Cover not available
Review published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 18:1 (2010) ► pp.203–210
Book review

Carla Bazzanella (ed.). Paradigmi, Rivista di critica filosofica 17. La Forza cognitiva della metafora Special Issue of. (1). 208 pp. . ISSN 1120-3404

Reviewed by
| Unversity of Genoa
Published online: 9 April 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18.1.12pra
References (25)
References
Aristotle. 1926. The Art of Rhetoric. Translated into English by J. H. Freese. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: William Heineman – Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1973. Poetics. Translated into English by W. Hamilton Fyfe. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: William Heineman – Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, M. 1954. “Metaphor”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 551: 273–294 [Reprinted in Black, M. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 25–47].Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. 1960. Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie. Bonn: Bouvier und Co.Google Scholar
Conte, M. -E. 1988. Condizioni di coerenza. Florence: La Nuova Italia [New edition by M. B. Garavelli, Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso].Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1957. Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontanier, P. 1968. Les figures du discours. Paris: Flammarion. Contains: Manuel classique pour l’étude des tropes (1821. 4th edition, 1830) and Traité général des figures de discours autres que les tropes (1827).Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. and Tendahl, M. 2006. “Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics”. Mind & Language 21(3): 379–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, G. 1999. “La notion d’emploi dans le traitement automatique”. La pensée et la langue, Wydawnictwo Naukowe 11: 24–35.Google Scholar
Kahnemann, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”. Econometrica 471: 263–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea: Green Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Lakoff, J. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Kövecses, Z. 1987: “The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English”. In D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds), Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prandi, M. 2004. “Conceptual conflict and metaphor”. In S. Arduini (ed), Metaphors. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 81–117.Google Scholar
2005. “From conceptual conflict towards analogy”. In A. Baicchi, C. Broccias, and A. Sansò (eds), Modeling Thought and Constructing Meaning. Cognitive Models in Interaction. Milan: Franco Angeli, 185–197.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1975. La métaphore vive. Paris: Editions du Seuil [English trans 1978. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press].Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vailati, G. 1972. Scritti filosofici. Naples: Fulvio Rossi.Google Scholar
2000. Il metodo della filosofia. Saggi di critica del linguaggio. Bari: Graphis.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H. 1958. “Münze und Wort. Untersuchungen an einem Bildfeld”. In Romanica. Festschrift Rohlfs. Halle: Niemeyer, 508–521.Google Scholar
1964. “Typen der Gedächtnismetaphorik”. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 91: 23–26.Google Scholar
Welby, V. 1985. Significs and Language, and other Essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Carston, R. 2006. “Metaphor, relevance, and the ‘emergent property issue’”. Mind & Language 21(3): 404–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Windelband, W. 1894. “Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft”. In Das Stiftungsfest der Kaiser-Wil-helms-Universität. Strasbourg: Universitätsbuchdruckerei Heitz & Mündel [Reprinted in Windelband, W. 1915. Präludien. Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, Vol. 21. Tübingen: Mohr, 136–160].Google Scholar