Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 30:2 (2023) ► pp.330–352

Levels of metaphor in gesture

| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
The present contribution integrates a recent, multilevel approach to metaphor advanced by Kövecses (2017 and later publications), with gestures as a mode of metaphorical expression. In doing so, the paper shows how different elements of conceptual structure, varying from the abstract, recurring image schema, through more complex conceptual domains and frames, to contextually embedded and variable metaphorical scenarios, participate in the metaphoricity of gestures. This application of gestures to the multilevel approach lends direct support to the idea that human conceptual system recruits various semiotic modes – not limited to language – for expressing its content. Image schemas of object and source-path-goal have been shown to participate directly in the domain of transfer, which, when embedded in context of a given communicative situation, has become the conceptual frame of coming out. The frame, when realised via different gestural forms in a shared context across many speakers, turns into a highly context-sensitive, variable, and speech co-expressive gestural metaphorical scenario of coming out is showing an object.
Keywords: conceptual structure, levels of schematicity, extended conceptual metaphor theory, gesture analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Levels of schematicity
    • 2.1Image schemas
    • 2.2Domains
    • 2.3Frames
    • 2.4Scenarios
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Levels of metaphor in gesture
    • 4.1Image schema
    • 4.2Domains
    • 4.3Frames
    • 4.4Scenarios
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Note
  • Bibliography
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 11 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00033.dyr
References (78)
Bibliography
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2023. What’s really in a frame? The case of public marriage proposals. Discourse Studies 25(2). 273–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet. 1994. Gestures as part of speech: Methodological implications. Research on Language & Social Interaction 27(3). 201–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, Jana. 2021. Repetitions in gesture: A cognitive-linguistic and usage-based perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael P. 2000. Closet space: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien, Kim Hyunji, Iris Hübscher & Bodo Winter. 2023. Gestures are modulated by social context: A study of multimodal politeness across two cultures. Gesture 21(2/3). 167–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Metaphors of Brexit: No cherries on the cake? New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirrey, Deborah. 2012. Reading the script. An analysis of script formulation in coming out advice texts. Journal of Language and Sexuality 1(1). 35–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Metaphors we come out by: how structural metaphors construct coming out in internet advice texts. Gender and Language 14(1). 8–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chui, Kawaii. 2012. Gestural manifestation of knowledge in conceptual frames. Discourse Processes 49(8). 599–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan. 2017. Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Image schemas and gesture. In Beate Hampe & Joseph. E. Grady (eds.), From perception to meaning, 421–442. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Why study metaphor and gesture? In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 5–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11(2). 417–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clausner, Timothy C. & William Croft. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1). 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Debreslioska, Sandra & Marianne Gullberg. 2020. The semantic content of gestures varies with definiteness, information status and clause structure. Journal of Pragmatics 1681. 36–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyrmo, Tomasz. 2022a. A multilevel cognitive model of coming out. Prace Językoznawcze 24(4). 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022b. Gestural metaphorical scenarios and coming out narratives. Metaphor and the Social World 12(1). 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. Metaphors of coming out in Polish: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 24(1). 94–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2015. The crucible of language: How language and mind create meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Cognitive linguistics: A complete guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2801. 20–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. J. & Collin Baker. 2012. A frames approach to semantic analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawne, Lauren. 2021. ‘Away’ gestures associated with negative expressions in narrative discourse in Syuba (Kagate, nepal) speakers. Semiotica 2021(239). 37–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerwing, Jennifer & Janet Bavelas. 2004. Linguistic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture 4(2). 157–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. W. 2008. Images schemas in conceptual development: What happened to the body? Philosophical Psychology 21(2). 231–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. Metaphors in the flesh: Metaphorical pantomimes in sports celebrations. Cognitive Linguistics 32(1). 67–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 2022. Metaphorical experience. Contiguity or cross-domain mappings? Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 7–32.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2018. The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinnell, Jennifer. 2018. The multimodal marking of aspect: The case of five periphrastic auxiliary constructions in North American English. Cognitive Linguistics 29(4). 773–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017. Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inbar, Anna & Yael Maschler. 2023. Shared knowledge as an account for disaffiliative moves: Hebrew ki ‘because’-clauses accompanied by the Palm-Up Open-Hand gesture. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(2). 141–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 281. 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020a. An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(1). 112–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, Silva. H. 2011. Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes 61. Available at [URL]. DOI logo
2014. 121. The cyclic gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK)], 1605–1618. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. The neural theory of metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 17–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, Michael. 2017. ‘My coming out story’: Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth identities on YouTube. International Journal of Cultural Studies 22(1). 1–16.Google Scholar
Łozińska, Joanna. 2021. Imagery underlying metaphors: A cognitive study of a multimodal discourse of yoga classes. Metaphor & Symbol 36(3). 150–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Jammie. 2014. Communicating sexual identities: A typology of coming out. Sexuality & Culture 19(1). 122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez de Leon, Celia & Alba Fernandez Santana. 2021. Embodied cognition in the booth: Referential and pragmatic gestures in simultaneous interpreting. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8(2). 277–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masi, Silvia. 2020. Exploring meaning-making practices via co-speech gestures in TED Talks. Journal of Visual Literacy 39(3–4). 201–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160047. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica 2019(228). 193–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene & Gina Joue. 2017. Source actions ground metaphor via metonymy: Toward a frame-based account of gestural action in multimodal discourse. In Beate Hampe (ed.), Metaphor, 119–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2017a. Waking metaphors: Embodied cognition in multimodal discourse. In B. Hampe (ed.), Metaphor, 297–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Truths, lies and figurative scenarios: Metaphors at the heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics 16(5). 641–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. National conceptualisations of the body politic: Cultural experience and political imagination. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parril, Fey & Stec Kashmiri. 2018. Seeing first person changes gesture but saying first person does not. Gesture 17(1). 158–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schröder, Urlike. 2017. Multimodal metaphors as cognitive pivots for the construction of cultural otherness in talk. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(4). 493–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. 2017. Cultural linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Karen. 2013. Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szwedek, Aleksander. 2014. The nature of domains and the relationships between them in metaphorization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 342–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Complex image schemas. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium. 4(1). 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Thematic roles in image schemas: A missing link between mind and language. Cognitive Semantics 8(1). 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Javier, Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas, Inés Olza & Daniel Alcaraz Carrión. 2020. Gesturing in the wild: Evidence for a flexible mental timeline. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehling, Elisabeth. 2009. Argument is Gesture War: Function, form and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 35( 2 ). 54–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Discourse management gestures. Gesture 16(2). 245–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Bodo, Marcus Perlman & Teenie Matlock. 2013. Using space to talk and gesture about numbers: Evidence from the TV News Archive. Gesture 13(3). 377–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan. 2007. Intersubjectivity, mimetic schemas and the emergence of language. Intellectica. Revue de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive 46(2). 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Image schemas, mimetic schemas and children’s gestures. Cognitive Semiotics 7(1). 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dyrmo, Tomasz
2024. Figurativeness of the Japanese flag. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.