The paper has two related aims. One is to outline a proposal for a spatially motivated model of discourse, called Discourse Space Theory. The other is to use this framework to explore, in a relatively formalised way, the spatial basis of the conceptual complexities arising in the uses of the English progressive verb form (be+-ing). The theory utilises an abstract space in three dimensions (time, space and modality). Verb stems are associated with Aktionsart schemas; aspectual forms like the progressive are viewed as operations on these schemas. The proposal is that geometric concepts, specifically coordinate systems and vectors, can provide a motivated formalism for investigating conceptual structures generated by a human discourse processor.
2024. Event structure, force dynamics and verb semantics. Language Sciences 102 ► pp. 101610 ff.
Ledegen, Gudrun & Albin Wagener
2020. « Nous ne doutons pas de votre souffrance » : analyse pragmatique et sociolinguistique du nous de distanciation dans un chat de prévention du suicide. Corpus :21
Wagener, Albin
2017. Lauren Mayberry vs. 4chan’s online misogyny: A Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13:2
Cristina, Grisot
2016. Kasia M. Jaszczolt and Louis de Saussure: Time: Language, cognition and reality. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:1
Hart, Christopher
2015. VIEWPOINT IN LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE. Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 238 ff.
Wieczorek, Anna E
2015. ‘Look who’s talking now’: A taxonomy of speakers in single-turn political discourse. Discourse Studies 17:3 ► pp. 343 ff.
Conoscenti, Michelangelo
2013. Sprinkled Metonymies in the Analysis of Political Discourse with Corpus Linguistics Techniques: A Case Study. In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688], ► pp. 258 ff.
Ki-Sun Hong
2013. 영어와 한국어의 진행상. Korean Journal of Linguistics 38:4 ► pp. 1049 ff.
Saussure, Louis de
2011. 3 On Some Methodological Issues in the Conceptual/Procedural Distinction. In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives [Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, 25], ► pp. 55 ff.
Chilton, Paul
2010. The conceptual structure of deontic meaning: A model based on geometrical principles. Language and Cognition 2:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.