Cover not available
Article In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 30:2 (2023) ► pp.330–352

Levels of metaphor in gesture

| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

The present contribution integrates a recent, multilevel approach to metaphor advanced by Kövecses (2017 and later publications), with gestures as a mode of metaphorical expression. In doing so, the paper shows how different elements of conceptual structure, varying from the abstract, recurring image schema, through more complex conceptual domains and frames, to contextually embedded and variable metaphorical scenarios, participate in the metaphoricity of gestures. This application of gestures to the multilevel approach lends direct support to the idea that human conceptual system recruits various semiotic modes – not limited to language – for expressing its content. Image schemas of object and source-path-goal have been shown to participate directly in the domain of transfer, which, when embedded in context of a given communicative situation, has become the conceptual frame of coming out. The frame, when realised via different gestural forms in a shared context across many speakers, turns into a highly context-sensitive, variable, and speech co-expressive gestural metaphorical scenario of coming out is showing an object.

Keywords: conceptual structure, levels of schematicity, extended conceptual metaphor theory, gesture analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Levels of schematicity
    • 2.1Image schemas
    • 2.2Domains
    • 2.3Frames
    • 2.4Scenarios
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Levels of metaphor in gesture
    • 4.1Image schema
    • 4.2Domains
    • 4.3Frames
    • 4.4Scenarios
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Note
  • Bibliography
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References

Bibliography

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2023 What’s really in a frame? The case of public marriage proposals. Discourse Studies 25(2). 273–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet
1994 Gestures as part of speech: Methodological implications. Research on Language & Social Interaction 27(3). 201–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, Jana
2021 Repetitions in gesture: A cognitive-linguistic and usage-based perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael P.
2000 Closet space: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien, Kim Hyunji, Iris Hübscher & Bodo Winter
2023 Gestures are modulated by social context: A study of multimodal politeness across two cultures. Gesture 21(2/3). 167–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2005 Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Metaphors of Brexit: No cherries on the cake? New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirrey, Deborah
2012 Reading the script. An analysis of script formulation in coming out advice texts. Journal of Language and Sexuality 1(1). 35–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Metaphors we come out by: how structural metaphors construct coming out in internet advice texts. Gender and Language 14(1). 8–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chui, Kawaii
2012 Gestural manifestation of knowledge in conceptual frames. Discourse Processes 49(8). 599–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan
2017 Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Image schemas and gesture. In Beate Hampe & Joseph. E. Grady (eds.), From perception to meaning, 421–442. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Why study metaphor and gesture? In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 5–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11(2). 417–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clausner, Timothy C. & William Croft
1999 Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1). 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse
2004 Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Debreslioska, Sandra & Marianne Gullberg
2020 The semantic content of gestures varies with definiteness, information status and clause structure. Journal of Pragmatics 1681. 36–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2022a A multilevel cognitive model of coming out. Prace Językoznawcze 24(4). 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022b Gestural metaphorical scenarios and coming out narratives. Metaphor and the Social World 12(1). 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023 Metaphors of coming out in Polish: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 24(1). 94–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan
2015 The crucible of language: How language and mind create meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Cognitive linguistics: A complete guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. J.
1976 Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2801. 20–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. J. & Collin Baker
2012 A frames approach to semantic analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawne, Lauren
2021 ‘Away’ gestures associated with negative expressions in narrative discourse in Syuba (Kagate, nepal) speakers. Semiotica 2021(239). 37–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerwing, Jennifer & Janet Bavelas
2004 Linguistic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture 4(2). 157–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. W.
2008 Images schemas in conceptual development: What happened to the body? Philosophical Psychology 21(2). 231–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 Metaphors in the flesh: Metaphorical pantomimes in sports celebrations. Cognitive Linguistics 32(1). 67–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
2022 Metaphorical experience. Contiguity or cross-domain mappings? Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 7–32.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. E.
1995 Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2019 Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon
2018 The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinnell, Jennifer
2018 The multimodal marking of aspect: The case of five periphrastic auxiliary constructions in North American English. Cognitive Linguistics 29(4). 773–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2017 Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inbar, Anna & Yael Maschler
2023 Shared knowledge as an account for disaffiliative moves: Hebrew ki ‘because’-clauses accompanied by the Palm-Up Open-Hand gesture. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(2). 141–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987 The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 281. 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020a An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(1). 112–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020b Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, Silva. H.
2011 Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes 61. Available at [URL]. DOI logo
2014 121. The cyclic gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK)], 1605–1618. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1996 Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2008 The neural theory of metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 17–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, Michael
2017 ‘My coming out story’: Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth identities on YouTube. International Journal of Cultural Studies 22(1). 1–16.Google Scholar
Łozińska, Joanna
2021 Imagery underlying metaphors: A cognitive study of a multimodal discourse of yoga classes. Metaphor & Symbol 36(3). 150–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Jammie
2014 Communicating sexual identities: A typology of coming out. Sexuality & Culture 19(1). 122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez de Leon, Celia & Alba Fernandez Santana
2021 Embodied cognition in the booth: Referential and pragmatic gestures in simultaneous interpreting. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8(2). 277–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masi, Silvia
2020 Exploring meaning-making practices via co-speech gestures in TED Talks. Journal of Visual Literacy 39(3–4). 201–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David
2005 Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160047. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica 2019(228). 193–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene & Gina Joue
2017 Source actions ground metaphor via metonymy: Toward a frame-based account of gestural action in multimodal discourse. In Beate Hampe (ed.), Metaphor, 119–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Cornelia
2017a Waking metaphors: Embodied cognition in multimodal discourse. In B. Hampe (ed.), Metaphor, 297–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2004 Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Truths, lies and figurative scenarios: Metaphors at the heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics 16(5). 641–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 National conceptualisations of the body politic: Cultural experience and political imagination. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parril, Fey & Stec Kashmiri
2018 Seeing first person changes gesture but saying first person does not. Gesture 17(1). 158–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael J.
1979 The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schröder, Urlike
2017 Multimodal metaphors as cognitive pivots for the construction of cultural otherness in talk. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(4). 493–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad
2017 Cultural linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Karen
2013 Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szwedek, Aleksander
2014 The nature of domains and the relationships between them in metaphorization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 342–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Complex image schemas. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium. 4(1). 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 Thematic roles in image schemas: A missing link between mind and language. Cognitive Semantics 8(1). 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Javier, Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas, Inés Olza & Daniel Alcaraz Carrión
2020 Gesturing in the wild: Evidence for a flexible mental timeline. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehling, Elisabeth
2009 Argument is Gesture War: Function, form and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 35( 2 ). 54–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Discourse management gestures. Gesture 16(2). 245–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Bodo, Marcus Perlman & Teenie Matlock
2013 Using space to talk and gesture about numbers: Evidence from the TV News Archive. Gesture 13(3). 377–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
2007 Intersubjectivity, mimetic schemas and the emergence of language. Intellectica. Revue de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive 46(2). 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Image schemas, mimetic schemas and children’s gestures. Cognitive Semiotics 7(1). 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar