Article published In:
Learning Technologies and Cognition
Edited by Itiel E. Dror
[Pragmatics & Cognition 16:2] 2008
► pp. 224271
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Ahmadi Safa, Mohammad & Fateme Motaghi
2024. Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research 28:3  pp. 987 ff. DOI logo
van der Graaf, Joep, Mladen Raković, Yizhou Fan, Lyn Lim, Shaveen Singh, Maria Bannert, Dragan Gašević & Inge Molenaar
2023. How to design and evaluate personalized scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning 18:3  pp. 783 ff. DOI logo
Hovardas, Tasos, Zacharias Zacharia, Nikoletta Xenofontos & Ton de Jong
2022. How many words are enough? Investigating the effect of different configurations of a software scaffold for formulating scientific hypotheses in inquiry-oriented contexts. Instructional Science 50:3  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Matteson, Shirley Marie
2021. Strategies for Lessening the Cognitive Load of Graduate Students Engaged in Major Writing Projects. In Handbook of Research on Developing Students’ Scholarly Dispositions in Higher Education [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ],  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Schumacher, Clara & Dirk Ifenthaler
2021. Investigating prompts for supporting students' self-regulation – A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches?. The Internet and Higher Education 49  pp. 100791 ff. DOI logo
Supianto, Ahmad Afif, Yusuke Hayashi & Tsukasa Hirashima
2017. 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech),  pp. 546 ff. DOI logo
Beng Lee, Chwee, Keck Voon Ling, Peter Reimann, Yudho Ahmad Diponegoro, Chia Heng Koh & Derwin Chew
2014. Dynamic scaffolding in a cloud-based problem representation system. Campus-Wide Information Systems 31:5  pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Chwee Beng, Paul Rooney & Roberto H Parada
2014. Fostering intentional learning with systems dynamic modeling. Australian Journal of Education 58:1  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge & Ming Ming Chiu
2014. Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition: statistical discourse analysis of primary school children’s collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning 9:2  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge & Ming Ming Chiu
2015. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge,  pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge, Peter Sleegers & Carla van Boxtel
2014. Metacognitive scaffolding during collaborative learning: a promising combination. Metacognition and Learning 9:3  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Hung, I-Chun, Chun-Wang Wei & Nian-Shing Chen
2013. 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies,  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge, Carla van Boxtel & Peter Sleegers
2013. Dynamic Computerized Scaffolding of Metacognitive Activities in Small Groups. In International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies [Springer International Handbooks of Education, 28],  pp. 561 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge, Claudia Roda, Carla van Boxtel & Peter Sleegers
2012. Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education 59:2  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge, Ming Ming Chiu, Peter Sleegers & Carla van Boxtel
2011. Scaffolding of small groups’ metacognitive activities with an avatar. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6:4  pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge, Carla van Boxtel, Peter Sleegers & Claudia Roda
2011. Attention management for self-regulated learning: AtGentSchool. In Human Attention in Digital Environments,  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge, Carla A. M. van Boxtel & Peter J. C. Sleegers
2011. Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement. Instructional Science 39:6  pp. 785 ff. DOI logo
Molenaar, Inge, Carla A.M. van Boxtel & Peter J.C. Sleegers
2010. The effects of scaffolding metacognitive activities in small groups. Computers in Human Behavior 26:6  pp. 1727 ff. DOI logo
Roda, Claudia
2011. Human attention and its implications for human–computer interaction. In Human Attention in Digital Environments,  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.