Review published In:
Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 30:2 (2023) ► pp.444–449
Book review
. Indirect Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. ISBN 9781108673112 (ebook) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108673112
Reviewed by
References (12)
Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness, some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press. 
Clark, Herbert H. 1979. Responding to Indirect Speech Acts. Cognitive Psychology
11
(4). 430–477.
Francik, Ellen P. & Herbert H. Clark. 1985. How to Make Requests that Overcome Obstacles to Compliance. Journal of Memory and Language
24
(5). 560–568.
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1983. Do People Always Process the Literal Meanings of Indirect Requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
9
(3). 524–533.
Giora, Rachel. 2004. On the Graded Salience Hypothesis. Intercultural Pragmatics
1
(1). 113–123.
Morgan, James L. 1978. Two Types of Convention in Speech Acts. In Petr Cole (ed.), Pragmatics.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda Thornburg. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Inferencing in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics
30
(6). 755–769.
Pérez Hernández, Lorena. 2013. Illocutionary Constructions: (Multiple Source)-in-Target Metonymies, Illocutionary ICMs, and Specification Links. Language & Communication
33
(2). 128–149.
Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak & James J. Lee. 2008. The Logic of Indirect Speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
105
(3). 833–838.
Searle, John. 1979. Expression and meaning: studies in the theories of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1996. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell Publishing.