Cover not available
Part of
Vagueness as an Implicitating Persuasive Strategy
Giorgia Mannaioli
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 350] 2025
► pp. 251–268

References

This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Adolphs, S., S. Atkins, and K. Harvey. 2007. “Caught Between Professional Requirements and Interpersonal Needs: Vague Language in Healthcare Contexts.” In Vague Language Explored, edited by J. Cutting, 62–78. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albano Leoni, F., F. Cutugno, and R. Savy. 1995. “The Vowel System of Italian Connected Speech.” In Proceeding of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Stockholm, Sweden, 13–19 August 1995), 4, 396–399. University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Alexandropoulou, S., M. Herb, H. Discher, and N. Gotzner. 2022. “Incremental Pragmatic Interpretation of Gradable Adjectives: The Role of Standards of Comparison.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory, edited by J. R. Starr, J. Kim, and B. Öney (El Colegio de Mexico and the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), 32, 481–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alxatib, S., and F. J. Pelletier. 2011. “The Psychology of Vagueness: Borderline Cases and Contradictions.” Mind & Language 26 (3): 287–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
do Amaral, B. R., and M. L. C. Lima. 2013. “Contextual Effects on Lexical Access of Polysemic and Homonym Words.” Revistaselectronicas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), no. 12061.Google Scholar
Ansani, A., M. Marini, F. D’Errico, and I. Poggi. 2020. “How Soundtracks Shape What We See: Analyzing the Influence of Music on Visual Scenes through Self-Assessment, Eye Tracking, and Pupillometry.” Frontiers in Psychology 22–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aparicio, H., M. Xiang, and C. Kennedy. 2016. “Processing gradable adjectives in context: a visual world study,” in Semantics and Linguistic Theory, edited by S. D’Antonio, M. Moroney, and C-R. Little (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University; LSA and CLC Publications), 25, 413–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aragone’s, Enriqueta, and Zvika Neeman. 2000. “Strategic Ambiguity in Electoral Competition.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12: 183–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arrabito, M., A. Fantechi, S. Gnesi, and L. Semini. 2020. “An Experience with the Application of Three NLP Tools for the Analysis of Natural Language Requirements.” In Quality of Information and Communications Technology: 13th International Conference, QUATIC 2020, Faro, Portugal, September 9–11, 2020, Proceedings, 13, 488–498. Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aslanidis, P. 2018. “Measuring Populist Discourse with Semantic Text Analysis: An Application on Grassroots Populist Mobilization.” Quality & Quantity 52 (3): 1241–1263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. 1994. Thought and Reference. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bacon, A. 2018. Vagueness and Thought. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., A. J. Aschenbrenner, and M. J. Yap. 2013. “Additive Effects of Word Frequency and Stimulus Quality: The Influence of Trial History and Data Transformations.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 39 (5): 1563–1571.Google Scholar
Bambini, V. 2017. Il Cervello Pragmatico. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. A. 2009. “The Evolution of Coding in Signaling Games.” Theory and Decision 67 (2): 223–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. 1964. “Rhétorique de l’image.” Communications 4 (1): 40–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, S. B., and A. J. Sanford. 1993. “A Case Study of Anomaly Detection: Shallow Semantic Processing and Cohesion Establishment.” Memory & Cognition 21 (4): 477–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, C. 2011. “Indeterminacy in Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 1 (1): 21–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, K. 2001. “Repair Strategies and Social Interaction in Spontaneous Spoken French: The Pragmatic Particle enfin.” Journal of French Language Studies 11 (1): 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beltrama, A., and F. Schwarz. 2021. “Imprecision, personae, and pragmatic reasoning.” In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 31), edited by N. Dreier, C. Kwon, T. Darnell, J. Starr, pp. 122–44. Washington, DC: Linguist. Soc. Am.Google Scholar
. 2022. “From Social Identity to Meaning Interpretation: When Looser Speakers Are Treated More Strictly.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 44.Google Scholar
Berger, A., and M. Kiefer. 2021. “Comparison of Different Response Time Outlier Exclusion Methods: A Simulation Study.” Frontiers in Psychology 12, 675558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, J., T. D. Breaux, J. R. Reidenberg, and T. B. Norton. 2016. “A Theory of Vagueness and Privacy Risk Perception.” In 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 26–35. IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birch, S., and K. Rayner. 1997. “Linguistic Focus Affects Eye Movements during Reading.” Memory & Cognition 25 (5): 653–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, M. 1937. “Vagueness: An Exercise in Logical Analysis.” Philosophy of Science 4 (4): 427–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blume, A., and O. Board. 2014. “Intentional Vagueness.” Erkenntnis 79: 855–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochnak, M. R., and L. Matthewson. 2020. “Techniques in Complex Semantic Fieldwork.” Annual Review of Linguistics 6: 261–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1961. Generality, Gradience, and the All-or-None. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bonalumi, F., J. B. Mahr, P. Marie, and N. Pouscoulous. 2023. “Beyond the Implicit/Explicit Dichotomy: The Pragmatics of Plausible Deniability.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonini, N., D. Osherson, R. Viale, and T. Williamson. 1999. “On the Psychology of Vague Predicates.” Mind and Language 14 (4): 377–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonnay, D., and P. Égré. 2008. “Margins for Error in Context.” In Relative Truth, edited by M. Garcia-Carpintero and M. Kölbel, 103–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Inexact Knowledge with Introspection.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2): 179–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosch, P. 1983. “Vagueness is Context-Dependence: A Solution to the Sorites Paradox.” In Approaching Vagueness, edited by T. T. Ballmer and M. Pinkal, 189–210. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bott, O., Featherston, S., Radó, J., & Stolterfoht, B. 2011. “The application of experimental methods in semantics”. In Semantics: An internal handbook of natural language meaning, edited by C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner, 305–321. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bredart, S., and K. Modolo. 1988. “Moses Strikes Again: Focalization Effect on a Semantic Illusion.” In Acta Psychologica, 67 (2): 135–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., and S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, C., and G. Lakoff. 1988. “Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks.” In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology and Artificial Intelligence, edited by S. Small, G. Cottrell, and M. Tannenhaus, 477–507. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunger, A., D. Skordos, J. C. Trueswell, and A. Papafragou. 2021. “How Children Attend to Events before Speaking: Crosslinguistic Evidence from the Motion Domain.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6 (1): Article 1.Google Scholar
