The role of gestures in communication is still debated: Some claim that gestures are merely ancillary forms of expressions, whereas others suggest a central role of gestures in the development of language. In this article, I provide data in support of the overarching hypothesis that gestures have a transitional function between ergotic/epistemic movements of hands and symbolic expressions. The context for the study of these transitions is constituted by school science laboratory activities conducted by students who are also asked to describe and explain while still within proximity of the materials of their investigations. It is hypothesized that communication is distributed across the context (verbal, gestural, material) and shifts increasingly into a verbal modality as students become familiar with the phenomena they are to learn about. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that initial temporal delays between gestures and the corresponding words decrease and finally disappear so that gestural and verbal modalities coincide. It is suggested that engaging in communication in the presence of material has an important cognitive function in that it affords a distribution of cognition across different modalities until individuals have developed the competence to express themselves effectively in the verbal modality.
2024. Speech and Gesture Complementarity in a Preschooler’s Conceptualization of Mechanical Equilibrium. Education Sciences 14:4 ► pp. 338 ff.
Gerner, Alexander Matthias, Thiemo Breyer, Niklas Grouls & Johannes F. M. Schick
2024. Diachronic Perspectives on Embodiment and Technology: Gestures and Artefacts – An Introduction. In Diachronic Perspectives on Embodiment and Technology [Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, 46], ► pp. 1 ff.
Zhang, Zhenzhen, Bingjun Yang & Wendy L. Bowcher
2024. Ways of questioning, ways of gesturing: how teachers elicit different ways of students’ thinking in elementary science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education► pp. 1 ff.
Ayık, Zekai
2023. Deployment of gestures in the semiotic construction of scientific knowledge: a systemic functional approach to pedagogic semiosis. Semiotica 2023:252 ► pp. 133 ff.
Bentley, Brendan, Kylie Walters & Gregory C. R. Yates
2023. Using iconic hand gestures in teaching a year 8 science lesson. Applied Cognitive Psychology 37:3 ► pp. 496 ff.
Ferreira, Juliene Madureira
2021. What If We Look at the Body? An Embodied Perspective of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review 33:4 ► pp. 1455 ff.
Tian, Lixian & Steven G. McCafferty
2021. Chinese international students’ multicultural identity and second language development: gesture awareness and use. Language Awareness 30:2 ► pp. 114 ff.
Gerner, Alexander Matthias
2020. Hacking into Cybertherapy: Considering a Gesture-enhanced Therapy with Avatars (g+TA). Kairos. Journal of Philosophy & Science 23:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Papandreou, Maria & Stefanos Yiallouros
2020. Highlighting the features of whole-class interactions in a participatory early childhood environment. Early Child Development and Care 190:4 ► pp. 461 ff.
Pantidos, Panagiotis
2017. Narrating Science in the Classroom: The Role of Semiotic Resources in Evoking Imaginative Thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education 28:4 ► pp. 388 ff.
2017. Reanalysing children’s responses on shadow formation: a comparative approach to bodily expressions and verbal discourse. International Journal of Science Education 39:18 ► pp. 2508 ff.
2016. The Contribution of the Human Body in Young Children’s Explanations About Shadow Formation. Research in Science Education 46:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Tenenberg, Josh, Wolff-Michael Roth & David Socha
2016. From I-Awareness to We-Awareness in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 25:4-5 ► pp. 235 ff.
Blanc, Nathalie & Peter Griggs
2015. Tracer la procéduralisation dans le contexte interactionnel et multimodal d’une classe d’immersion. Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures 12:3
JORNET, ALFREDO & WOLFF‐MICHAEL ROTH
2015. The Joint Work of Connecting Multiple (Re)presentations in Science Classrooms. Science Education 99:2 ► pp. 378 ff.
Cuadrado, Isabel & Inmaculada Fernández
2008. ¿Cómo intervienen maestros y profesores para favorecer el aprendizaje en Secundaria? Un estudio comparativo desde el análisis del discurso. Infancia y Aprendizaje 31:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Kastens, Kim A., Lynn S. Liben & Shruti Agrawal
2008. Epistemic Actions in Science Education. In Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5248], ► pp. 202 ff.
McCafferty, Steven G.
2008. MIMESIS AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: A Sociocultural Perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30:02
Pozzer‐Ardenghi, Lilian & Wolff‐Michael Roth
2007. On performing concepts during science lectures. Science Education 91:1 ► pp. 96 ff.
Givry, Damien & Wolff-Michael Roth
2006. Toward a new conception of conceptions: Interplay of talk, gestures, and structures in the setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43:10 ► pp. 1086 ff.
Roth, Wolff-Michael & Daniel V. Lawless
2002. How Does the Body Get Into the Mind?. Human Studies 25:3 ► pp. 333 ff.
Roth, Wolff-Michael
2001. Modeling design as situated and distributed process. Learning and Instruction 11:3 ► pp. 211 ff.
Roth, Wolff-Michael
2004. Perceptual gestalts in workplace communication. Journal of Pragmatics 36:6 ► pp. 1037 ff.
Roth, Wolff-Michael
2013. Contradictions and uncertainty in scientists’ mathematical modeling and interpretation of data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 32:3 ► pp. 593 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.