Beyond triadic communication
A three-dimensional conceptual space for modelling intersubjectivity
Coordinating different viewpoints is an essential part of human interaction. Languages have evolved conventional ways of supporting this process: many linguistic items are somehow involved in viewpoint management, ranging from morphological elements and lexical units to grammatical constructions and narrative patterns. In this paper we propose a conceptual model for analysing how particular instances (or combinations) of such linguistic items can be used to coordinate the viewpoints of signallers, addressees, and third parties involved in an interaction event. In essence, our model augments Langacker’s (1987) “viewing arrangement” through the addition of a third dimension to the existing two. We discuss the details of our model using a range of examples from spoken discourse, newspaper articles, and literary fiction, and end by placing it in broader discussions on human social cognition.
Article outline
- 1.Viewpoint management and intersubjectivity
- 2.A three-dimensional conceptual space
- 2.1Dyadic and triadic communication
- 2.2Speaker commitment and viewpoint embedding: Dalabon and English
- 2.3The general model
- 3.Thoughtscapes and the 3D-model: Three case studies
- 3.1Case 1: Murder or accident?
- 3.2Case 2: Scope and framing in adjectives
- 3.3Case 3: Perspective mixing: Free Indirect Discourse, and other forms
- 4.Conclusion and discussion
- 4.1Summary
- 4.2The broader context: Intersubjective language and intersubjective thought
- Notes
-
References
References
Apperly, Ian
2011 Mindreaders: The cognitive basis for theory of mind. New York: Psychology Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 The dialogic imagination. Edited by
Michael Holquist, translated by
Caryl Emerson and
Michael Holquist. Austin/London: Texas University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bal, Mieke
1985 Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckmann
1966 The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dancygier, Barbara
2012 The language of stories: A cognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen
(eds.) 2016 Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. (
Cognitive Linguistics Research [CLR] 55). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dennett, Daniel C.
1987 The intentional stance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W.
2003 Discourse and grammar. In
Michael Tomasello (ed.),
The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 21. 47–87. London: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W.
2007 The stance triangle. In
Robert Englebretson (ed.),
Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duijn, Max J. van
2016 The lazy mindreader: A humanities perspective on mindreading and multiple-order intentionality. PhD Thesis, Leiden University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duijn, Max J. van
2018 Readers’ mindreading challenges, and how they can inform cognitive science.
Review of General Psychology 22(2). 188–198.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duijn, Max J. van, & Arie Verhagen
Evans, Nicholas
2010 Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994 Mental Spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fludernik, Monika
1993 The fiction of language and the languages of fiction. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Genette, Gérard
1980 Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heyes, Cecilia
2018 Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hühn, Peter, Wolf Schmid & Jörg Schönert
(eds.) 2009 Point of view, perspective, and focalization: Modeling mediation in narrative. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchinson, Tom
1988 Speech presentations in fiction with reference to The Tiger Moth by H. E. Bates. In
Michael H. Short (ed.),
Reading, analysing and teaching literature, 120–145. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
2014 Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In
Laura Visapää,
Jyrki Kalliokoski,
Helena Sorva (eds.).
Contexts of subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives
, 17–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short
2007 [1981] Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McElreath, Richard & Joseph Henrich
2007 Dual inheritance theory: The evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In
Robin Dunbar &
Louise Barrett (eds.),
Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B.
1997 Semiotic grammar. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milligan, Karen, Janet Wilde Astington & Lisa Ain Dack
2007 Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding.
Child Development 78(2). 622–646.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2010 Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past+now
.
Language and Literature 19(3). 265–284.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Owings, Donald H. & Eugene S. Morton
1998 Animal vocal communication: A new approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sanders, Ted, José Sanders & Eve Sweetser
2009 Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In
Ted Sanders &
Eve Sweetser (eds.),
Causal categories in discourse and cognition, 19–59. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney & Peter Marler
1980 Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate.
Animal Behaviour 28(4). 1070–1094.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
2008 Origins of human communication. Boston: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
2014 A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2002 Prenominal adjectives in English: Structures and ordering.
Folia Linguistica XXXVI 3–4. 219–259.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2004 Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation.
Journal of Pragmatics 36(3). 489–520.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2009 Speech and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2012 “Wait till you got started”. How to submerge another’s discourse in your own. In
Barbara Dancygier &
Eve Sweetser (eds.),
Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 198–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verhagen, Arie
2000 “The girl that promised to become something”: An exploration into diachronic subjectification in Dutch. In
Thomas F. Shannon &
Johan P. Snapper (eds.).
The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1997: The Dutch Language at the Millennium, 197–208. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verhagen, Arie
2005 Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verhagen, Arie
2008a Intersubjectivity and explanation in linguistics – A reply to Hinzen and Van Lambalgen.
Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 125–143.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wellman, Henry M.
2014 Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westh, Cecil
1980 H. E. Bates: The song of the wren, the dam, the tiger moth, Oh! Sweeter than the berry. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilkins, David
1986 Particle/clitics for criticism and complaint in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda).
Journal of Pragmatics 10(5). 575–596.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Verhagen, Arie
2023.
The origins of perspective taking lie in iconic language use: Unifying theories of signs, conversation, and narrative perspective.
Frontiers in Communication 8
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.