Article published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 17:1 (2009) ► pp. 142
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Castro, Leyre, Edward A. Wasserman, Joël Fagot & Anaïs Maugard
2015. Object-specific and relational learning in pigeons. Animal Cognition 18:1  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Zhongzhou & Gary Gladding
2014. How to make a good animation: A grounded cognition model of how visual representation design affects the construction of abstract physics knowledge. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 10:1 Crossref logo
Ching, Boby Ho-Hong & Xiaohan Wu
2019. Concreteness fading fosters children's understanding of the inversion concept in addition and subtraction. Learning and Instruction 61  pp. 148 ff. Crossref logo
Goldstone, Robert L., David H. Landy & Ji Y. Son
2010. The Education of Perception. Topics in Cognitive Science 2:2  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo
Kaminski, Jennifer A. & Vladimir M. Sloutsky
2020. The use and effectiveness of colorful, contextualized, student-made material for elementary mathematics instruction. International Journal of STEM Education 7:1 Crossref logo
Liu, Allison S. & Christian D. Schunn
2017. Applying math onto mechanisms: mechanistic knowledge is associated with the use of formal mathematical strategies. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2:1 Crossref logo
Menendez, David, Karl S. Rosengren & Martha W. Alibali
2020. Do details bug you? Effects of perceptual richness in learning about biological change. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34:5  pp. 1101 ff. Crossref logo
Menendez, David, Karl S. Rosengren & Martha W. Alibali
2022. Detailed bugs or bugging details? The influence of perceptual richness across elementary school years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 213  pp. 105269 ff. Crossref logo
Nathan, Mitchell J.
2012. Rethinking Formalisms in Formal Education. Educational Psychologist 47:2  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Pavlik, Philip I., Michael Yudelson & Kenneth R. Koedinger
2015. A Measurement Model of Microgenetic Transfer for Improving Instructional Outcomes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 25:3  pp. 346 ff. Crossref logo
Rahaman, Jeenath, Harshit Agrawal, Nisheeth Srivastava & Sanjay Chandrasekharan
2018. Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces. Cognitive Science 42:2  pp. 370 ff. Crossref logo
Tapola, Anna, Tomi Jaakkola & Markku Niemivirta
2014. The Influence of Achievement Goal Orientations and Task Concreteness on Situational Interest. The Journal of Experimental Education 82:4  pp. 455 ff. Crossref logo
Tapola, Anna, Marjaana Veermans & Markku Niemivirta
2013. Predictors and outcomes of situational interest during a science learning task. Instructional Science 41:6  pp. 1047 ff. Crossref logo
Yeaman, Adetoun O., Karis Boyd-Sinkler & Diana Bairaktarova
2017.  In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE),  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.