Introduction In:
The Speech Act(ion) of Commenting in Social Media and Beyond
Edited by Robert Külpmann and Rita Finkbeiner
[Pragmatics & Cognition 31:2] 2024
► pp. 287293
References (18)
References
Austin, John L. 1975. How to do things with words (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finnegan (eds.). 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Educational.Google Scholar
Breindl, Eva & Jonas Schreiber. 2021. Metakommunikative Konnektoren als Konstruktionsfamilie. In Anne-Françoise Ehrhard-Macris & Gilbert Magnus (eds.), Text und Kommentieren im Deutschen, 49–67. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Antia & Elda Weizman. 2015. Following up across contexts and discourse domains: Introduction. In Elda Weizman & Anita Fetzer (eds.), Follow-ups in political discourse: Explorations across contexts and discourse domain, ix–xx. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 3–28. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Casey Rebecca. 2023. Some varieties of illocutionary pluralism. In Laura Caponetto & Paolo Labinaz (eds.), Sbisà on speech as action, 121–141. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larrory-Wunder, Anne. 2021. Zur kommentativen Funktion von Ausrufesätzen. In Anne-Françoise Ehrhard-Macris & Gilbert Magnus (eds.), Text und Kommentieren im Deutschen, 179–193. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2017. Speech acts. In Yan Huang (ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics, 199–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin. 2021. Illocutionary pluralism. Synthese 1991. 6687–6714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petkova-Kessanlis, Mikaela. 2021. Zur Realisierung des Handlungsmusters fachliches KOMMENTIEREN. In Anne-Françoise Ehrhard-Macris & Gilbert Magnus (eds.), Text und Kommentieren im Deutschen, 211–239. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Posner, Roland. 1972. Theorie des Kommentierens: eine Grundlagenstudie zur Semantik und Pragmatik. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina & Ken Turner. 2013. Introduction. In Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 1–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. 2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2013. Some remarks about speech act pluralism. In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy, 227–243. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider-Mizony, Odile. 2021. Kommentar als Anschlusskommunikation, Informationserweiterung, oder didaktische Intention? In Anne-Françoise Ehrhard-Macris & Gilbert Magnus (eds.), Text und Kommentieren im Deutschen, 17–30. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar