Adamson, John
2012.
Mentoring academic journal reviewers: brokering reviewing knowledge.
Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49:2
► pp. 223 ff.
Afful, Joseph Benjamin Archibald & Rita Akele Twumasi
2022.
The language of evaluation in academic writing research in Ghana, 2000-2020: A synthesis.
International Journal of Research Studies in Education 11:4
Ansary, Hasan & Esmat Babaii
2009.
A Cross-cultural Analysis of English Newspaper Editorials.
RELC Journal 40:2
► pp. 211 ff.
Beer, Bettina, Alexander Kochinka, Carlos Kölbl, Torsten M. Kühlmann, Hede Helfrich, Doris Weidemann, Bernd Spillner, Susanne Günthner, Gabriel Layes, Arnd-Michael Nohl, Heiko Hausendorf, Ralph M. Köhnen, Ulrike Froschauer, Manfred Lueger & Ina Ehnert
2007.
Methoden. In
Handbuch interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kompetenz,
► pp. 313 ff.
Bex, Tony
1999.
The linguistic study of non‐literary genres: The view from the reader.
European Journal of English Studies 3:1
► pp. 87 ff.
Bharti, Prabhat Kumar, Meith Navlakha, Mayank Agarwal & Asif Ekbal
2023.
PolitePEER: does peer review hurt? A dataset to gauge politeness intensity in the peer reviews.
Language Resources and Evaluation
Bhatia, Vijay K.
2019.
Genres and Styles in World Englishes. In
The Handbook of World Englishes,
► pp. 368 ff.
Bruland, Holly H.
2009.
Rhetorical Cues and Cultural Clues: An Analysis of the Recommendation Letter in English Studies.
Rhetoric Review 28:4
► pp. 406 ff.
Burgess, Sally
2022.
On Mediating and Being Mediated: Experiences of Harmony and Contention. In
The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication,
► pp. 207 ff.
Castaño Arques, Ana & Carmen López Ferrero
2023.
Peer-feedback of an occluded genre in the Spanish language classroom: A case study.
Assessing Writing 57
► pp. 100756 ff.
Cañada, Maria Dolors & Carmen López-Ferrero
Cañada Pujols, Maria Dolors & Carme Bach
2022.
Marcadores metadiscursivos interaccionales en resúmenes de TFG: ¿indicadores de dominio del género?.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90
► pp. 5 ff.
Chan, Hang
2021.
A corpus-based approach to comparing English textbook pedagogies: The case of Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of China.
Pedagogies: An International Journal 16:3
► pp. 256 ff.
Charlotte, Veronica & Derek Irwin
2019.
The Scientific Research Article Publication Process as a Macro-Genre: Outlining the Parameters of Successful and Unsuccessful Communication Between the Writers and the Gatekeeping Readers. In
Specialized Discourses and Their Readerships [
The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],
► pp. 1 ff.
Chen, Sibo
2017.
Disciplinary variations in academic promotional writing: the case of statements of purpose.
Functional Linguistics 4:1
Chiu, Yuan-Li Tiffany
2019.
‘It’s a match, but is it a good fit?’: admissions tutors’ evaluation of personal statements for PhD study.
Oxford Review of Education 45:1
► pp. 136 ff.
Colombini, Crystal Broch
2018.
Composing Crisis: Hardship Letters and the Political Economies of Genre.
College English 80:3
► pp. 218 ff.
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020.
The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,
DeJeu, Emily Barrow
2024.
Topoi of Nonprofit Proposal Writing.
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 87:1
► pp. 122 ff.
Ding, Huiling
2017.
Cross-Culturally Narrating Risks, Imagination, and Realities of HIV/AIDS. In
Emerging Genres in New Media Environments,
► pp. 153 ff.
Huiling Ding
2008.
The Use of Cognitive and Social Apprenticeship to Teach a Disciplinary Genre.
Written Communication 25:1
► pp. 3 ff.
Domenec, Fanny & Philippe Millot
2021.
What Is Professional in a Professional Magazine? Using Corpus Analysis to Identify Specializedness in Professional Discourse and Culture. In
Good Data in Business and Professional Discourse Research and Teaching,
► pp. 55 ff.
Doody, Sara
2024.
