Design experiences can provide valuable opportunities for learners to improve their understanding of both science content and scientific practices. However, the implementation of design-based science learning (DBSL) in classrooms presents a number of significant challenges. In this article we present two significant challenges, bridging the design-science gap and overcoming time and material constraints, and a strategy for addressing them through software design in which explanation-construction scaffolding integrates with modeling and simulation. We present two software systems (SIMCARS and SHADE) developed based on our strategy and guidelines for integrating them into DBSL practices. We present a pilot study (involving SIMCARS), the findings of which support the potential of our technology for responding to the identified challenges. A follow up study (involving SHADE) is presented which shows the affordances of our technology for improving the quality of classroom discourse, suggesting the potential of our strategy to enhance collaborative understanding and social construction of knowledge in DBSL environments.
2023. Teachers as makers: How K-12 teachers design 3D making lessons for classroom teaching. Education and Information Technologies 28:6 ► pp. 6947 ff.
Jiang, Yang, Debra Brockway & Jung Aa Moon
2023. Incorporating an engineering context into science learning: The effects of task context and response structuring on science understanding and investigation behaviors in a simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60:6 ► pp. 1292 ff.
2022. Facilitating educationally disadvantaged students' learning of torque using a design-based activity. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education 10:1
Chase, Catherine C., Laura Malkiewich & Aakash S. Kumar
2019. Learning to notice science concepts in engineering activities and transfer situations. Science Education 103:2 ► pp. 440 ff.
Chase, Catherine C., Jenna Marks, Laura J. Malkiewich & Helena Connolly
2019. How teacher talk guidance during Invention activities shapes students’ cognitive engagement and transfer. International Journal of STEM Education 6:1
Malkiewich, Laura J. & Catherine C. Chase
2019. Focusing processes: potential pathways for transfer of science concepts from an engineering task. International Journal of Science Education 41:11 ► pp. 1475 ff.
Malkiewich, Laura J. & Catherine C. Chase
2019. What’s your goal? The importance of shaping the goals of engineering tasks to focus learners on the underlying science. Instructional Science 47:5 ► pp. 551 ff.
2018. Learning and teaching engineering design through modeling and simulation on a CAD platform. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 26:4 ► pp. 824 ff.
Adams, Robin S., Molly Goldstein, Şenay Purzer, Jie Chao, Charles Xie & Saeid Nourian
2017. Traversing the Barriers to Using Big Data in Understating How High School Students Design. In Design Computing and Cognition '16, ► pp. 613 ff.
Chao, Jie, Charles Xie, Saeid Nourian, Guanhua Chen, Siobhan Bailey, Molly H. Goldstein, Senay Purzer, Robin S. Adams & M. Shane Tutwiler
2017. Bridging the design‐science gap with tools: Science learning and design behaviors in a simulated environment for engineering design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54:8 ► pp. 1049 ff.
Purzer, Şenay, Molly Hathaway Goldstein, Robin S Adams, Charles Xie & Saeid Nourian
2015. An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education 2:1
Vaino, Toomas, Katrin Vaino, Miia Rannikmäe & Jack Holbrook
2015. FACTORS EXPLAINING GYMNASIUM STUDENTS’ TECHNOLOGY RELATED CAREER ORIENTATIONS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 14:6 ► pp. 706 ff.
Apedoe, Xornam S. & Christian D. Schunn
2013. Strategies for success: uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning. Instructional Science 41:4 ► pp. 773 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.