Chapter 8
Planet in danger! Climate emotions in English
A cultural pragmatics study of eco-anxiety, grief and
distress
People can respond to the planet in danger through emotions. In English, some of the most common emotional
reactions to the climate crisis have been labelled with terms such as eco-anxiety, climate
grief and ecological distress. This chapter takes the popular, rather than academic, reception
of these emotion terms based on a collection of English-language podcasts. As a cultural pragmatics study, its method is
semantically-enhanced discourse studies, which draws on natural semantic metalanguage (NSM) approach. Through examination of
popular discussions of climate emotions, which show some diversity of opinion, the chapter moves to put forward an emotion
model for overarching relevant ecological feelings and an action model for a typical motivation of School Strikers. These
models constitute two innovative representations arising from semantically-enhanced discourse studies. The chapter ends with
some proposals for how to study the pragmatics of emotions and how to work with novel, often environmental, vocabulary for
which fixed senses have not settled.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodological frames
- 3.In search of words
- 3.1Reification
- 3.2Experience-near, experience distant
- 3.3Anxiety or grief
- 4.An emotion model
- 5.Action model for School Strikers
- 6.Concluding remarks
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (28)
References
Andrews, Avery. 2016. “Reconciling
NSM and formal semantics.” Australian Journal of
Linguistics 36 (1): 79–111.
Bradley, Graham, Sameer Deshpande, Kerrie Foxwell-Norton, Natasha Hennessey, and Melissa Jackson. 2022. Griffith
Climate Action Survey: Summary for policy and decision making. Griffith University, QLD, Australia.
Bromhead, Helen. 2021. “Disaster
linguistics, climate change semantics and public discourse studies: a semantically-enhanced discourse study of 2011
Queensland Floods.” Language
Sciences 85: 101381.
Bromhead, Helen. 2022. “Tensions
in talking about disasters: Habitual versus climate-informed – The case of bushfire vocabulary in
Australia.” Australian Journal of
Linguistics 42 (3–4): 207–225.
Bromhead, Helen, and Carsten Levisen. 2022. “Environmental
semantics.” Scandinavian Studies in
Language 13 (1): 78–87. [URL].
Budziszewska, Magdalena, and Sofia Elisabet Jonsson. (2020). “From
climate anxiety to climate action: An existential perspective on climate change concerns within
psychotherapy.” Journal of Humanistic
Psychology: 0022167821993243.
Carbaugh, Donal, and Michael Berry. 2017. Reporting
Cultures on 60 Minutes: Missing the Finnish Line in an American Newscast. New York: Routledge.
Carbaugh, Donal, and Tovar Cerulli. 2013. “Cultural
discourses of dwelling: Investigating environmental communication as a place-based
practice.” Environmental Communication: A journal of Nature and
Culture 7 (1): 4–23.
Clayton, Susan, and Bryan T. Karazsia. 2020. “Development
and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety.” Journal of Environmental
Psychology 69: 101434.
Cunsolo, Ashlee, and Neville R. Ellis. 2018. “Ecological
grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss.” Nature Climate
Change 8 (4): 275–281.
Goddard, Cliff (ed.). 2021. Minimal
Languages in
Action. London: Palgrave.
Goddard, Cliff. 2022. “Vocabulary
of emotions and its development in English, German and other
languages.” In Handbook on Language and
Emotion, vol. 1, ed.
by Gesine Lenore Schiewer, Jeanette Altarriba, and Bee Chin Ng, 511–531. Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton.
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka. 2014. Words
and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages, and
Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ojala, Maria, Ashlee Cunsolo, Charles A. Ogunbode, and Jacqueline Middleton. 2021. “Anxiety,
worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative
review.” Annual Review of Environment and
Resources 46 (1): 35–58.
Pihkala, Panu. 2019. Climate
Anxiety. Helsinki: MIELI Mental Health Finland.
Pihkala, Panu. 2020. “Anxiety
and the ecological crisis: An Analysis of eco-anxiety and climate
anxiety.” Sustainability 12 (19): 7836.
Shire, Warsan. 2015. “What
They Did Yesterday Afternoon.” Verse. [URL].
Terkourafi, Marina. 2021. “Pragmatics
as an interdisciplinary field.” Journal of
Pragmatics 179: 77–84.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. “Multidisciplinary CDA:
a plea for diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage.
Wardell, Susan. 2020. “Naming
and framing ecological distress.” Medicine Anthropology
Theory 7 (2), 187–201.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1990. “The
semantics of emotions: Fear and its relatives in English.” Australian Journal of
Linguistics 10 (2): 359–375.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics,
Culture and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1999. Emotions
Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and
Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna. (2003). “Emotion
and culture: Arguing with Martha
Nussbaum.” Ethos 31 (4): 577–600.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014. Imprisoned
in English: The Hazards of English as a Default Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ye, Zhengdao. 2020. “The
semantics of emotion: From theory to empirical
analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and
Emotion, ed. by Sonya E. Pritzker, Janina Fenigsen, and James M. Wilce, 132–153. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zurba, Melanie, Boyd, Sara, Bryanne Lamoureux, Erica Mendritzki, Andrew Park, David Busolo, Lisa Binkley, and Roberta Woodgate. 2022, preprint. “Vocabularies
And rituals of climate grief in Canada: A typology.”
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Tan Gülcan, Duygu
2024.
Toplumsal İklim Krizi Algısının İklim Politikaları Üzerindeki Etkisi.
Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 7:4
► pp. 344 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.