in Indonesian Conversation: The Discourse Marker ya.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (2): 171–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar