Review In:
Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 30:2 (2023) ► pp.444–449
Book review
. Indirect Speech Acts Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. ISBN 9781108673112 (ebook) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108673112
Reviewed by
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish
1979 Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness, some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press. 
Clark, Herbert H.
1979 Responding to Indirect Speech Acts. Cognitive Psychology
11
(4). 430–477.
Francik, Ellen P. & Herbert H. Clark
1985 How to Make Requests that Overcome Obstacles to Compliance. Journal of Memory and Language
24
(5). 560–568.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
1983 Do People Always Process the Literal Meanings of Indirect Requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
9
(3). 524–533.
Giora, Rachel
2004 On the Graded Salience Hypothesis. Intercultural Pragmatics
1
(1). 113–123.
Morgan, James L.
1978 Two Types of Convention in Speech Acts. In Petr Cole (ed.), Pragmatics.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda Thornburg
1998 A Cognitive Approach to Inferencing in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics
30
(6). 755–769.
Pérez Hernández, Lorena
2013 Illocutionary Constructions: (Multiple Source)-in-Target Metonymies, Illocutionary ICMs, and Specification Links. Language & Communication
33
(2). 128–149.
Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak & James J. Lee
2008 The Logic of Indirect Speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
105
(3). 833–838.
Searle, John
1979 Expression and meaning: studies in the theories of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1996 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell Publishing.