Cognitive constraints in English lexical
blending
A data collection methodology and an explanatory model
The complex characteristics of lexical blending have long
troubled mainstream word formation research to the extent that it has typically
been considered a peripheral issue in linguistics. In recent years this has
begun to change, and there is currently a growing body of evidence uncovering
the intriguing nature of this word formation process. In the present study,
underlying principles and usage-based aspects of lexical blends were examined.
Analyses of derivatives of three matrix words, republican,
liberal, and vegetarian, revealed the impact of
three cognitive constraints on the use of lexical blends: schema transfer
effects, neighborhood effects, and effects of the influence from morphological
lexicalization. The first constraint fueled blend formation, while the other two
displayed a hampering effect on the use of lexical blending. Furthermore, a
study of the word class distribution in the datasets showed that there were
significant differences in the grammar of lexical blending and compounding,
respectively.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous research
- 3.Method
- 3.1Terminology
- 3.2Methodological concerns
- 3.3Data collection procedure
- 4.Data and results
- 4.1Study 1: Structural analysis of blend formations
- 4.1.1Republican
- 4.1.2Liberal
- 4.1.3Vegetarian
- 4.1.4Summary of the structural analyses
- 4.2Study 2: Word class distribution
- 4.2.1Republican
- 4.2.2Liberal
- 4.2.3Vegetarian
- 4.2.4Summary of the analyses of word class distribution
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Schema transfer effects
- 5.2Neighborhood effects
- 5.3Morphological lexicalization
- 5.4Implications of word class distribution
- 5.5Summary of discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Algeo, John
1977 Blends, a structural and systemic view.
American Speech 52(1). 47–64.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alm-Arvius, Christina
2012 Comprehensive semantics: Lexicon, grammar, text cognition &
the world. Stockholm University: Unpublished manuscript.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barber, Charles, Joan C. Beal & Philip A. Shaw
2009 The English language: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie
1983 English word-formation. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie
2006 Compounds and minor word-formation types. In
Bas Aarts &
April M. S. MacMahon (eds.),
The handbook of English Linguistics, 483–506. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beliaeva, Natalia
2014 A study of English blends: From structure to meaning and back
again.
Word Structure 7(1). 29–54.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergström, Gustaf Adolf
1906 On blendings of synonymous or cognate expressions in English: A
contribution to the study of contamination. Lund University (Press) / Lund: H. Ohlsson.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cannon, Garland
1986 Blends in English word formation.
Linguistics 24(4). 723–753.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cook, Paul
2012 Using social media to find English lexical blends. In
Ruth Vatvedt Fjeld &
Julie Matilde Torjusen (eds.),
Proceedings of the 15th EURALEX International Congress, 846–854. Oslo: Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cook, Paul & Suzanne Stevenson
2010 Automatically identifying the source words of lexical blends in
English.
Computational Linguistics 36(1). 129–149.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, David
2001 Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, David
2011 Internet linguistics: A student guide. New York: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2000 Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In
Ursula Doleschal &
Anna M. Thornton (eds.),
Extragrammatical and marginal morphology, 1–10. Munich: Lincom Europa.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fandrych, Ingrid
2008 Pagad, Chillax and Jozi: A multi-level approach to acronyms,
blends, and clippings.
Nawa: Journal of Language & Communication 2(2). 71–88.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
2002 The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden
complexities. New York: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fradin, Bernard
2015 Blending. In
Peter O. Müller,
Ingeborg Ohnheiser,
Susan Olsen &
Franz Rainer (eds.),
Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of
Europe, 386–413. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, Stefan Th
2004a Isn’t that fantabulous? How similarity motivates
intentional morphological blends in English. In
Michael Achard &
Suzanne Kemmer (eds.),
Language, culture, and mind, 415–428. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, Stefan Th
2004b Shouldn’t it be breakfunch? A quantitative
analysis of blend structure in English.
Linguistics 42(3). 639–667.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, Stefan Th
2006 Cognitive determinants of subtractive word formation: A
corpus-based perspective.
Cognitive Linguistics 17(4). 535–558.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, Stefan Th
2012 Quantitative corpus data on blend formation: Psycho- and
cognitive-linguistic perspectives. In
Vincent Renner,
Pierre Arnaud,
Volker Gast &
François Maniez (eds.),
Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending, 145–167. Berlin: de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Trevor A.
2008 The psychology of language: From data to theory. New York: Psychology Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, Jennifer
2001 Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything
relative? Linguistics 391. 1041–1070.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Mark
1987 The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and
reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juhasz, Barbara J., Rebecca L. Johnson & Jennifer Brewer
2016 An investigation into the processing of lexicalized English blend
words: Evidence from lexical decisions and eye movements during
reading.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46(2): 1–14.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelly, Michael
1998 To “brunch” or to “brench”: Some aspects of blend
structure.
Linguistics 36(3). 579–590.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kemmer, Suzanne
2003 Schemas and lexical blends. In
Hubert Cuyckens,
Thomas Berg &
René Dirven (eds.),
Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science:
Motivation in language. Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 69–97. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008 Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehrer, Adrienne
1996 Identifying and interpreting blends: An experimental
approach.
Cognitive Linguistics 7(4). 359–390.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehrer, Adrienne
1998 Scapes, holics, and thons: The semantics of English combining
forms.
American Speech 73(1). 3–28.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehrer, Adrienne
2007 Blendalicious. In
Judith Munat (ed.),
Lexical creativity, texts and contexts, 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libben, Gary, Martha Gibson, Yeo Bom Yoon & Dominiek Sandra
2003 Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and
morphological headedness.
Brain and Language 84(1). 50–64.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López Rúa, Paula
2004 The categorial continuum of English blends.
English Studies 851. 63–76.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plag, Ingo
2003 Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pound, Louise
1914 Blends: Their relation to English word formation. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Jan Svartvik, Geoffrey Leech & Sidney Greenbaum
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Renner, Vincent, François Maniez & Pierre Arnaud
(eds.) 2012 Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke
2006 Lexical blends: Functionally tuning the transparency of complex
words.
Folia Linguistica 40(1–2). 155–181.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandra, Dominiek
1990 On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic
access to constituent morphemes does not occur.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 42(3). 529–567.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1966 Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sereno, Joan A. & Allard Jongman
1997 Processing of English inflectional morphology.
Memory & Cognition 25(4). 425–437.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soudek, Lev
1968 Further members of the “burger” family.
American Speech 431. 74–76.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soudek, Lev
1971 The development and use of the morpheme burger
in American English.
Linguistics 91. 61–89.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spencer, Andrew
1996 Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, John R.
2002 Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
2003 Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language
acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warren, Beatrice
1990 The importance of combining forms. In
Wolfgang Dressler,
Hans C. Luschutzky,
Oskar E. Pfeiffer &
John R. Rennison (eds.),
Contemporary morphology, 111–132. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wentworth, Harold
1933 Twenty-nine synonyms for ‘portmanteau word’.
American Speech 8(4). 78–79.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Withington, Robert
1932 More “portmanteau” coinages.
American Speech 7(3). 200–203.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Balteiro, Isabel & Laurie Bauer
2018.
List of references.
Lexis :14
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Karpova, Kateryna & Tetyana Chaiuk
2020.
Vocabulary enrichment of modern English via world-formation (on the material of the language of COVID-19 pandemic).
Actual issues of Ukrainian linguistics theory and practice :41
► pp. 155 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kjellander, Daniel
2018.
Gold Punning: studying multistable meaning structures using a systematically collected set of lexical blends.
Lexis :14
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.