Burnett, H. 2014. “A Delineation Solution to the Puzzles of Absolute Adjectives.” Linguistics and Philosophy 37: 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burns, L. 1991. Vagueness: An Investigation into Natural Languages and the Sorites Paradox. Springer Science+Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, C. 2007. Mitigation. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2012. “Mezzi Linguistici della Mitigazione in Italiano: Risultati e Prospettive di Ricerca.” In Grammatica e Pragmatica, edited by F. Orletti, A. Pompei, and E. Lombardi Vallauri, 147–189. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
2013. “Mitigation.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. 2, Pragmatics of Speech Actions, edited by M. Sbisà and K. Turner, 257–285. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2017. “La Mitigazione: Tappe di un Itinerario di Ricerca.” In Normas: Revista de Estudios Lingüísticos Hispánicos 7 (1): 4–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carli, L. L. 1990. “Gender, Language, and Influence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (5): 941. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. 2010. “Lexical Pragmatics, Ad Hoc Concepts and Metaphor: From a Relevance Theory Perspective.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1): 153–180.Google Scholar
2015. “Contextual Adjustment of Meaning.” In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, 195–210, London:Routledge.Google Scholar
2019. Ad Hoc Concepts, Polysemy and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. “Polysemy: Pragmatics and Sense Conventions.” Mind & Language 36 (1): 108–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R., and A. Hall. 2017. “Contextual Effects on Explicature: Optional Pragmatics or Optional Syntax?” International Review of Pragmatics 9 (1): 51–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R., and C. Wearing. 2011. “Metaphor, Hyperbole and Simile: A Pragmatic Approach.” Language and Cognition 3 (2): 283–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Hyperbolic Language and Its Relation to Metaphor and Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 79: 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. 1998. “Orders of Reality: CANCODE, Communication, and Culture.” ELT Journal 52 (1): 43–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. J. 2006. The Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, E., McNally, L., & Sassoon, G. W. 2018. The Semantics of Gradability, Vagueness, and Scale Structure. US: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, T. 2013. “Italian University Radio: An Explorative Study.” In Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies 1 (2): 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cedroni, L. 2014. Politolinguistica: L’Analisi del Discorso Politico. Roma: Carocci editore.Google Scholar
Channell, J. 1983. “Vague Language: Some Vague Expressions in English.” PhD diss., University of York.
1985. “Vagueness as a Conversational Strategy.” In Nottingham Linguistic Circular 14: 3–24.Google Scholar
1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. 1959. “Ambiguity in Chinese.” In Studia Serica Bernhard Karlgren Dedicata, edited by S. Egerod & E. Glahn, 1–13. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, P. 2014. Le Discours Politique: Les Masques du Pouvoir. Paris:Lambert Lucas.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1976. Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar (3rd printing). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2002. On Nature and Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. E. 2003. Language Evolution. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. 2004. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Communication. Harlow, England; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Cobreros, P., Égré, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. 2014. “Foreword: Three-valued Logics and Their Applications.” In Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24 (1–2): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cominetti, F. Forthcoming. “Nominalization as an Enhancer of Linguistic Implicitness in Political Discourse.” In Lingue e Linguaggi, 56, 69–88.
Conley, J. M., O’Barr, W. M., & Lind, E. A. 1979. “The Power of Language: Presentational Style in the Courtroom.” Duke Law Journal 1978 (6): 1375–1400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. 2008. The Language of Advertising. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Copilowish, I. M. 1939. “Border-line Cases, Vagueness, and Ambiguity.” In Philosophy of Science 6 (2): 181–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Correia, J. P., & Franke, M. 2019. “Towards an Ecology of Vagueness.” In R. Dietz (Ed.), Vagueness and Rationality in Language Use and Cognition, 87–113. Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotterill, J. 2007. “‘I Think He Was Kind of Shouting or Something’: Uses and Abuses of Vagueness in the British Courtroom.” In Vague Language Explored, edited by J. Cutting, 97–114. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. 2008. “Metaphor Comprehension and the Brain.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 177–194. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. 2005. “Blending and Coded Meaning: Literal and Figurative Meaning in Cognitive Semantics.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (10): 1510–1536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. 2002. “Conceptual Integration and Metaphor: An Event-related Potential Study.” Memory & Cognition 30 (6): 958–968. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresti, E. 2000. Corpus di Italiano Parlato. Firenze:Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. 1977. “The Pragmatics of Lexical Specificity.” Journal of Linguistics 13 (2): 153–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutting, J. 2000. Analysing the Language of Discourse Communities. Oxford: Elsevier Science. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Vague Language Explored. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Agostino, E. 2015. “Modificazioni del Linguaggio Politico Italiano Degli Ultimi Venti Anni.” Quaderns d’Italià 20: 217–236.Google Scholar
Danesi, M. 2015. “Advertising Discourse.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, edited by John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danler, P. 2005. “Morpho-syntactic and Textual Realizations as Deliberate Pragmatic Argumentative Linguistic Tools.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, edited by L. de Saussure & P. Schulz, 45–60. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, C., & Katsos, N. 2009. “Are interlocutors as sensitive to over-informativeness as they are to under-informativeness?”. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Production of Referring Expressions: Bridging Computational and Psycholinguistic Approaches edited by van Deemter, K., Gatt, A., van Gompel, R. P., & Krahmer, E., 282–287. Amsterdam: PRE-CogSci-09.Google Scholar
De Mauro, T. 1967. Ferdinand de Saussure, Corso di Linguistica Generale. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
1982. Minisemantica dei Linguaggi Non Verbali e delle Lingue. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
1999. Grande Dizionario Italiano Dell’uso. Torino:Utet.Google Scholar
2004. “Wa-yehì or (Gen. 1, 3): La Voce, L’udito e lo Spazio Linguistico.” In Il Parlato Italiano, Atti del Convegno Nazionale di Napoli, 13–15 Febbraio 2003, Napoli: M. D’Auria Editore.Google Scholar
Dennis, E. E., & Pease, T. 1993. “Radio — The Forgotten Medium.” Media Studies Journal 7 (3): xi.Google Scholar
Diana, F. “Analisi della Percezione di Artefatti in Immagini e Video.” Unpublished BA thesis.
Dietz, R. 2019. Vagueness and Rationality in Language Use and Cognition (Vol. 5). Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Do, M. L., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. 2022. “Encoding Motion Events during Language Production: Effects of Audience Design and Conceptual Salience.” Cognitive Science 46 (1): e13077. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorna, A. 1999. Le Populisme. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1991. “Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection.” Language 67 (3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. 1988. “Lexical Ambiguity and Fixation Times in Reading.” Journal of Memory and Language 27 (4): 429–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, K. S., & Gelman, S. A. 1994. “Children’s Use of Context in Interpreting ‘Big’ and ‘Little’.” Child Development 65 (4): 1178–1192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. 1991. “Categories Are for Talking: On the Cognitive and Discursive Bases of Categorization.” Theory & Psychology 1 (4): 515–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egré, P., & Icard, B. 2019. “Lying and Vagueness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Lying, edited by J. Meibauer, 354–69. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Egré, P., & Zehr, J. 2018. “Are Gaps Preferred to Gluts? A Closer Look at Borderline Contradictions.” In The Semantics of Gradability, Vagueness, and Scale Structure, edited by E. Castroviejo, L. McNally, & G. Weidman Sassoon, 25–58. Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egré, P., & Klinedinst, N. 2011. “Introduction: Vagueness and Language Use.” In Vagueness and Language Use, edited by P. Egré & N. Klinedinst, 1–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egré, P., & Bonnay, D. 2010. “Vagueness, Uncertainty and Degrees of Clarity.” Synthese 174 (1): 47–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elbourne, P. 2019. “Vagueness, Contextualism, and Ellipsis.” Semantics and Pragmatics 12: 22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eliasoph, N. 1987. “Politeness, Power, and Women’s Language: Rethinking Study in Language and Gender.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32: 79–103.Google Scholar
Emodi, L. N. 2011. “A Semantic Analysis of the Language of Advertising.” African Research Review 5 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, P. E., Bailey, K. G., & Ferreira, F. 2006. “Do Speakers and Listeners Observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity?” Journal of Memory and Language 54 (4): 554–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. 1981. “From Words to Meaning: A Semantic Illusion.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20 (5): 540–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falkum, I. L. 2015. “The How and Why of Polysemy: A Pragmatic Account.” Lingua 157: 83–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, B., & Waxman, S. 2017. “Linking Language and Categorization in Infancy.” Journal of Child Language 44 (3): 527–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillenbaum, S. 1974. “Pragmatic Normalization: Further Results for Some Conjunctive and Disjunctive Sentences.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4): 574–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, edited by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Fine, K. 1975. “Vagueness, Truth and Logic.” Synthese 30 (3–4): 265–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franke, M., Jäger, G., & van Rooij, R. 2011. “Vagueness, Signaling and Bounded Rationality.” In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, JSAI-isAI 2010, edited by T. Onada, D. Bekki, E. McCready, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6797. Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. 1990. “Taking on Semantic Commitments: Processing Multiple Meanings vs. Multiple Senses.” Journal of Memory and Language 29 (2): 181–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frege, G. 1893. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, vol. 1. Jena: Pohle.Google Scholar
Gaifman, H. 2010. “Vagueness, Tolerance and Contextual Logic.” Synthese 174 (1): 5–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garassino, D., Masia, V., & Brocca, N. 2019. “Tweet as You Speak: Relation Between Implicit Categories and Their Pragmatic Functions in a Diamesic Comparison.” Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 187–207.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, M. 2010. “Supervaluationism and the Report of Vague Contents.” In Cuts and Clouds: Essays in the Nature and Logic of Vagueness, edited by S. Moruzzi & R. Dietz, 345–359. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garzone, G., & Rudvin, M. 2003. “Domain-specific English and Language Mediation in Professional and Institutional Settings.” Milan:Arcipelago.Google Scholar
Gatti, C. 2019. I Demoni di Salvini: I Postnazisti e la Lega. La più Clamorosa Infiltrazione Politica della Storia Italiana. Milan:Chiarelettere.Google Scholar
Gert, J. 2008. “Vague Terms, Indexicals, and Vague Indexicals.” Philosophical Studies 140 (3): 437–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geyer, D. L. 1914. The Pragmatic Theory of Truth as Developed by Peirce, James, and Dewey. University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Ghirlanda, S., & Enquist, M. 2003. “A Century of Generalization.” Animal Behaviour 66 (1): 15–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannuli, S. 2017. Classe Dirigente: Mappa del Potere in Italia Fra la Seconda e la Terza Repubblica (Vol. 41). Milan:Ponte alle Grazie.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. 2008. Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piantadosi, S. P., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., Levy, R. 2019. “How Efficiency Shapes Human Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23 (5): 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. 2008. Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. 1999. “Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Adaptive Toolbox.” In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, edited by P. M. Todd, 3–34. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillon, B. S. 1990. “Ambiguity, Generality, and Indeterminacy: Tests and Definitions.” Synthese 85 (3): 391–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. 2007. “Is Metaphor Special?” Brain and Language 100 (2): 111–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. “Is Metaphor Unique.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by Gibbs, R. W. 143–160. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L., and A. Papafragou. 2005. Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goatly, A. 1997. The Language of Metaphors. London:Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C., C. C. Camblin, and T. Y. Swaab. 2004. “On-line Measures of Coreferential Processing.” In The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension, edited by M. Carreiras and C. Clifton, 139–150. New York:Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gotzner, N., and D. Mazzarella. 2021. “Face Management and Negative Strengthening: The Role of Power Relations, Social Distance, and Gender.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 602977. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotzner, N., S. Solt, and A. Benz. 2018. “Adjectival Scales and Three Types of Implicature.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 28:409–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graff, D. 2000. “Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness.” Philosophical Topics 28 (1): 45–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., J. Mio, and K. K. Millis. 1989. “Metaphors in Persuasive Communication.” In Comprehension of Literary Discourse: Results and Problems of Interdisciplinary Approaches, 131–154.Google Scholar
Green, M. J., and K. van Deemter. 2011. “Vagueness as Cost Reduction: An Empirical Test.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Production of Referring Expressions at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston.Google Scholar
. 2019. “The Elusive Benefits of Vagueness: Evidence from Experiments.” In Vagueness and Rationality in Language Use and Cognition, edited by R. Dietz, 63–86. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenough, P. 2003. “Vagueness: A Minimal Theory.” Mind 112 (446): 235–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, edited by P. C. and J. L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guélorget, P., B. Icard, G. Gadek, S. Gahbiche, S. Gatepaille, G. Atemezing, and P. Égré. 2021. “Combining Vagueness Detection with Deep Learning to Identify Fake News.” In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), Sun City, South Africa. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, X. 2011. Lexical Vagueness Handling Using Fuzzy Logic in Human-Robot Interaction. University of Bedfordshire.Google Scholar
Gupta, C., A. Jain, and N. Joshi. 2018. “Fuzzy Logic in Natural Language Processing — A Closer View.” Procedia Computer Science 132: 1375–1384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hald, L. A., E. G. Steenbeek-Planting, and P. Hagoort. 2007. “The Interaction of Discourse Context and World Knowledge in Online Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from the N400.” Brain Research 1146: 210–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haas, A. 1979. “Male and Female Spoken Language Differences: Stereotypes and Evidence.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (3): 616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., L. Hald, M. Bastiaansen, and K. M. Petersson. 2004. “Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension.” Science 304 (5669): 438–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., and J. Van Berkum. 2007. “Beyond the Sentence Given.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362 (1481): 801–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey:Pearson Educational International.Google Scholar
Hale, S. 1997. “The Treatment of Register Variation in Court Interpreting.” The Translator 3 (1): 39–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. “How Faithfully Do Court Interpreters Render the Style of Non-English Speaking Witnesses’ Testimonies? A Data-Based Study of Spanish-English Bilingual Proceedings.” Discourse Studies 4 (1): 25–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, A., and D. Mazzarella. 2023. “Pragmatic Inference, Levels of Meaning and Speaker Accountability.” Journal of Pragmatics 205: 92–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendy, D. 2013. Radio in the Global Age. US: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. 2008. “Gender, Leadership and Discourse in New Zealand Workplaces.” Studies in Pragmatics 10: 83–101.Google Scholar
1997. “Women, Language and Identity.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 1 (2): 195–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., and R. G. Morrison. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornby, P. A. 1974. “Surface Structure and Presupposition.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13 (5): 530–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humberstone, I. L. A. 1972. “A Note on ‘Instead of’.” York Papers in Linguistics 2: 137–142.Google Scholar
Hyde, D. 1997. “From Heaps and Gaps to Heaps of Gluts.” Mind 106 (424): 641–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ignazi, P. 2020. I Partiti in Italia dal 1945 al 2018. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ivaldi, G., M. E. Lanzone, and D. Woods. 2017. “Varieties of Populism across a Left-Right Spectrum: The Case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos and Five Star Movement.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 354–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ježek, E. 2016. The Lexicon: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ji, Y., and A. Papafragou. 2022. “Boundedness in Event Cognition: Viewers Spontaneously Represent the Temporal Texture of Events.” Journal of Memory and Language 127: 104353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. 2013 [ex 1987]. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., S. W. Smith, and T. Lüdge. 2003. “Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (12): 1737–1769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1981. “The Simulation Heuristic.” Stanford University CA Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. 1981. “The Paradox of the Heap.” In Aspects of Philosophical Logic, edited by U. Mönnich, 225–277. Dordecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H., and U. Mönnich. 1984. “The Paradox of the Heap.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (3).Google Scholar
Kamp, H., and B. Partee. 1995. “Prototype Theory and Compositionality.” Cognition 57 (2): 129–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karimi, H., and F. Ferreira. 2016. “Good-Enough Linguistic Representations and Online Cognitive Equilibrium in Language Processing.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (5): 1013–1040. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufer, D. S. 1983. “Irony, Interpretive Form, and the Theory of Meaning.” Poetics Today 4 (3): 451–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keefe, R. 2000. Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. O. 1976. “The Universality of Conversational Postulates.” Language in Society 5 (1): 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. 2007. “Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (1): 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khatchadourian, H. 1962. “Vagueness.” The Philosophical Quarterly 12 (47): 138–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., M. Tamariz, H. Cornish, and K. Smith. 2015. “Compression and Communication in the Cultural Evolution of Linguistic Structure.” Cognition 141: 87–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klepousniotou, E., and S. R. Baum. 2007. “Disambiguating the Ambiguity Advantage Effect in Word Recognition: An Advantage for Polysemous but Not Homonymous Words.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 20 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koester, A. 2007. “‘About Twelve Thousand or So’: Vagueness in North American and UK Offices.” In Vague Language Explored, edited by J. Cutting, 40–61. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J., and R. Dawkins. 1984. “Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation.” In Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, edited by J. Krebs and N. Davies, 380–402. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krifka, M. 2002. “Be Brief and Vague! And How Bidirectional Optimality Theory Allows for Verbosity and Precision.” In Sounds and systems. Studies in structure and change. A festschrift for Theo vennemann, edited by D. Restle and D. Zaefferer, 439–458. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. “Varieties of Semantic Evidence.” In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 1, edited by C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner, 242–267. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, P. R. 2018. Analyzing Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Textbooks in Language Sciences. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
La Rocca, D., V. Masia, E. Maiorana, E. L. Vallauri, and P. Campisi. 2016. “Brain Response to Information Structure Misalignments in Linguistic Contexts.” Neurocomputing 199: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1970. “A Note on Vagueness and Ambiguity.” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 357–359.Google Scholar
1972. “Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.” Chicago Linguistic Society Papers 8: 183–228.Google Scholar
1990. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2008. “The Neural Theory of Metaphor.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by W. W. Gibbs, 17–38. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 2008 [2003]. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1977. “Women’s Styles of Speaking: Their Psychological Significance.” Conference on Women’s Language, Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York.
