Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses: Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Piasecki
[Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2] 2022
► pp. 181–194
Introduction

Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses

Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives

| University of the West of England
| University of the West of England
| University of the West of England
| University of the West of England


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 11 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00025.bee
References (42)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. ‘Well I’m not sure I think…’. The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(2). 231–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Understanding pragmatic markers. A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds.). 2006. Pragmatic markers in contrast. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2015. Variability in native and non-native use of pragmatic markers: The example of well in role-play data. In Kate Beeching & Helen Woodfield (eds.), Researching sociopragmatic variability. Perspectives from variational, interlanguage and contrastive pragmatics, 174–200. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges (eds.). 2015. Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Butterworth, Brian. 1980. Evidence from pauses in speech. In Brian Butterworth (ed.), Language production (vol. 11), 155–176. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buysse, Lieven. 2020. ‘It was a bit stressy as well actually’: The pragmatic markers actually and in fact in spoken learner English. Journal of Pragmatics 1561. 28–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Jean E. Fox Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 841. 73–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, William & Jeanne Paccia-Cooper. 1980. Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corley, Martin & Oliver W. Stewart. 2008. Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um . Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4). 589–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corley, Martin & Robert Hartsuiker. 2011. Why um helps auditory word recognition: The temporal delay hypothesis. PLos ONE 6(5): e19792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denke, Annika. 2009. Native-like performance: Pragmatic markers, repair and repetition in native and non-native English speech. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr Müller.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Andrea Sansó (eds.). 2017. Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed). 2006. Approaches to discourse particles. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, Loretta & Ronald Carter. 2007. Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics 28(3). 410–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda. 1961. Hesitation and information in speech. In Colin Cherry (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th London Symposium on Information Theory, 162–174. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
. 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Lamar A. 2018. Variation in hesitation: The case of este vs. eh in Latin American Spanish. Spanish in Context 15(1). 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela. 1994. Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2). 1313–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Alan, Frieda Goldman-Eisler & Andrew Skarbek. 1965. Temporal patterns of cognitive activity and breath control in speech. Language and Speech 81. 236–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1966. Sequential temporal patterns in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 91. 207–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jehoul, Annelies, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts. 2017. Gaze patterns and filled pauses: Empirical data on the difference between Dutch euh and euhm . In Proceedings of the 4th European and 7th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication (MMSYM2016), 43–50.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, Minna, Ludivine Crible & Kate Beeching. 2022. Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effect of exposure on the perception and production of um . Language and Speech 65(2). 263–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauwers, Peter, Gudrun Vanderbauwhede & Stijn Verleyen (eds.). 2012. Pragmatic markers and pragmaticalization: Lessons from false friends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1983. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 141. 41–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liao, Silvie. 2009. Variation in the use of discourse markers by Chinese teaching assistants in the US. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 1313–1328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merlo, Sandra & Plínio A. Barbosa. 2010. Hesitation phenomena: A dynamical perspective. Cognitive Processing 11(3). 251–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone. 2005. Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrie, Helen. 1987. The psycholinguistics of speaking. In John Lyons, Richard Coates, Margaret Deuchar & Gerald Gazdar (eds.), New horizons in linguistics (vol. 21), 336–366. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pichler, Heike (ed.). 2016. Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speer, Shari R., Paul Warren & Amy J. Schafer. 2011. Situationally independent prosodic phrasing. Laboratory Phonology 2(1). 35–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swerts, Marc. 1998. Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 30(4). 485–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonetti Tübben, Ilenia & Daniela Landert. 2022. Uh and um as pragmatic markers in dialogues: A contrastive perspective on the functions of planners in fiction and conversation. Contrastive Pragmatics. 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 2019. From pause to word: Uh, um and er in written American English. English Language and Linguistics 23(1). 105–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaides, Kristina Denisovna. 2022. Hesitative markers eto and eto samoe: Structural and temporal aspects. Коммуникативные исследования 9 (1). 49–66.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Beradze, Marianna & Natalia Meir
2024. Disfluencies as a Window into Pragmatic Skills in Russian-Hebrew Bilingual Autistic and Non-Autistic Children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders DOI logo
Koteyko, Nelya, Martine Van Driel, Sofia Billan, Belen Barros Pena & John Vines
2024. Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users. Autism in Adulthood DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.