Article published in:
Sex, Death & Politics: Taboos in Language
Edited by Melanie Keller, Philipp Striedl, Daniel Biro, Johanna Holzer and Benjamin Weber
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:1] 2021
► pp. 167–192

Borrowing and the historical LGBTQ lexicon

Profile of a pragmatically marked field

Unlike most areas involving taboo, where language-internal innovations tend to dominate, homosexuality is characterized by a basic international vocabulary shared across multiple languages, notably English, French, Italian, Spanish and German. Historically, the lexis of nonnormative gender identity has shared space with that of sexual orientation. This lexicon includes (inexhaustively) the following series of internationalisms: sodomite, bugger, bardash, berdache, tribade, pederast, sapphist, lesbian, uranist, invert, homosexual, bisexual, trans, gay, queer. This common terminology has resulted from language contact in a broad sense, and more specifically from lexical borrowing (loanwords). Several framing devices are expressed through the lexicon: religious censure, distancing in time and space, othering, medicalization or pathologizing, but also in recent decades LGBTQ self-assertion and demands for equality. Rather than necessarily being subject to taboo, then, queerness represents a pragmatically marked semantic field in which the lexicon is highly dependent upon social factors and the communicative context.
Keywords: lexicology, borrowing, loanwords, LGBTQ, gender, homosexuality, pragmatics, taboo
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Lexical analysis
    • 2.1Religious censure
    • 2.2Distancing in time and space
      • 2.2.1Medieval innovations in Romance languages
      • 2.2.2Hellenisms from the early modern period onwards
    • 2.3Nineteenth-century Germanisms and the allure of scientism
    • 2.4Twentieth-century Anglicisms in the fight for self-determination
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00022.vec
References
Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge
2006 Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria
1990 To(o) queer the writer – Loca, escritora y chicana. In AnaLouise Keating (ed.), The Gloria Anzaldúa reader, 163–175. Durham (NC): Duke University Press 2009.Google Scholar
Beachy, Robert
2010 The German invention of homosexuality. Journal of Modern History 82(4). 801–838. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Gay Berlin: Birthplace of a modern identity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Harry
1953 Transvestism and transsexualism. International Journal of Sexology 7(1). 12–14.Google Scholar
1954 Transsexualism and transvestism as psycho-somatic and somato-psychic syndromes. American Journal of Psychotherapy 8(2). 219–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benkert, Karl-Maria
[attributed] 1869 Das Gemeinschädliche des §143 des Preussischen Strafgesetzbuches vom 14. April 1851 und daher seine nothwendige Tilgung als §152 im Entwurfe eines Strafgesetzbuches für den Norddeutschen Bund. Leipzig: Serbe.Google Scholar
Blank, Andreas
1997 Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, Marie-Jo
1981 Un choix sans équivoque. Recherches historiques sur les relations amoureuses entre les femmes, XVIe-XXe siècle. Paris: Denoël.Google Scholar
Boswell, John
1980 Christianity, social tolerance, and homosexuality: Gay people in Western Europe from the beginning of the Christian era to the fourteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourcier, M.-H.
2011 Queer Zones 3. Identités, cultures et politiques. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Braunschneider, Theresa
1999 The macroclitoride, the tribade and the woman: Configuring gender and sexuality in English anatomical discourse. Textual Practice 13(3). 509–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broussais, François-Joseph-Victor
1839 De l’irritation et de la folie, vol. 11, 2nd edn. by Casimir Broussais. Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald
1998 Cary Grant and the emergence of gay “homosexual”. Dictionaries 19(1). 188–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casas Gómez, Miguel
2009 Towards a new approach to the linguistic definition of euphemism. Language Sciences 311. 725–739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The expressive creativity of euphemism and dysphemism. Lexis: E-Journal in English Lexicology 71. 43–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casper, Johann
1858 Practisches Handbuch der gerichtlichen Medicin. Biologischer Theil. Berlin: Hirschwald.Google Scholar
Cauldwell, David
1949 Psychopathia transexualis. Sexology: Sex Science Magazine 16(5). 274–280.Google Scholar
Charcot, Jean-Martin & Valentin Magnan
1882 Inversion du sens génital. Archives de Neurologie 3(7). 53–60 and 4(12). 296–322.Google Scholar
Chauncey, George
1994 Gay New York: Gender, urban culture, and the making of the gay male world, 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Julien
1891 De l’inversion sexuelle aux points de vue clinique, anthropologique et médico-légal. Part 2. Archives d’Anthropologie Criminelle 61. 49–69.Google Scholar
Chiffoleau, Jacques
1990 Dire l’indicible. Remarques sur la catégorie du nefandum du XIIe au XVe siècle. Annales: Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 45(2). 289–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996  Contra naturam. Pour une approche casuistique et procédurale de la nature médiévale. Micrologus 41. 265–312.Google Scholar
Clave
2012 = Diccionario Clave. Diccionario de uso del español actual. Paris: SM/Ophrys.Google Scholar
Courouve, Claude
1985 Vocabulaire de l’homosexualité masculine. Paris: Payot. Updated PDF version: Dictionnaire français de l’homosexualité masculine. N.p.: In Libro Veritas 2013.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa
1991 Queer Theory: Lesbian and gay sexualities. An introduction. Differences 3(2). iii–xviii.Google Scholar
Derks, Paul
1990 Die Schande der heiligen Päderastie. Homosexualität und Öffentlichkeit in der deutschen Literatur, 1750–1850. Berlin: Rosa Winkel.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Emma
1993 Passions between women: British lesbian culture, 1668–1801. London: Scarlet Press.Google Scholar
Dubarry, Armand
1896 Les invertis. Le vice allemand. Paris: Chamuel.Google Scholar
Duden
2011 = Deutsches Universalwörterbuch, 7th edn. Mannheim: Duden.Google Scholar
Ellis, Havelock
1915 Sexual inversion, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Davis.Google Scholar
Eribon, Didier
(ed.) 2003 Dictionnaire des cultures gays et lesbiennes. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Féray, Jean-Claude
2004  Grecques, les mœurs du hanneton? Histoire du mot pédérastie et de ses dérivés en langue française . Paris: Quintes-Feuilles.Google Scholar
Haggerty, George
(ed.) 2000 Gay histories and cultures: An encyclopedia. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Heine, Matthias
2014 Sind sie LGBTI? Oder eine sexuelle Zwischenstufe? Welt 18 June. www​.welt​.de​/kultur​/article129201953​/Sind​-sie​-LGBTI​-Oder​-eine​-sexuelle​-Zwischenstufe​.html
Hennig, Jean-Luc
2014 Espadons, mignons et autres monstres. Vocabulaire de l’homosexualité masculine sous l’Ancien Régime. Paris: Cherche Midi.Google Scholar
Herzer, Manfred
1987 Ein Brief von Kertbeny in Hannover an Ulrichs in Würzburg. Capri: Zeitschrift für schwule Geschichte 1(1). 25–35.Google Scholar
2000 Karl Maria Kertbeny: Schriften zur Homosexualitätsforschung. Berlin: Rosa Winkel.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Magnus
1903 Ursachen und Wesen des Uranismus. Jahrbuch für Sexuelle Zwischenstufen 5(1). 1–193.Google Scholar
1904 Das Ergebnis der statistischen Untersuchungen über den Prozentsatz der Homosexuellen. Jahrbuch für Sexuelle Zwischenstufen 61. 109–178.Google Scholar
1910 Die Transvestiten. Eine Untersuchung über den erotischen Verkleidungstrieb. Berlin: Pulvermacher.Google Scholar
1923 Die intersexuelle Konstitution. Jahrbuch für Sexuelle Zwischenstufen 231. 3–27.Google Scholar
Jordan, Mark
1997 The invention of sodomy in Christian theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jonathan Ned
2007 [1995] The invention of heterosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Hubert
2002 Karl Heinrich Ulrichs: Pioneer of the modern gay movement. San Francisco: Peremptory Publications.Google Scholar
Krafft-Ebing, Richard von
1886 Psychopathia Sexualis. Leipzig: Enke.Google Scholar
1896 Ueber Unzucht mit Kindern und Pädophilia erotica. Friedreich’s Blätter für Gerichtliche Medicin und Sanitätspolizei 471. 261–283.Google Scholar
Legman, Gershon
1941 The language of homosexuality: An American glossary. In George Henry, Sex variants: A study of homosexual patterns, 1st edn., vol. 21, 1149–1179 (Appendix VII). New York: Hoeber.Google Scholar
LEI = Pfister, Max & Wolfgang Schweickard
(eds.) 1979– Lessico etimologico italiano. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Lo Vecchio, Nicholas
2018 Review of Shana Poplack, Borrowing (2018). Revue de Linguistique Romane 821. 521–525.Google Scholar
2020 Dictionnaire historique du lexique de l’homosexualité. Transferts linguistiques et culturels entre français, italien, espagnol, anglais et allemand. Strasbourg: ELiPhi.Google Scholar
2021 Updating the OED on the historical LGBTQ lexicon. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America 42(1). 95–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Revisiting berdache: Notes on a translinguistic lexical creation. American Speech. Crossref
Martineau, Louis
1884 Leçons sur les déformations vulvaires et anales produites par la masturbation, le saphisme, la défloration et la sodomie. Paris: Delahaye/Lecrosnier.Google Scholar
Masson, Michel
2015  Barda, bardache et bredindin. La “base” BRD dans les langues romanes. La Linguistique 51(1). 41–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matzner, Sebastian
2010 From uranians to homosexuals: Philhellenism, Greek homoeroticism and gay emancipation in Germany, 1835–1915. Classical Receptions 2(1). 60–91.Google Scholar
2015 Of that I know many examples…: On the relationship of Greek theory and Roman practices in Karl Heinrich Ulrichs’s writings on the third sex. In Jennifer Ingleheart (ed.), Ancient Rome and the construction of modern homosexual identities, 93–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Helen Baker
2017 The public representation of homosexual men in seventeenth-century England: A corpus-based view. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 3(2). 197–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, Cameron
1997 The sodomite in fiction and satire, 1660–1750. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Joseph
1843 Das große Conversations-Lexicon, vol. 41. Hildburghausen: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Meyerowitz, Joanne
2002 How sex changed: A history of transsexuality in the United States. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moll, Albert
1893 Les perversions de l’instinct génital. Étude sur l’inversion sexuelle, trans. from the German by Florentin Pactet and Romain Romme. Paris: Carré.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2021 Language and sexuality studies today: Why “homosexual” is a bad word and why “queer linguist” is not an identity. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10(1). 25–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mutel, D.-Ph.
1843 Éléments d’hygiène militaire. Paris: Forton, Masson.Google Scholar
Nossem, Eva
2019  Queer, frocia, femminiellə, ricchione et al.: Localizing “queer” in the Italian context. Gender/Sexuality/Italy 61. www​.gendersexualityitaly​.com​/1​-queer​-frocia​-femminiellə​-ricchione​-et​-al​-localizing​-queer​-in​-the​-italian​-context/
OED = Oxford English Dictionary
. 3rd edn., online. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021.Google Scholar
Öhmann, Emil
1974 Der romanische Einfluß auf das Deutsche bis zum Ausgang des Mittelalters. In Friedrich Maurer & Heinz Rupp (eds.), Deutsche Wortgeschichte, vol. 11, 321–396. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Glenn
2011 Of sodomites, effeminates, hermaphrodites, and androgynes: Sodomy in the age of Peter Damian. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine
1997 The rediscovery of the clitoris: French medicine and the tribade, 1570–1620. In David Hillman & Carla Mazzio (eds.), The body in parts: Fantasies of corporeality in early modern Europe, 171–193. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petit Robert
