Part of
Us and Others: Social identities across languages, discourses and culturesEdited by Anna Duszak †
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 98] 2002
► pp. 233–248
Edited by Anna Duszak †
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 98] 2002
► pp. 233–248
Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Fitzgerald, Chris & Martin Mullen
2024. ‘Each of us Is Responsible for all of us’: Solidarity and National Responsibility in Irish Leaders’ COVID Speeches. In The Nation in the Time of the Pandemic, ► pp. 67 ff. 
Szczygłowska, Tatiana
2024. We have to ensure that… A contrastive corpus-based analysis of English situation manipulators and their Polish translation equivalents. Lingua 302 ► pp. 103702 ff.
Beauchamp, David & Sheena Gardner
2023. A trinocular view of the auxiliary verb will in
COVID-19 briefings from Westminster and Holyrood. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 5:1 ► pp. 124 ff.
UȚĂ BĂRBULESCU, OANA & MELANIA ROIBU
2023. Câteva observații despre... noi. Clusivitatea în limba română. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2 ► pp. 306 ff.
Ho, Victor
2022. Strategic use of nouns and pronouns in public discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 51 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. Agreement through Language. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 49 ff.
Formato, Federica
2019. Women in the Public Sphere: Gendered Language. In Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian, ► pp. 135 ff.
Kranert, Michael
2017. ‘Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way. Discourse & Society 28:2 ► pp. 182 ff.
Riboni, Georgia
2015. Enhancing citizen engagement. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256], ► pp. 259 ff.
Bateman, Amanda
2014. Children’s use of Englishwein a primary school in Wales. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 227 ff.
Dieltjens, Sylvain M. & Priscilla C. Heynderickx
2014. We is More Than You Plus I. The Interpretation of the We-Forms in Internal Business Communications. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 44:3 ► pp. 229 ff.
Fetzer, Anita
2014. “Judgeuson whatwedo”: The strategic use of collectivewein British
political discourse. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 331 ff.
Fetzer, Anita
2014. WeandI, andyouandthem: People, power and solidarity. In The Expression of Inequality in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 248], ► pp. 213 ff.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
2014. Replying with the freestanding ‘we’
in Greek conversations. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 159 ff.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
2014. Constructing collectivity with ‘we’: An introduction. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 1 ff.
Rasmussen, Joel
2011. Enabling selves to conduct themselves safely: Safety committee discourse as governmentality in practice. Human Relations 64:3 ► pp. 459 ff.
Fetzer, Anita & Peter Bull
2008. ‘Well, I answer it by simply inviting you to look at the evidence’. Journal of Language and Politics 7:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.