Evaluation as a persuasive tactic in the 2012 Obama-Romney
debates
The focus of this article is the deictic evaluative
construction that’s, as used by Barack Obama and Mitt
Romney during the 2012 presidential debates. A summative clause, often
toward the end of a discourse turn, opened by the distal demonstrative
pronoun that, has a persuasive function, evaluating the
immediately preceding discourse content. This construction allows the
speaker to evaluate his own message positively and the opponent’s message
negatively; it also structures the content clearly and concisely, helping to
portray the speaker as one with a strong and clear agenda. A quantitative
comparison of the usage of the that’s construction with
regard to Obama and Romney shows that both used it equally during the first
debate; however, in the second debate, Obama doubled its use. This chapter
brings together a concept from narrative theory (evaluation) and a concept
from rhetoric (the persuasive function of language), as these two concepts
intersect within the persuasive genre of presidential debates.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.That’s as part of an evaluation for a persuasive
purpose
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Summarizing and structuring
- 4.2Underscoring the reasons: That’s why
- 4.3Pathways to goals: That’s how
- 4.4The negative that’s not
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References