Cover not available
Introduction published In:
The Dynamics of Lexical Innovation: Data, methods, models
Edited by Daphné Kerremans, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger and Hans-Jörg Schmid
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1] 2018
► pp. 1–7
Introduction to the special issue

The dynamics of lexical innovation

Data, methods, models

| Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
| Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
| Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
| Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00004.int
References (16)
References
Cartier, Emmanuel. 2017. Neoveille, a web platform for neologism tracking. Proceedings of the Software Demonstrations of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 95–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change. Harlow & Munich: Longman.Google Scholar
Gérard, Christophe, Lauren Bruneau, Ingrid Falk, Delphine Bernhard & Ann-Lise Rosio. 2017. Le Logoscope : Observatoire des innovations lexicales en français contemporain. In Joaquín García Palacios, Goedele de Sterck, Daniel Linder, Jesús Torre del Rey, Miguel Sánchez Ibanez & Nava Maroto García (eds.), La neología en las lenguas Románicas: Recursos, estrategias y nuevas orientaciones, 339–356. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Andrea Nini & Diansheng Guo. 2016. Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online. English Language and Linguistics 21(1). 99–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Daphné. 2015. A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Daphné & Jelena Prokić. 2018. Mining the web for new words: Semi-automatic neologism identification with the NeoCrawler. Anglia 136(2). 239–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Daphné, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2018. Using data-mining to identify and study patterns in lexical innovation on the web: The NeoCrawler . Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 173–199. [=this volume]Google Scholar
Kjellander, Daniel. 2018. Cognitive constraints in English lexical blending: A data collection methodology and an explanatory model. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 141–172. [=this volume]Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1980. The social origins of sound change. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in space and time, 251–266. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2018. From speaker innovation to lexical change: A sociohistorical approach to neologisms. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 7–28. [=this volume]Google Scholar
Niculescu-Gorpin, Anabella-Gloria & Monica Vasileanu. 2018. Acceptability and diffusion of luxury Anglicisms in present-day Romanian. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 85–120. [=this volume]Google Scholar
Säily, Tanja, Eetu Mäkelä & Mika Hämäläinen. 2018. Explorations into the social contexts of neologism use in early English correspondence. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 29–48. [=this volume]Google Scholar
Svanlund, Jan. 2018. Metalinguistic comments and signals: What can they tell us about the conventionalization of neologies? Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 121–140. [=this volume]Google Scholar
Vejdemo, Susanne. 2018. Lexical change often begins and ends in semantic peripheries: Evidence from color linguistics. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 49–84. [=this volume]Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfried P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar