Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 25:2 (2018) ► pp.384–416

Beyond triadic communication

A three-dimensional conceptual space for modelling intersubjectivity

| Leiden University, The Netherlands
| Leiden University, The Netherlands
Coordinating different viewpoints is an essential part of human interaction. Languages have evolved conventional ways of supporting this process: many linguistic items are somehow involved in viewpoint management, ranging from morphological elements and lexical units to grammatical constructions and narrative patterns. In this paper we propose a conceptual model for analysing how particular instances (or combinations) of such linguistic items can be used to coordinate the viewpoints of signallers, addressees, and third parties involved in an interaction event. In essence, our model augments Langacker’s (1987) “viewing arrangement” through the addition of a third dimension to the existing two. We discuss the details of our model using a range of examples from spoken discourse, newspaper articles, and literary fiction, and end by placing it in broader discussions on human social cognition.
Keywords: viewpoint, perspective, intersubjectivity, polyphony, viewpoint packages, framing adjectives, social cognition
Article outline
  • 1.Viewpoint management and intersubjectivity
  • 2.A three-dimensional conceptual space
    • 2.1Dyadic and triadic communication
    • 2.2Speaker commitment and viewpoint embedding: Dalabon and English
    • 2.3The general model
  • 3.Thoughtscapes and the 3D-model: Three case studies
    • 3.1Case 1: Murder or accident?
    • 3.2Case 2: Scope and framing in adjectives
    • 3.3Case 3: Perspective mixing: Free Indirect Discourse, and other forms
  • 4.Conclusion and discussion
    • 4.1Summary
    • 4.2The broader context: Intersubjective language and intersubjective thought
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18004.dui
References
Apperly, Ian
2011 Mindreaders: The cognitive basis for theory of mind. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 The dialogic imagination. Edited by Michael Holquist, translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin/London: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke
1985 Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckmann
1966 The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
2012 The language of stories: A cognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen
(eds.) 2016 Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. (Cognitive Linguistics Research [CLR] 55). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C.
1987 The intentional stance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1985 Competing motivations. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 343–365. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 21. 47–87. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2007 The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duijn, Max J. van
2016 The lazy mindreader: A humanities perspective on mindreading and multiple-order intentionality. PhD Thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
2018 Readers’ mindreading challenges, and how they can inform cognitive science. Review of General Psychology 22(2). 188–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duijn, Max J. van, & Arie Verhagen
2019 Recursive embedding of viewpoints, irregularity, and the role for a flexible framework. Pragmatics 29(2). 198–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2010 Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994 Mental Spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, Monika
1993 The fiction of language and the languages of fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard
1980 Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, Cecilia
2018 Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hühn, Peter, Wolf Schmid & Jörg Schönert
(eds.) 2009 Point of view, perspective, and focalization: Modeling mediation in narrative. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Tom
1988 Speech presentations in fiction with reference to The Tiger Moth by H. E. Bates. In Michael H. Short (ed.), Reading, analysing and teaching literature, 120–145. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski, Helena Sorva (eds.). Contexts of subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives , 17–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short
2007 [1981] Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
McElreath, Richard & Joseph Henrich
2007 Dual inheritance theory: The evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In Robin Dunbar & Louise Barrett (eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B.
1997 Semiotic grammar. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milligan, Karen, Janet Wilde Astington & Lisa Ain Dack
2007 Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development 78(2). 622–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2010 Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past+now . Language and Literature 19(3). 265–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owings, Donald H. & Eugene S. Morton
1998 Animal vocal communication: A new approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted, José Sanders & Eve Sweetser
2009 Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In Ted Sanders & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Causal categories in discourse and cognition, 19–59. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney & Peter Marler
1980 Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Animal Behaviour 28(4). 1070–1094. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008 Origins of human communication. Boston: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2002 Prenominal adjectives in English: Structures and ordering. Folia Linguistica XXXVI 3–4. 219–259.Google Scholar
2004 Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation. Journal of Pragmatics 36(3). 489–520.Google Scholar
2007  Mister so-called X: Discourse functions and subjectification of so-called . In Christopher S. Butler, Raquel Hidalgo Downing & Julia Lavid (eds.), Functional perspectives on grammar and discourse: In honour of Angela Downing, 359–394. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Speech and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Wait till you got started”. How to submerge another’s discourse in your own. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 198–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2000 “The girl that promised to become something”: An exploration into diachronic subjectification in Dutch. In Thomas F. Shannon & Johan P. Snapper (eds.). The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1997: The Dutch Language at the Millennium, 197–208. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2005 Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008a Intersubjectivity and explanation in linguistics – A reply to Hinzen and Van Lambalgen. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system. In Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, 307–331. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Henry M.
2014 Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westh, Cecil
1980 H. E. Bates: The song of the wren, the dam, the tiger moth, Oh! Sweeter than the berry. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David
1986 Particle/clitics for criticism and complaint in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda). Journal of Pragmatics 10(5). 575–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Verhagen, Arie
2023. The origins of perspective taking lie in iconic language use: Unifying theories of signs, conversation, and narrative perspective. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Zeman, Sonja
2019. The emergence of viewpoints in multiple perspective constructions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.