2018 = Alain Rey & Josette Rey-Debove (eds.). Le Petit Robert (2019 edn.). Paris: Robert.Google Scholar
Puff, Helmut
2003 Sodomy in Reformation Germany and Switzerland, 1400–1600. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2004 Nature on trial: Acts “against nature” in the law courts of early modern Germany and Switzerland. In Lorraine Daston & Fernando Vidal (eds.), The moral authority of nature, 232–253. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-González, Félix
2008 Diccionario gay-lésbico. Vocabulario general y argot de la homosexualidad. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Schachter, Marc
2015 Lesbian philology in early print commentaries on Juvenal and Martial. In Jennifer Ingleheart (ed.), Ancient Rome and the construction of modern homosexual identities, 39–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Alcuni anelli mancanti del discorso lesbico: i primi commenti a stampa sopra Giovenale. In Umberto Grassi, Vincenzo Lagioia & Gian Paolo Romagnani (eds.), Tribadi, sodomiti, invertite e invertiti, pederasti, femminelle, ermafroditi… Per una storia dell’omosessualità, della bisessualità e delle trasgressioni di genere in Italia, 29–40. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Simes, Gary
1996 “Gay’s the word”: A history of gay in dictionary form. In Garry Wotherspoon (ed.), Gay and lesbian perspectives III: Essays in Australian culture, 303–347. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Skinner, Jody
1999 Bezeichnungen für das Homosexuelle im Deutschen, vol. 21. Essen: Blaue Eule.Google Scholar
Tamassia, Arrigo
1878 Sull’inversione dell’istinto sessuale. Rivista Sperimentale di Freniatria e di Medicina Legale 41. 97–117.Google Scholar
1881 Sull’inversione dell’istinto sessuale. Rassegna. Rivista Sperimentale di Freniatria e di Medicina Legale 7(4). 285–291.Google Scholar
Thibault, André & Nicholas Lo Vecchio
2020 Language contact and the lexicon of Romance languages. The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Wesley & Sue-Ellen Jacobs
1999 “…And we are still here”: From berdache to Two-Spirit people.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 23(2). 91–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tin, Louis-Georges
(ed.) 2003 Dictionnaire de l’homophobie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
TLF = Imbs, Paul & Bernard Quemada
(eds.) 1971–1994 Trésor de la langue française. Paris: CNRS. ATILF-CNRS/Université de Lorraine, http://​atilf​.atilf​.fr
Traub, Valerie
2002 The renaissance of lesbianism in early modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turton, Stephen
2020 The confessional sciences: Scientific lexicography and sexology in the Oxford English Dictionary . Language & History 63(3). 214–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, Sharon
1995 “The twentieth century way”: Female impersonation and sexual practice in turn-of-the-century America. Journal of the History of Sexuality 5(4). 573–600.Google Scholar
Ulrichs, Karl Heinrich
[signed Numa Numantius] 1864–1865 Forschungen über das Räthsel der mannmännlichen Liebe, 51 vols. Leipzig: Selbstverlag/Matthes.Google Scholar
1899 [1862] Vier Briefe. Jahrbuch für Sexuelle Zwischenstufen 11. 36–70.Google Scholar
Walter, Tilmann
2012 Der Sexualwortschatz im Frühneuhochdeutschen. In Jochen Bär & Marcus Müller (eds.), Geschichte der Sprache – Sprache der Geschichte. Probleme und Perspektiven der historischen Sprachwissenschaft des Deutschen, 239–304. Berlin: Akademie. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael
(ed.) 1993 Introduction. In Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory, vii–xxxi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Carl
1869 Die conträre Sexualempfindung. Symptom eines neuropathischen (psychopathischen) Zustandes. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 2(1). 73–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiesnerová, Vendula
2012 LGBTQ activism and the appropriation of Queer Theory in Spain. In Sushila Mesquita, Maria Katharina Wiedlack & Katrin Lasthofer (eds.), Import-Export-Transport: Queer theory, queer critique and activism in motion, 163–178. Vienna: Zaglossus.Google Scholar
Zerner, Monique
1989 Du court moment où on appela les hérétiques des “bougres”. Et quelques déductions. Cahiers de Civilisation Médiévale 321. 305–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zingarelli
2007 = Lo Zingarelli: Vocabolario della lingua italiana, 12th edn. (2008 edn.), updated by Mario Cannella (ed.). Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar