Article published In:
The Dynamics of Lexical Innovation: Data, methods, models
Edited by Daphné Kerremans, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger and Hans-Jörg Schmid
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1] 2018
► pp. 174200
Algeo, John
1998Vocabulary. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English Language, vol. 31, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 57–91.Google Scholar
Ayto, John
2003Newspapers and neologisms. In Jean Aitchison & Diana M. Lewis (eds.), New media language, 182–187. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald R. & Anneke Neijt
1997Productivity in context: A case study of a Dutch suffix. Linguistics 351. 565–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabré, Maria Teresa & Lluís de Yzaguirre
1995Stratégie pour la détection semiautomatique des néologismes de presse. TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Redaction 81. 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cartier, Emmanuel
2017Neoveille, a web platform for neologism tracking. Proceedings of the Software Demonstrations of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 95–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 (to appear). Néoveille, plateforme de détection, de description et de suivi des néologismes en onze langues. Néologica.Google Scholar
Falk, Ingrid, Delphine Bernhard & Christophe Gérard
2018The Logoscope: A semi-automatic tool for detecting and documenting French new words from the linguistic project to the web interface. Research Report, Université Strasbourg. [URL] [accessed 1 August 2018].
Fischer, Roswitha
1998Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gérard, Christophe, Lauren Bruneau, Ingrid Falk, Delphine Bernhard & Ann-Lise Rosio
2017Le Logoscope : Observatoire des innovations lexicales en français contemporain. In Joaquín García Palacios, Goedele de Sterck, Daniel Linder, Jesús Torre del Rey, Miguel Sánchez Ibanez & Nava Maroto García (eds.), La neología en las lenguas Románicas: Recursos, estrategias y nuevas orientaciones. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 339–356.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William L., Jure Leskovec & Dan Jurafsky
2016Cultural shift or linguistic drift? Comparing two computational models of semantic change. Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing, Austin, Texas, USA, 1–5 November 2016. [URL] [accessed 1 March 2018]. DOI logo
Iakovleva, Tatiana
2017Automatic detection of neologisms in Russian newspaper corpora with Néoveille. Proceedings of the International Conference CORPUS LINGUISTICS – 2017, St Petersburg, 27–30 June 2017, 43–47. [URL] [accessed 1 May 2018].
Janssen, Maarten
2005NeoTrack: Semiautomatic neologism detection. APL Conference 2005, Lisboa, Portugal. [URL] [accessed 15 March 2018].
Jatowt, Adam & Kevin Duh
2014A framework for analysing semantic change of words across time. Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 229–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Daphné
2015A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Daphné, Susanne Stegmayr & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2012The NeoCrawler: Identifying and retrieving neologisms from the internet and monitoring on-going change. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna Robinson (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics, 59–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kerremans, Daphné & Jelena Prokić
2018Mining the web for new words: Semi-automatic neologism identification with the NeoCrawler. Anglia 136(2). 239–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1966The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
1980The social origins of sound change. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 251–266. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2001Principles of linguistic change. Volume II: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levenshtein, Vladimir I.
1965Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 101. 707–710.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, Dirk
2008A three-year study on the freshness of web search engine databases. Journal of Information Science 34(6). 817–831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liao, Xuanyi & Guang Cheng
2016Analysing the semantic change based on word embedding. In Natural language understanding and intelligent applications. Proceedings of the 5th CCF Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, NLPCC 2016, and 24th International Conference on Computer Processing of Oriental Languages, ICCPOL 2016, Kunming, China, December 2–6, 2016, 213–223. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Liu, Tsun-Jui, Shu-Kai Hsieh & Laurent Prevot
2013Observing features of PTT neologisms: A corpus-driven study with N-gram model. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing (ROCLING 2013), 250–259.Google Scholar
Megerdoomian, Karine & Ali Hadjarian
2010Mining and classification of neologisms in Persian blogs. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Creativity (HLT 2010), 6–13.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy
1985Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 211. 339–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2000Mobility, social networks and language change in Early Modern England. European Journal of English Studies 4(3). 253–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2003Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo
1999Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Säily, Tanja, Eetu Mäkelä & Mika Hämäläinen
2018Explorations into the social contexts of neologism use in early English correspondence. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 29–48. [=this volume] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2016English morphology and word-formation: An introduction, 3rd revised and extended edition. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Derek Denis
2014Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90(1). 90–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres-del-Rey, Jesús & Nava Maroto
2014Building the interface between experts and linguists in the detection and characterisation of neology in the field of neurosciences. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Computational Terminology, Dublin, Ireland, August 2014, 64–67. [URL] [accessed 25 March 2018].
Tournier, Jean
1985Introduction Descriptive à la Lexicogénétique de l’Anglais Contemporain. Paris: Champion-Slatkine.Google Scholar
Wilson, Lee
2017Google Freshness Algorithm: Everything you need to know. Search Engine Journal. [URL]. Last accessed August 1, 2018.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Würschinger, Quirin
2021. Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.