Navigating Genres in Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Doctoral Programs.
Technical Communication Quarterly 33:2
► pp. 227 ff.
Doody, Sara & Natasha Artemeva
2022.
“Everything Is in the Lab Book”: Multimodal Writing, Activity, and Genre Analysis of Symbolic Mediation in Medical Physics.
Written Communication 39:1
► pp. 3 ff.
Dynel, Marta
2020.
Laughter through tears: Unprofessional review comments as humor on the ShitMyReviewersSay Twitter account.
Intercultural Pragmatics 17:5
► pp. 513 ff.
Englander, Karen & Guadalupe López-Bonilla
2011.
Acknowledging or denying membership: Reviewers’ responses to non-anglophone scientists’ manuscripts.
Discourse Studies 13:4
► pp. 395 ff.
Falkenberg, Laura J. & Patricia A. Soranno
2018.
Reviewing Reviews: An Evaluation of Peer Reviews of Journal Article Submissions.
Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 27:1
► pp. 1 ff.
FARLEY, PETER C.
2016.
Genre Analysis of Decision Letters from Editors of Scientific Journals: Building on Flowerdew and Dudley-Evans (2002).
Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw043 ff.
Farnia, Maryam, George Ypsilandis & Bahareh Ghasempour
2019.
Intracultural Iranian Persuasion The Case of Scholarship Application Letters.
Journal of Intercultural Communication 19:3
► pp. 1 ff.
Fazel, Ismaeil
2023.
Novice Multilingual Writers Learning to Write and Publish: An Intercultural Perspective. In
English as an International Language Education [
English Language Education, 33],
► pp. 301 ff.
Fazel, Ismaeil & Joel Heng Hartse
Flowerdew, John
2012.
English for Research Publication Purposes. In
The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,
► pp. 301 ff.
Flowerdew, John
2023.
John Flowerdew's essential bookshelf: English for research publication purposes (ERPP).
Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff.
Frazer-McKee, Gabriel & Kendall Vogh
2022.
Graduate students would benefit from guidelines for preparing conference abstracts.
Working papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York 2
► pp. 89 ff.
García-Ostbye, Ingrid & Barry Pennock-Speck
2022.
A corpus study of the term evidence in open peer reviews to research articles in the British Medical Journal.
Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:1
► pp. 134 ff.
Gardner, Sheena
2016.
Out of the mouths of young learners: an ethical response to occluded classroom practices in researcher-initiated role play.
Language and Education 30:2
► pp. 175 ff.
Gardner, Sheena & Hilary Nesi
2013.
A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing.
Applied Linguistics 34:1
► pp. 25 ff.
Garzone, Giuliana E.
2015.
Genre Analysis. In
The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
Gillett, Andy & Angela Hammond
2009.
Mapping the maze of assessment.
Active Learning in Higher Education 10:2
► pp. 120 ff.
HERBER, Oliver Rudolf, Caroline BRADBURY-JONES, Susanna BÖLING, Sarah COMBES, Julian HIRT, Yvonne KOOP, Ragnhild NYHAGEN, Jessica D. VELDHUIZEN & Julie TAYLOR
2020.
What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.
BMC Medical Research Methodology 20:1
Hewings, Martin
2004.
An ?important contribution? or ?tiresome reading?? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions.
Journal of Applied Linguistics 1:3
► pp. 247 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2012.
ESP and Writing. In
The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,
► pp. 95 ff.
Hyland, Ken & Françoise Salager‐Meyer
2008.
Scientific writing.
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 42:1
► pp. 297 ff.
Hüttner, Julia
2008.
The genre(s) of student writing: developing writing models.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18:2
► pp. 146 ff.
Işık-Taş, Elvan Eda
2020.
The Statement of Purpose in Graduate Program Applications: The Impact of Academics’ Feedback on L2 Writer Identity. In
English for Specific Purposes Instruction and Research,
► pp. 177 ff.
Johns, Ann M.
2012.
The History of English for Specific Purposes Research. In
The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,
► pp. 5 ff.
Kashiha, Hadi
2023.
Beyond words in evaluation: Formulaic language in critical reviews of research articles across disciplines.
Russian Journal of Linguistics 27:2
► pp. 251 ff.
Kashiha, Hadi
2024.
