The positions of Brandom and Millikan are compared with respect to their common origins in the works of Wilfrid Sellars and Wittgenstein. Millikan takes more seriously the “picturing” themes from Sellars and Wittgenstein. Brandom follows Sellars more closely in deriving the normativity of language from social practice, although there are also hints of a possible derivation from evolutionary theory in Sellars. An important claim common to Brandom and Millikan is that there are no representations without function or “attitude”.
2024. Sellars, Analyticity, and a Dynamic Picture of Language. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14:1 ► pp. 78 ff.
Christias, Dionysis
2023. Prelude: Sellars’ Project and Its Essential Tension. In Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision, ► pp. 15 ff.
Nurkic, Petar & Ivan Umeljic
2022. What does a bee know? A teleosemantic framework for cognitive ethologist. Theoria, Beograd 65:4 ► pp. 33 ff.
Levine, Steven
2016. Sellars and Nonconceptual Content. European Journal of Philosophy 24:4 ► pp. 855 ff.
Johnson, Casey Rebecca
2015. Testimony and the Constitutive Norm of Assertion. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23:3 ► pp. 356 ff.
Parsell, Mitch
2011. Sellars on thoughts and beliefs. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10:2 ► pp. 261 ff.
Peregrin, Jaroslav
2010. The Enigma of Rules. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18:3 ► pp. 377 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In Millikan and Her Critics, ► pp. 282 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.