Article published in:
Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English
Edited by Andreas H. Jucker
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35] 1995
► pp. 243
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teaching,  pp. 744 ff. Crossref logo
Archer, Dawn
2017. Context and historical (socio-)pragmatics twenty years on. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
BREBAN, TINE
2009. Structural persistence: a case based on the grammaticalization of English adjectives of difference. English Language and Linguistics 13:1  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
Chodorowska-Pilch, Marianna
1999. On the polite use of vamos in Peninsular Spanish. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 9:3  pp. 343 ff. Crossref logo
Ebert, Christian
2019. Der Rückgang pränominaler Genitive in der anstatt-Konstruktion. Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte 10:1  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Heine, Bernd
2018.  In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Kwon, Kyongjoon
2015. What isforfor?: Reconstructing the development ofwhat forconstruction in russian. Transactions of the Philological Society 113:3  pp. 305 ff. Crossref logo
Pinto de Lima, José
2019. On grammaticalized complex prepositions in Portuguese. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 54:1  pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Smet, Hendrik De & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006. Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17:3 Crossref logo
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker
2015. Twenty years of historical pragmatics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Tarriño, Eusebia, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin
2011.  In Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology, Crossref logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001.  In Regularity in Semantic Change, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.