Critical comments in the disciplines: a comparative look at peer review reports in applied linguistics and engineering.
Text & Talk 0:0
Kessler, Matt
2022.
Prospective English language teachers’ projected identities in personal statements plus experienced teachers’ reactions.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1
► pp. 76 ff.
Khan, Ajmal & Tan Bee Tin
2012.
Generic Patterns in Application Letters: the Context of Pakistan.
RELC Journal 43:3
► pp. 393 ff.
Kwan, Becky Siu Chu
2010.
An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: the Hong Kong case.
Higher Education 59:1
► pp. 55 ff.
Lillis, Theresa, Anna Magyar & Anna Robinson‐Pant
2010.
An international journal’s attempts to address inequalities in academic publishing: developing a writing for publication programme.
Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 40:6
► pp. 781 ff.
López Ferrero, Carmen
2023.
Recursos lingüístico-discursivos de la voz del autor en informes universitarios: aprendizaje y evaluación en distintas disciplinas académicas.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93
► pp. 85 ff.
López-Ferrero, Carmen & Carme Bach
2016.
Discourse analysis of statements of purpose: Connecting academic and professional genres.
Discourse Studies 18:3
► pp. 286 ff.
Marinkovich, Juana, Enrique Sologuren & Maha Shawky
2018.
The process of academic literacy in Civil Engineering Informatics: An approach to academic writing and its genres in a learning community.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 74
► pp. 195 ff.
Mathew, Priya, G. R. Kiran & Radhika L. Sankara Narayanan
2022.
Introducing Swalesian Genre-Pedagogy to Arab EFL Learners: A Case Study. In
Individual and Contextual Factors in the English Language Classroom [
English Language Education, 24],
► pp. 235 ff.
McClay, Jill & Clare Dowdall
2019.
Editorial.
Literacy 53:1
► pp. 1 ff.
MOLLE, DANIELLA & PAUL PRIOR
2008.
Multimodal Genre Systems in EAP Writing Pedagogy: Reflecting on a Needs Analysis.
TESOL Quarterly 42:4
► pp. 541 ff.
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar
2019.
The Experience of a NNES Outer Circle Novice Scholar in Scholarly Publication. In
Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication,
► pp. 97 ff.
Mwinlaaru, Isaac Nuokyaa-Ire
Kheradparvar Najmeh & Nasrin, Shokrpour
2015.
The influence of peer reviewers as literacy brokers on the construction of texts for publication in ISI-indexed journals: A study of medical research articles.
Journal of Scientometric Research 4:2
► pp. 48 ff.
Neaderhiser, Stephen
2016.
Conceiving of a Teacherly Identity.
Pedagogy 16:3
► pp. 413 ff.
Nesi, Hilary
2012.
ESP and Corpus Studies. In
The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,
► pp. 407 ff.
NKEMLEKE, DANIEL
2010.
Cameroonian and foreign scholars’ discourse: the rhetoric of conference abstracts.
World Englishes 29:2
► pp. 173 ff.
Okamura, Akiko & Philip Shaw
2000.
Lexical phrases, culture, and subculture in transactional letter writing.
English for Specific Purposes 19:1
► pp. 1 ff.
Ostergaard, Lori & Jim Nugent
2019.
“Other Stories to Tell”: Scholarly Journal Editors as Archivists.
College English
81:4
► pp. 297 ff.
Paltridge, Brian
2015.
Referees' comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: when is a suggestion not a suggestion?.
Studies in Higher Education 40:1
► pp. 106 ff.
Paltridge, Brian
2017.
Peer Review in Academic Settings. In
The Discourse of Peer Review,
► pp. 1 ff.
Payant, Caroline
2017.
Teaching Philosophy Statements: In‐Service ESL Teachers’ Practices and Beliefs.
TESOL Journal 8:3
► pp. 636 ff.
Pecorari, Diane
2003.
Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing.
Journal of Second Language Writing 12:4
► pp. 317 ff.
Peralta, Marco Rossi
2023.
Dificultades sociodiscursivas para la escritura académica en estudiantes universitarios de pregrado y posgrado.
Lengua y Sociedad 22:2
► pp. 335 ff.
Raitskaya, Lilia
2018.
Book review: Brian Paltridge, The Discourse of Peer Review: Reviewing Submissions to Academic Journals.
Discourse & Communication 12:6
► pp. 668 ff.
Russell, David R.
2023.
Motivation and genre as social action: a phenomenological perspective on academic writing.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
Samraj, Betty
2012.
Swales, John M.. In
The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Schreiber, Brooke R., Mohammad Naseh Nasrollahi Shahri & Suresh Canagarajah
2020.
Expanding Academic Discourses: Diverse Englishes, Modalities and Spatial Repertoires. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,
► pp. 437 ff.
Shaw, Oliver
2021.
Misguided Allegiances, Misjudged Weaknesses, and Mixed Messages in Peer Review. In
Scholarly Publication Trajectories of Early-career Scholars,
► pp. 77 ff.
Shaw, P. & A. Okamura
1998.
The letter of submission: avoiding the promotional genre.
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 41:4
► pp. 274 ff.
Shi, Ling
2022.
Rhetorical Structure and Types of Comments in My Manuscript Reviews. In
The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication,
► pp. 143 ff.
Solin, Anna
2018.
Writing in the context of unstable norms: teaching portfolios as a genre of academic recruitment.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:3
► pp. 424 ff.
Sánchez-Jiménez, David
2023.
Comentarios críticos escritos por estudiantes de Medicina sobre la evaluación del paciente.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93
► pp. 1 ff.
Tai, Hsuan-Yu
2016.
A Study on Symbolic Competence and Face in ELF Email Communication. In
Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca,
► pp. 263 ff.
Tatzl, Dietmar
2015.
Case meetings for teaching English for specific academic purposes in a tertiary aeronautical engineering programme.
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 9:3
► pp. 191 ff.
Thieme, Katja
2022.
A Play on Occlusion: Uptake of Letters to the University President.
Rhetoric Review 41:3
► pp. 226 ff.
Tuckley, Lauren, Catherine Salgado, Jessica Edens McCrary & Elise Rudt-Moorty
2024.
Situating Evaluation and Authority: Direct Sponsorship in Letters of Recommendation.
Written Communication 41:2
► pp. 260 ff.
Turner, Heather Noel
2022.
Key-notes: A Content Analysis of ATTW Conferences 1998-2018.
Technical Communication Quarterly 31:4
► pp. 401 ff.
Turner, Joseph
2018.
Delivery, Facilitas, and Copia.
Pedagogy 18:3
► pp. 511 ff.
Vaughan, Elaine & Brian Clancy
2013.
Small Corpora and Pragmatics. In
Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [
Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1],
► pp. 53 ff.
Wang, Qian
2022.
“The very interesting finding suggests that…”: A cognitive frame-based analysis of interest markers by authors’ geo-academic location in applied linguistics research articles.
Frontiers in Psychology 13
Wang, Ying, Hua Chen & T. Pascal Brown
Warchał, Krystyna
2020.
Business and Academic Cultures in Contact: Some Insights from Academic Communication Practices and Research. In
Exploring Business Language and Culture [
Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 219 ff.
Whittemore, Stewart
2012.
2012 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
► pp. 1 ff.
Xu, Xiaoyu
2022.
Differences between novice and experienced academics in their engagement with audience members in conference Q&A sessions.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 60
► pp. 101188 ff.
Yakhontova, Tatyana
2019.
“The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews.
Topics in Linguistics 20:2
► pp. 67 ff.
Yin, Bin
2016.
An exploratory genre analysis of three graduate degree research proposals in applied linguistics.
Functional Linguistics 3:1
Zaśko-Zielińska, Monika
2022.
The Linguistic Analysis of Suicide Notes. In
Language as Evidence,
► pp. 373 ff.
Zhu, Hongqiang, Wei Ren & Zhengrui Han
2016.
The impact of marketization on the communication of Chinese academicians: a genre analytical perspective.
Critical Discourse Studies 13:5
► pp. 467 ff.
Ågerfalk, Pär J.
2019.
Stimulating academic discourse: a call for response.
European Journal of Information Systems 28:1
► pp. 1 ff.
정채관 & Sue Wharton
2012.
Finding Textual Examples of Genres: Issues for Corpus Users.
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 12:1
► pp. 129 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.