Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses: Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Piasecki
[Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2] 2022
► pp. 181–194
Introduction

Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses

Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives

| University of the West of England
| University of the West of England
| University of the West of England
| University of the West of England


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 11 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00025.bee
References
Aijmer, Karin
2002 English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 ‘Well I’m not sure I think…’. The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(2). 231–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Understanding pragmatic markers. A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
(eds.) 2006 Pragmatic markers in contrast. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
1996 Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2015 Variability in native and non-native use of pragmatic markers: The example of well in role-play data. In Kate Beeching & Helen Woodfield (eds.), Researching sociopragmatic variability. Perspectives from variational, interlanguage and contrastive pragmatics, 174–200. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges
(eds.) 2015 Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Butterworth, Brian
1980 Evidence from pauses in speech. In Brian Butterworth (ed.), Language production (vol. 11), 155–176. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buysse, Lieven
2020 ‘It was a bit stressy as well actually’: The pragmatic markers actually and in fact in spoken learner English. Journal of Pragmatics 1561. 28–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Jean E. Fox Tree
2002 Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 841. 73–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, William & Jeanne Paccia-Cooper
1980 Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corley, Martin & Oliver W. Stewart
2008 Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um . Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4). 589–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corley, Martin & Robert Hartsuiker
2011 Why um helps auditory word recognition: The temporal delay hypothesis. PLos ONE 6(5): e19792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denke, Annika
2009 Native-like performance: Pragmatic markers, repair and repetition in native and non-native English speech. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr Müller.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Andrea Sansó
(eds.) 2017 Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed) 2006 Approaches to discourse particles. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, Loretta & Ronald Carter
2007 Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics 28(3). 410–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda
1961 Hesitation and information in speech. In Colin Cherry (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th London Symposium on Information Theory, 162–174. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
1968 Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Lamar A.
2018 Variation in hesitation: The case of este vs. eh in Latin American Spanish. Spanish in Context 15(1). 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela
1994 Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2). 1313–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Alan, Frieda Goldman-Eisler & Andrew Skarbek
1965 Temporal patterns of cognitive activity and breath control in speech. Language and Speech 81. 236–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1966 Sequential temporal patterns in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 91. 207–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jehoul, Annelies, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2017 Gaze patterns and filled pauses: Empirical data on the difference between Dutch euh and euhm . In Proceedings of the 4th European and 7th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication (MMSYM2016), 43–50.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, Minna, Ludivine Crible & Kate Beeching
2022 Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effect of exposure on the perception and production of um . Language and Speech 65(2). 263–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauwers, Peter, Gudrun Vanderbauwhede & Stijn Verleyen
(eds.) 2012 Pragmatic markers and pragmaticalization: Lessons from false friends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M.
1983 Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 141. 41–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liao, Silvie
2009 Variation in the use of discourse markers by Chinese teaching assistants in the US. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 1313–1328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merlo, Sandra & Plínio A. Barbosa
2010 Hesitation phenomena: A dynamical perspective. Cognitive Processing 11(3). 251–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone
2005 Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrie, Helen
1987 The psycholinguistics of speaking. In John Lyons, Richard Coates, Margaret Deuchar & Gerald Gazdar (eds.), New horizons in linguistics (vol. 21), 336–366. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pichler, Heike
(ed.) 2016 Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speer, Shari R., Paul Warren & Amy J. Schafer
2011 Situationally independent prosodic phrasing. Laboratory Phonology 2(1). 35–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swerts, Marc
1998 Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 30(4). 485–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonetti Tübben, Ilenia & Daniela Landert
2022  Uh and um as pragmatic markers in dialogues: A contrastive perspective on the functions of planners in fiction and conversation. Contrastive Pragmatics. 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel
2019 From pause to word: Uh, um and er in written American English. English Language and Linguistics 23(1). 105–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaides, Kristina Denisovna
2022 Hesitative markers eto and eto samoe: Structural and temporal aspects. Коммуникативные исследования 9 (1). 49–66.Google Scholar