1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Landman, F. 1991. Structures for Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, P. 1999. “Pragmatic Halos.” Language 75 (3): 522–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lassiter, D., and N. D. Goodman. 2015. “How Many Kinds of Reasoning? Inference, Probability, and Natural Language Semantics.” Cognition 136: 123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leaper, C., and R. D. Robnett. 2011. “Women Are More Likely than Men to Use Tentative Language, Aren’t They? A Meta-Analysis Testing for Gender Differences and Moderators.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 35 (1): 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leffel, T., A. Cremers, N. Gotzner, and J. Romoli. 2019. “Vagueness in Implicature: The Case of Modified Adjectives.” Journal of Semantics 36 (2): 317–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leffel, T., M. Xiang, and C. Kennedy. 2016. “Imprecision Is Pragmatic: Evidence from Referential Processing.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 836–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. 1971. “Of Language Knowledge, Apes, and Brains.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, N. 2022. Communicative Efficiency. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1969. Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1975. “Languages and Language.” In Language, Mind and Knowledge, edited by K. Gunderson, 3–35. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 7.Google Scholar
1970. “General Semantics.” Synthese 22: 18–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. C., and K. Ahrens. 2000. “Calculating the Number of Senses: Implications for Ambiguity Advantage Effect during Lexical Access.” Proceedings of the ISCLL VII 2000: 141–154.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. 1990. “Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory.” In Speech Production and Speech Modeling, edited by W. Hardcastle and A. Marchal, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipman, B. L. 2009. “Why Is Language Vague.” Unpublished manuscript. Accessed June 29, 2023. [URL]
Liu, F., N. L. Fella, and K. Liao. 2016. “Modeling Language Vagueness in Privacy Policies Using Deep Neural Networks.” 2016 AAAI Fall Symposium Series.Google Scholar
Lo, S., and S. Andrews. 2015. “To Transform or Not to Transform: Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models to Analyse Reaction Time Data.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E. F. 1975. “Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report.” Cognitive Psychology 7 (4): 560–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, E. 2009. La Struttura Informativa: Forma e Funzione negli Enunciati Linguistici. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
2016. “The ‘Exaptation’ of Linguistic Implicit Strategies.” SpringerPlus 5 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. La Lingua Disonesta. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, E., L. Baranzini, D. Cimmino, F. Cominetti, C. Coppola, and G. Mannaioli. 2020. “Implicit Argumentation and Persuasion: A Measuring Model.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (1): 95–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, E., and V. Masia. 2014. “Implicitness Impact: Measuring Texts.” Journal of Pragmatics 61: 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupyan, G., and D. Mirman. 2013. “Linking Language and Categorization: Evidence from Aphasia.” Cortex 49 (5): 1187–1194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, L. J., J. M. Rodd, R. A. Gilbert, O. Hauk, E. Sohoglu, and M. H. Davis. 2020. “The Neural Time Course of Semantic Ambiguity Resolution in Speech Comprehension.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 32 (3): 403–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machetti, S. 2006. Uscire dal Vago: Analisi Linguistica della Vaghezza nel Linguaggio. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
2007. “Vaghezza Semiotica e Linguistica e Misurazione della Competenza in Italiano L2.” In Investigating Gender, Translation and Culture in Italian Studies, 311.Google Scholar
2011. “La Vaghezza Linguistica come Problema della Pragmatica: Questioni Teoriche e Dati a Confronto.” Esercizi Filosofici 6 (1): 195–213.Google Scholar
Magni, E. 2016. “Setti Tipi di Ambiguità nel Mutamento Linguistico.” In Problemi e Prospettive della Linguistica Storica: Atti del XL Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, Biblioteca della Società Italiana di Glottologia 40. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
Maillat, D., and S. Oswald. 2011. “Constraining Context.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, 65–80. Amsterdam — Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maingueneau, D. 2016. Analyser les Textes de Communication. Nouvelle édition revue et mise à jour. Paris: Armand Colin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mannaioli, G., A. Ansani, C. Coppola, and E. Lombardi Vallauri. 2024. “Vagueness as an Implicit-Encoding Persuasive Strategy: An Experimental Approach.” Cognitive Processing 25:205–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mannaioli, G. 2023. “La Vaghezza Linguistica Come Strategia Implicita Persuasiva e Fenomeno di Interfaccia tra Semantica, Sintassi e Pragmatica. Esempi dal Discorso Pubblico Contemporaneo in Diverse Lingue.” Italiano Linguadue 15 (2): 206–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marini, M., G. Paglieri, A. Ansani, F. Caruana, and M. Viola. 2022. “Facial Impression of Trustworthiness Biases Statement Credibility Unless Suppressed by Facemask.” Current Psychology.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. 1955. Économie des Changements Phonétiques. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Masia, V., P. Canal, I. Ricci, E. L. Vallauri, and V. Bambini. 2017. “Presupposition of New Information as a Pragmatic Garden Path: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 42: 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masnan, M. J., N. I. Mahat, A. Y. M. Shakaff, A. H. Abdullah, N. Z. I. Zakaria, N. Yusuf, N. Subari, A. Zakaria, and A. H. A. Aziz. 2015. “Understanding Mahalanobis Distance Criterion for Feature Selection.” In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1660 (1): 050075. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzarella, D., and N. Gotzner. 2021. “The Polarity Asymmetry of Negative Strengthening: Dissociating Adjectival Polarity from Face-Threatening Potential.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6 (1).Google Scholar
McGee, P. 2018. “Vague Language as a Means of Avoiding Controversy.” Training, Language and Culture 2 (2): 40–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mereu, L. 2020. Semantica della Frase. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Merrell, F. 1997. Peirce, Signs, and Meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mihatsch, W. 2007. “The Construction of Vagueness: ‘Sort of’ Expressions in Romance Languages.” In Aspects of Meaning Constructing Meaning: From Concepts to Utterances, edited by G. Radden, K. Koepcke, T. Berg, and P. Siemund, 225–245. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulac, A., J. M. Wiemann, S. J. Widenmann, and T. W. Gibson. 1988. “Male/Female Language Differences and Effects in Same-Sex and Mixed-Sex Dyads: The Gender-Linked Language Effect.” Communications Monographs 55 (4): 315–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novák, V., R. Seising, E. Trillas, and J. Kacprzyk. 2015. “Fuzzy Natural Logic: Towards Mathematical Logic of Human Reasoning.” In Fuzzy Logic: Towards the Future, 137–165. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novák, V. 2017. “Fuzzy Logic in Natural Language Processing.” In IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 1–6. IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. 2018. Experimental Pragmatics: The Making of a Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. A., and N. L. Komarova. 2001. “Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (7): 288–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, C. 2014. “The Evolution of Vagueness.” Erkenntnis 79 (4): 707–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. “Evolving to Generalize: Trading Precision for Speed.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2): 389–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., and W. Cheng. 2015. “Vague Language.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, edited by K. Aijmer and C. Ruehlemann, 686–869. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oms, S., and E. Zardini. 2019. The Sorites Paradox. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Origgi, G., and D. Sperber. 2000. “Evolution, Communication and the Function of Language.” In Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition, edited by P. Carruthers and A. Chamberlain, 140–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, M. E., and S. Grosjean. 2012. “Confirmation Bias.” In Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory, 91–108. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. 1999. Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M., and G. Yule. 1997a. “Locally Contingent Categorization in Discourse.” Discourse Processes 23 (1): 83–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997b. “On Being Inexplicit and Stuff in Contemporary American English.” Journal of English Linguistics 25 (3): 250–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., J. C. Trueswell, and L. R. Gleitman. 2022. The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Passarelli, G., and D. Tuorto. 2018. La Lega di Salvini. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Peccei, J. 1994. Child Language. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1902. “Vague.” In Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, edited by J. M. Baldwin. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1955 [1878]. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear?” Popular Science Monthly 12: 286–302.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S., Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur W. Burks. 1974. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petrilli, R. 2015. La Lingua Politica: Lessico e Strutture Argomentative. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Piantadosi, S. T., H. Tily, and E. Gibson. 2012. “The Communicative Function of Ambiguity in Language.” Cognition 122 (3): 280–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., B. McElree, S. Frisson, L. Chen, and M. J. Traxler. 2006. “Underspecification and Aspectual Coercion.” Discourse Processes 42 (2): 131–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piñango, M. M., E. Zurif, and R. Jackendoff. 1999. “Real-Time Processing Implications of Enriched Composition at the Syntax — Semantics Interface.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 395–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinkal, M. 1995. Logic and Lexicon: The Semantics of the Indefinite. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., M. A. Nowak, and J. J. Lee. 2008. “The Logic of Indirect Speech.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (3): 833–838. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poggi, I., and L. Vincze. 2012. “Communicating Vagueness by Hands and Face.” In Proceedings of the ICMI Workshop on Multimodal Corpora for Machine Learning. Alicante.Google Scholar
Prandi, M. 2017. Conceptual Conflicts in Metaphors and Figurative Language. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prelipceanu, C.-M. 2013. “Advertising and Language Manipulation.” Diversité et Identité Culturelle en Europe 10 (2): 247–254.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F., J. Frader, and C. Bosk. 1982. “On Hedging in Physician-Physician Discourse.” Linguistics and the Professions 8 (1): 83–97.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B. 2006. “The syntax-semantics interface: on-line composition of sentence meaning” in Handbook of Psycholinguistics, edited by Traxler, M., & Gernsbacher, M. A., 537–577. New York: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raffman, D. 1994. “Vagueness without Paradox.” The Philosophical Review 103 (1): 41–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. “Vagueness and Context-Relativity.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 81 (2/3): 175–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “How to Understand Contextualism about Vagueness: Reply to Stanley.” Analysis 65 (3): 244–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapp, D. N., and N. A. Salovich. 2018. “Can’t We Just Disregard Fake News? The Consequences of Exposure to Inaccurate Information.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2): 232–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rathert, Monika. 2005. “Ambiguity.” In Encyclopedia of Linguistics, edited by Philipp Strazny. New York/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reboul, A. 2011. “A Relevance-Theoretic Account of the Evolution of Implicit Communication.” Studies in Pragmatics 13 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Reichle, E. D., K. Rayner, and A. Pollatsek. 2003. “The EZ Reader Model of Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Comparisons to Other Models.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4): 445–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rein, A. 1985. “Frege and Natural Language.” Philosophy 60 (234): 513–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M. 2002. “Dem Volk aufs Maul Schauen, nach dem Mund Reden und Angst und Bange Machen: Von Populistischen Anrufungen, Anbiederungen und Agitationsweisen in der Sprache Österreichischer PolitikerInnen.” In Rechtspopulismus in Europa: Österreichische Krankheit oder Europäische Normalität?, edited by W. Eismann, 149–198. Vienna: Cernin.Google Scholar
Renzi, V. 2015. La Politica della Ruspa: La Lega di Salvini e le Nuove Destre Europee. Roma: Alegre.Google Scholar
Ronzitti, G., ed. 2011. Vagueness: A Guide. Springer Netherlands. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E., and B. Lloyd. 1978. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rodd, J. M., M. H. Davis, and I. S. Johnsrude. 2005. “The Neural Mechanisms of Speech Comprehension: FMRI Studies of Semantic Ambiguity.” Cerebral Cortex 15 (8): 1261–1269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubio Fernandez, P. 2007. “Suppression in Metaphor Interpretation: Differences between Meaning Selection and Meaning Construction.” Journal of Semantics 24 (4): 345–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1923. “Vagueness.” The Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 1 (2): 84–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, J. M. 1977. “Truth and Approximations.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 3: 430–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saeed, J. I. 2009. Semantics. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sanford, A. J., and A. C. Graesser. 2006. “Shallow Processing and Underspecification.” Discourse Processes 42 (2): 99–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J., and P. Sturt. 2002. “Depth of Processing in Language Comprehension: Not Noticing the Evidence.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (9): 382–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, F. 1967. Corso di Linguistica Generale, Introduzione, Traduzione e Commento di T. De Mauro. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
de Saussure, L. 2005. “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, edited by L. de Saussure and P. Schulz, 113–145. Vol. 17. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. 1990. The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sawyer, A. G., and D. J. Howard. 1991. “Effects of Omitting Conclusions in Advertisements to Involved and Uninvolved Audiences.” Journal of Marketing Research 28 (4): 467–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrank, J. 1976. “The Language of Advertising Claims.” In Teaching About Doublespeak, edited by D. Dieterich. Illinois: NCTE.Google Scholar
Schwarz, F. 2015. “Presuppositions vs. Asserted Content in Online Processing.” In Experimental Perspectives on Presuppositions, edited by F. Schwarz, 89–108. Vol. 45. Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Presuppositions, Projection, and Accommodation-Theoretical Issues and Experimental Approaches.” Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. 2014. Speaking Our Minds: Why Human Communication Is Different, and How Language Evolved to Make It Special. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scotto Di Carlo, G. 2013. Vagueness as a Political Strategy: Weasel Words in Security Council Resolutions Relating to the Second Gulf War. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, edited by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serchuk, P., I. Hargreaves, and R. Zach. 2011. “Vagueness, Logic and Use: Four Experimental Studies on Vagueness.” Mind & Language 26 (5): 540–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2003. “Vagueness and Conversation.” In Liars and Heaps, edited by J. C. Beall. 39–72. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006. Vagueness in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shopen, T. 1973. “Ellipsis as Grammatical Indeterminacy.” Foundations of Language 10 (1): 65–77.Google Scholar
Simone, R. 2020. Il Software del Linguaggio. Milano: R. Cortina.Google Scholar
2005. Fondamenti di Linguistica. 16th ed. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
2004. “L’infinito Nominale nel Discorso.” In Generi, Architetture e Forme Testuali, edited by P. D’Achille, 73–96. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
Simone, R., and E. Lombardi Vallauri. 2010. “Natural Constraints in Language: Nature and Consequences.” Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 205–224.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Natural Constraints in Language: The Ergonomics of the Software.” Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 119–141.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. B. 1994. “Context and the Processing of Ambiguous Words.” In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, edited by M. A. Gernsbacher, 359–74. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 1999. Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solt, S., and N. Gotzner. 2012. “Experimenting with Degree.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 166–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solt, S. 2014. “An Alternative Theory of Imprecision.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 514–533.Google Scholar
2015. “Vagueness and Imprecision: Empirical Foundations.” Annual Review of Linguistics 1 (1): 107–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Multidimensionality, Subjectivity and Scales: Experimental Evidence.” In The Semantics of Gradability, Vagueness, and Scale Structure, edited by E. Castroviejo, L. McNally, and G. Weidman Sassoon, 59–91. Vol. 4. Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, R. A. 2010. “Borderline Hermaphrodites: Higher-Order Vagueness by Example.” Mind 119 (474): 393–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988. Blindspots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spector, B. 2016. “Multivalent Semantics for Vagueness and Presupposition.” Topoi 35 (1): 45–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Vol. 142. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2008. “A Deflationary Account of Metaphors.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by R. W. Gibbs, 84–105. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., F. Clément, C. Heintz, O. Mascaro, H. Mercier, G. Origgi, and D. Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language 25 (4): 359–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. 2003. “Context, Interest Relativity and the Sorites.” Analysis 63 (4): 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengel-Eskin, E., J. Guallar-Blasco, and B. Van Durme. 2021. “Human-Model Divergence in the Handling of Vagueness.” Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 4 (1): 390–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternau, M., M. Ariel, R. Giora, and O. Fein. 2017. “Deniability and Explicatures.” Doing Pragmatics Interculturally 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1971. “Identifying Reference and Truth-Values.” Semantics 86–114.Google Scholar
Strazny, P. 2005. Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
Sturt, P., A. J. Sanford, A. Stewart, and E. Dawydiak. 2004. “Linguistic Focus and Good-Enough Representations: An Application of the Change-Detection Paradigm.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (5): 882–888. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. 1994. Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tendahl, M., and R. W. Gibbs. 2008. “Complementary Perspectives on Metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and Relevance Theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (11): 1823–1864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terracciano, B. 2019. “Il Linguaggio della Paura: La Strategia Social Mediale di Matteo Salvini/The Language of Fear: Matteo Salvini’s Social Media Strategy.” Rivista Italiana Di Filosofia Del Linguaggio 13 (2), 165–181.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. L., and R. H. Heck. 2001. “Analysis of Large-Scale Secondary Data in Higher Education Research: Potential Perils Associated with Complex Sampling Designs.” Research in Higher Education 42 (5): 517–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todorova, M., K. Straub, W. Badecker, and R. Frank. 2000. “Aspectual Coercion and the Online Computation of Sentential Aspect.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 22.Google Scholar
Torrens-Urrutia, A., M. D. J. López, and A. Brosa-Rodríguez. 2021. “A Fuzzy Approach to Language Universals for NLP.” In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 1–6. IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrens Urrutia, A., M. D. Jiménez-López, and V. Novák. 2022. “Fuzzy Natural Logic for Sentiment Analysis: A Proposal.” In Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Volume 2: Special Sessions 18th International Conference, 64–73. Springer International Publishing.
Trappes-Lomax, H. 2007. “Vague Language as a Means of Self-Protective Avoidance: Tension Management in Conference Talks.” In Vague Language Explored, edited by J. Cutting, 117–137. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. 1995. “The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization.” Ichl XII, Manchester, 123.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., and G. Trousdale. 2010. “Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How Do They Intersect?” In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization, edited by E. C. Traugott and G. Trousdale, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, D. 1993. “Ambiguity, Polysemy, and Vagueness.” Cognitive Linguistics 4: 273–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in Judgments Reveal Some Heuristics of Thinking under Uncertainty.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ünal, E., Y. Ji, and A. Papafragou. 2021. “From Event Representation to Linguistic Meaning.” Topics in Cognitive Science 13 (1): 224–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ünal, E., and A. Papafragou. 2019. “How Children Identify Events from Visual Experience.” Language Learning and Development 15 (2): 138–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Deemter, K. 1996. “The Sorites Fallacy and the Context-Dependence of Vague Predicates.” In Quantifiers, Deduction, and Context, edited by M. Kanazawa et al., 59–86. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2009. “Utility and Language Generation: The Case of Vagueness.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 38: 607–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Not Exactly: In Praise of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. 1997. “What Is Political Discourse Analysis?” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11 (1): 11–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse & Society 17 (3): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Discourse, Cognition, Society.” In The Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis, edited by J. Angermuller, D. Maingueneau, & R. Wodak, 388–399. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., and R. J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varzi, A. C. 2003. “Higher-Order Vagueness and the Vagueness of ‘Vague’.” Mind 112 (446): 295–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasiloaia, M. 2009. “Linguistic Features of the Language of Advertising.” Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition 1: 294–298.Google Scholar
Vincze, L. 2014. “How to Put It Vaguely.” ISSA Proceedings.Google Scholar
Voghera, M. 2012. “Chitarre, Violini, Banjo e Cose del Genere.” In Per Tullio De Mauro: Studi Offerti dalle Allieve in Occasione del Suo 80° Compleanno, edited by A. Thornton and M. Voghera, 341–364. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
2013. “A Case Study on the Relationship between Grammatical Change and Synchronic Variation: The Emergence of tipo[-N] in Italian.” In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface, edited by A. Giacalone Ramat, C. Mauri, and P. Molinelli, 283–312. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. “Quando Vaghezza e Focus Entrano in Contatto: Il Caso di un Attimo, anzi un Attimino.” In Di Tutti i Colori: Studi Linguistici per Maria Grossmann, edited by R. D’Alessandro, G. Iannàccaro, D. Passino, and A. M. Thornton, 385–397. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Wachtel, T. 1980. “Pragmatic Approximations.” Journal of Pragmatics 4: 201–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U. 1966. “Explorations in Semantic Theory.” In Current Trends in Linguistics Vol. III, edited by T. Sebeok, 359–374. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. 1909. First and Last Things: A Confession of Faith and Rule of Life. Vol. 4129. Leipzig: B. Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Wenzhong, Z., and J. Li. 2013. “A Pragmatic Study on the Functions of Vague Language in Commercial Advertising.” English Language Teaching 6 (6): 103–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westermann, G., & Mareschal, D. 2014. “From perceptual to language-mediated categorization” in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weydt, H. 1973. “On G. Lakoff, ‘Instrumental Adverbs and the Concept of Deep Structure.’” Foundations of Language 10 (4): 569–578.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2002. Vagueness. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Vagueness in Reality. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T., and P. Simons. 1992. “Vagueness and Ignorance.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 66: 145–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., and D. Sperber. 2004. “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by L. R. Horn and G. Ward, 607–632. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., and R. Carston. 2007. “A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts.” In Pragmatics, edited by N. Burton-Roberts, 230–259. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Pragmatics and the Challenge of ‘Non-Propositional’ Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 31–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1961. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 1975. “On the Coherence of Vague Predicates.” Synthese 30 (3): 325–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. “Is Higher-Order Vagueness Coherent?” Analysis 52 (3): 129–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, X. Y., and Y. A. Wu. 2008. “Same Vague Expression, Different Conceptualizations.” Online Submission 5 (9): 50–54.Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control 8 (3): 338–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zehr, J. 2014. “Vagueness, Presupposition and Truth-Value Judgments.” Doctoral dissertation, École Normale Supérieure de Paris.
Zelenkauskaite, A., and B. Simões. 2015. “User Interaction Profiling on Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ across Radio Stations.” In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1657–1666. IEEE. DOI logo
Zempleni, M.-Z., R. Renken, J. C. J. Hoeks, J. M. Hoogduin, and L. A. Stowe. 2007. “Semantic Ambiguity Processing in Sentence Context: Evidence from Event-Related fMRI.” NeuroImage 34 (3): 1270–1279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. 1998. “Fuzziness — Vagueness — Generality — Ambiguity.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (1): 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Y., Z. Xu, and X. Wang. 2021. “The Fusion of Deep Learning and Fuzzy Systems: A State-of-the-Art Survey.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 30: 8, 2783–2799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D. W., and R. H. Williams. 2000. “Restriction of Range and Correlation in Outlier-Prone Distributions.” Applied Psychological Measurement 24 (3): 267–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A., and J. Sadock. 1975. “Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4, edited by J. P. Kimball, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar