Part of
Academic Writing: Intercultural and textual issues
Edited by Eija Ventola and Anna Mauranen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 41] 1996
► pp. 45
Cited by

Cited by 103 other publications

Adamson, John
2012. Mentoring academic journal reviewers: brokering reviewing knowledge. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49:2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Afful, Joseph Benjamin Archibald & Rita Akele Twumasi
2022. The language of evaluation in academic writing research in Ghana, 2000-2020: A synthesis. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 11:4 DOI logo
Albakry, Mohammed
2015. Telling by omission. In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 66],  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Ansary, Hasan & Esmat Babaii
2009. A Cross-cultural Analysis of English Newspaper Editorials. RELC Journal 40:2  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Beer, Bettina, Alexander Kochinka, Carlos Kölbl, Torsten M. Kühlmann, Hede Helfrich, Doris Weidemann, Bernd Spillner, Susanne Günthner, Gabriel Layes, Arnd-Michael Nohl, Heiko Hausendorf, Ralph M. Köhnen, Ulrike Froschauer, Manfred Lueger & Ina Ehnert
2007. Methoden. In Handbuch interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kompetenz,  pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Bex, Tony
1999. The linguistic study of non‐literary genres: The view from the reader. European Journal of English Studies 3:1  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Bharti, Prabhat Kumar, Meith Navlakha, Mayank Agarwal & Asif Ekbal
2023. PolitePEER: does peer review hurt? A dataset to gauge politeness intensity in the peer reviews. Language Resources and Evaluation DOI logo
Bhatia, Vijay K.
2019. Genres and Styles in World Englishes. In The Handbook of World Englishes,  pp. 368 ff. DOI logo
Breeze, Ruth
2019. Chapter 6. Continuity and change. In Science Communication on the Internet [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 308],  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Bruland, Holly H.
2009. Rhetorical Cues and Cultural Clues: An Analysis of the Recommendation Letter in English Studies. Rhetoric Review 28:4  pp. 406 ff. DOI logo
Burgess, Sally
2022. On Mediating and Being Mediated: Experiences of Harmony and Contention. In The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication,  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Castaño Arques, Ana & Carmen López Ferrero
2023. Peer-feedback of an occluded genre in the Spanish language classroom: A case study. Assessing Writing 57  pp. 100756 ff. DOI logo
Cañada, Maria Dolors & Carmen López-Ferrero
2019. Oral discourse competence-in-performance. Language and Dialogue 9:2  pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Cañada Pujols, Maria Dolors & Carme Bach
2022. Marcadores metadiscursivos interaccionales en resúmenes de TFG: ¿indicadores de dominio del género?. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Chan, Hang
2021. A corpus-based approach to comparing English textbook pedagogies: The case of Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of China. Pedagogies: An International Journal 16:3  pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Charlotte, Veronica & Derek Irwin
2019. The Scientific Research Article Publication Process as a Macro-Genre: Outlining the Parameters of Successful and Unsuccessful Communication Between the Writers and the Gatekeeping Readers. In Specialized Discourses and Their Readerships [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Sibo
2017. Disciplinary variations in academic promotional writing: the case of statements of purpose. Functional Linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Chiu, Yuan-Li Tiffany
2019. ‘It’s a match, but is it a good fit?’: admissions tutors’ evaluation of personal statements for PhD study. Oxford Review of Education 45:1  pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Colombini, Crystal Broch
2018. Composing Crisis: Hardship Letters and the Political Economies of Genre. College English 80:3  pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020. The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, DOI logo
DeJeu, Emily Barrow
2024. Topoi of Nonprofit Proposal Writing. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 87:1  pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Ding, Huiling
2017. Cross-Culturally Narrating Risks, Imagination, and Realities of HIV/AIDS. In Emerging Genres in New Media Environments,  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Huiling Ding
2008. The Use of Cognitive and Social Apprenticeship to Teach a Disciplinary Genre. Written Communication 25:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Domenec, Fanny & Philippe Millot
2021. What Is Professional in a Professional Magazine? Using Corpus Analysis to Identify Specializedness in Professional Discourse and Culture. In Good Data in Business and Professional Discourse Research and Teaching,  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Doody, Sara
2024. Navigating Genres in Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Doctoral Programs. Technical Communication Quarterly 33:2  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Doody, Sara & Natasha Artemeva
2022. “Everything Is in the Lab Book”: Multimodal Writing, Activity, and Genre Analysis of Symbolic Mediation in Medical Physics. Written Communication 39:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2020. Laughter through tears: Unprofessional review comments as humor on the ShitMyReviewersSay Twitter account. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:5  pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Englander, Karen & Guadalupe López-Bonilla
2011. Acknowledging or denying membership: Reviewers’ responses to non-anglophone scientists’ manuscripts. Discourse Studies 13:4  pp. 395 ff. DOI logo
Falkenberg, Laura J. & Patricia A. Soranno
2018. Reviewing Reviews: An Evaluation of Peer Reviews of Journal Article Submissions. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 27:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
FARLEY, PETER C.
2016. Genre Analysis of Decision Letters from Editors of Scientific Journals: Building on Flowerdew and Dudley-Evans (2002). Applied Linguistics  pp. amw043 ff. DOI logo
Farnia, Maryam, George Ypsilandis & Bahareh Ghasempour
2019. Intracultural Iranian Persuasion The Case of Scholarship Application Letters. Journal of Intercultural Communication 19:3  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fazel, Ismaeil
2023. Novice Multilingual Writers Learning to Write and Publish: An Intercultural Perspective. In English as an International Language Education [English Language Education, 33],  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Fazel, Ismaeil & Joel Heng Hartse
2020. Gray areas of academic publishing. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 1:2  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Flowerdew, John
2012. English for Research Publication Purposes. In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Flowerdew, John
2023. John Flowerdew's essential bookshelf: English for research publication purposes (ERPP). Language Teaching  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Frazer-McKee, Gabriel & Kendall Vogh
2022. Graduate students would benefit from guidelines for preparing conference abstracts. Working papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York 2  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
García-Ostbye, Ingrid & Barry Pennock-Speck
2022. A corpus study of the term evidence in open peer reviews to research articles in the British Medical Journal. Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:1  pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Gardner, Sheena
2016. Out of the mouths of young learners: an ethical response to occluded classroom practices in researcher-initiated role play. Language and Education 30:2  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Gardner, Sheena & Hilary Nesi
2013. A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing. Applied Linguistics 34:1  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Garzone, Giuliana E.
2015. Genre Analysis. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gillett, Andy & Angela Hammond
2009. Mapping the maze of assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education 10:2  pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
HERBER, Oliver Rudolf, Caroline BRADBURY-JONES, Susanna BÖLING, Sarah COMBES, Julian HIRT, Yvonne KOOP, Ragnhild NYHAGEN, Jessica D. VELDHUIZEN & Julie TAYLOR
2020. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 20:1 DOI logo
Hewings, Martin
2004. An ?important contribution? or ?tiresome reading?? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1:3  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken
2012. ESP and Writing. In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken & Françoise Salager‐Meyer
2008. Scientific writing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 42:1  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Hynninen, Niina
2022. Opening up the peer review process. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Hüttner, Julia
2008. The genre(s) of student writing: developing writing models. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18:2  pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Işık-Taş, Elvan Eda
2020. The Statement of Purpose in Graduate Program Applications: The Impact of Academics’ Feedback on L2 Writer Identity. In English for Specific Purposes Instruction and Research,  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Johns, Ann M.
2012. The History of English for Specific Purposes Research. In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Kashiha, Hadi
2023. Beyond words in evaluation: Formulaic language in critical reviews of research articles across disciplines. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Kashiha, Hadi
2024. Critical comments in the disciplines: a comparative look at peer review reports in applied linguistics and engineering. Text & Talk 0:0 DOI logo
Kessler, Matt
2022. Prospective English language teachers’ projected identities in personal statements plus experienced teachers’ reactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1  pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Khan, Ajmal & Tan Bee Tin
2012. Generic Patterns in Application Letters: the Context of Pakistan. RELC Journal 43:3  pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Kwan, Becky Siu Chu
2010. An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: the Hong Kong case. Higher Education 59:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Lillis, Theresa, Anna Magyar & Anna Robinson‐Pant
2010. An international journal’s attempts to address inequalities in academic publishing: developing a writing for publication programme. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 40:6  pp. 781 ff. DOI logo
López Ferrero, Carmen
2023. Recursos lingüístico-discursivos de la voz del autor en informes universitarios: aprendizaje y evaluación en distintas disciplinas académicas. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
López-Ferrero, Carmen & Carme Bach
2016. Discourse analysis of statements of purpose: Connecting academic and professional genres. Discourse Studies 18:3  pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
Marinkovich, Juana, Enrique Sologuren & Maha Shawky
2018. The process of academic literacy in Civil Engineering Informatics: An approach to academic writing and its genres in a learning community. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 74  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Mathew, Priya, G. R. Kiran & Radhika L. Sankara Narayanan
2022. Introducing Swalesian Genre-Pedagogy to Arab EFL Learners: A Case Study. In Individual and Contextual Factors in the English Language Classroom [English Language Education, 24],  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
McClay, Jill & Clare Dowdall
2019. Editorial. Literacy 53:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
MOLLE, DANIELLA & PAUL PRIOR
2008. Multimodal Genre Systems in EAP Writing Pedagogy: Reflecting on a Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly 42:4  pp. 541 ff. DOI logo
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar
2019. The Experience of a NNES Outer Circle Novice Scholar in Scholarly Publication. In Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication,  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Mwinlaaru, Isaac Nuokyaa-Ire
2017. Bridging boundaries across genre traditions. Functions of Language 24:3  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Kheradparvar Najmeh & Nasrin, Shokrpour
2015. The influence of peer reviewers as literacy brokers on the construction of texts for publication in ISI-indexed journals: A study of medical research articles. Journal of Scientometric Research 4:2  pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Neaderhiser, Stephen
2016. Conceiving of a Teacherly Identity. Pedagogy 16:3  pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Nesi, Hilary
2012. ESP and Corpus Studies. In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
NKEMLEKE, DANIEL
2010. Cameroonian and foreign scholars’ discourse: the rhetoric of conference abstracts. World Englishes 29:2  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Okamura, Akiko & Philip Shaw
2000. Lexical phrases, culture, and subculture in transactional letter writing. English for Specific Purposes 19:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ostergaard, Lori & Jim Nugent
2019. “Other Stories to Tell”: Scholarly Journal Editors as Archivists. College English 81:4  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Paltridge, Brian
2015. Referees' comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: when is a suggestion not a suggestion?. Studies in Higher Education 40:1  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Paltridge, Brian
2017. Peer Review in Academic Settings. In The Discourse of Peer Review,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Paltridge, Brian
2023. Writing a book proposal. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 4:2  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Payant, Caroline
2017. Teaching Philosophy Statements: In‐Service ESL Teachers’ Practices and Beliefs. TESOL Journal 8:3  pp. 636 ff. DOI logo
Pecorari, Diane
2003. Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12:4  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Peralta, Marco Rossi
2023. Dificultades sociodiscursivas para la escritura académica en estudiantes universitarios de pregrado y posgrado. Lengua y Sociedad 22:2  pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Raitskaya, Lilia
2018. Book review: Brian Paltridge, The Discourse of Peer Review: Reviewing Submissions to Academic Journals. Discourse & Communication 12:6  pp. 668 ff. DOI logo
Russell, David R.
2023. Motivation and genre as social action: a phenomenological perspective on academic writing. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Samraj, Betty
2012. Swales, John M.. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Schreiber, Brooke R., Mohammad Naseh Nasrollahi Shahri & Suresh Canagarajah
2020. Expanding Academic Discourses: Diverse Englishes, Modalities and Spatial Repertoires. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,  pp. 437 ff. DOI logo
Shaw, Oliver
2021. Misguided Allegiances, Misjudged Weaknesses, and Mixed Messages in Peer Review. In Scholarly Publication Trajectories of Early-career Scholars,  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Shaw, P. & A. Okamura
1998. The letter of submission: avoiding the promotional genre. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 41:4  pp. 274 ff. DOI logo
Shi, Ling
2022. Rhetorical Structure and Types of Comments in My Manuscript Reviews. In The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication,  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Solin, Anna
2018. Writing in the context of unstable norms: teaching portfolios as a genre of academic recruitment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:3  pp. 424 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Jiménez, David
2023. Comentarios críticos escritos por estudiantes de Medicina sobre la evaluación del paciente. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tai, Hsuan-Yu
2016. A Study on Symbolic Competence and Face in ELF Email Communication. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca,  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Tatzl, Dietmar
2015. Case meetings for teaching English for specific academic purposes in a tertiary aeronautical engineering programme. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 9:3  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Thieme, Katja
2022. A Play on Occlusion: Uptake of Letters to the University President. Rhetoric Review 41:3  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Tuckley, Lauren, Catherine Salgado, Jessica Edens McCrary & Elise Rudt-Moorty
2024. Situating Evaluation and Authority: Direct Sponsorship in Letters of Recommendation. Written Communication 41:2  pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Turner, Heather Noel
2022. Key-notes: A Content Analysis of ATTW Conferences 1998-2018. Technical Communication Quarterly 31:4  pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Turner, Joseph
2018. Delivery, Facilitas, and Copia. Pedagogy 18:3  pp. 511 ff. DOI logo
Vaughan, Elaine & Brian Clancy
2013. Small Corpora and Pragmatics. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1],  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Veret, Thomas
2023. ‘But we’re among peers!’. Language, Culture and Society 5:2  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Qian
2022. “The very interesting finding suggests that…”: A cognitive frame-based analysis of interest markers by authors’ geo-academic location in applied linguistics research articles. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Wang, Ying, Hua Chen & T. Pascal Brown
2022. “We improved presenting voice in our writing”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2  pp. 540 ff. DOI logo
Warchał, Krystyna
2020. Business and Academic Cultures in Contact: Some Insights from Academic Communication Practices and Research. In Exploring Business Language and Culture [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Whittemore, Stewart
2012. 2012 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Xiaoyu
2022. Differences between novice and experienced academics in their engagement with audience members in conference Q&A sessions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 60  pp. 101188 ff. DOI logo
Yakhontova, Tatyana
2019. “The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews. Topics in Linguistics 20:2  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Yin, Bin
2016. An exploratory genre analysis of three graduate degree research proposals in applied linguistics. Functional Linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Zaśko-Zielińska, Monika
2022. The Linguistic Analysis of Suicide Notes. In Language as Evidence,  pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Hongqiang, Wei Ren & Zhengrui Han
2016. The impact of marketization on the communication of Chinese academicians: a genre analytical perspective. Critical Discourse Studies 13:5  pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
Ågerfalk, Pär J.
2019. Stimulating academic discourse: a call for response. European Journal of Information Systems 28:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
정채관 & Sue Wharton
2012. Finding Textual Examples of Genres: Issues for Corpus Users. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 12:1  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.