Article published In:
Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 25:2 (2018) ► pp.363–383
Inference from academic texts in children with autism
Children and adults with autism do worse on tests of inferences than controls. This fact has been attributed to poor language skills, a tendency to focus on detail, and poor social understanding. This study examines whether children with autism with age-appropriate language and cognitive skills have difficulties drawing inferences from academic, expository texts. Sixteen children with autism and a control group of twenty-four children were matched on language skills, nonverbal cognitive ability, and auditory and nonverbal working memory and compared on their responses to questions that require inferences. The children with autism scored significantly lower on inference questions than the controls. Although language skills explain much of the variance in inference scores, diagnostic background also made a contribution. The results are discussed in the light of theories of suppression of irrelevant information and recognition of text writers’ communicative intention.
Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorders, text comprehension, inference, attribution of mental states, weak central coherence, suppression of irrelevant information
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Method
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Materials
- 2.3Procedure
- 3.Results
- 4.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (50)
American Psychiatric Association APA. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing. 
Åsberg, Jakob. 2010. Patterns of language and discourse comprehension skills in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 51(6). 534–539.
Åsberg, Jakob, Svenny Kopp, Kristina Berg-Kelly & Christopher Gillberg. 2010. Reading comprehension, word decoding and spelling in girls with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD): Performance and predictors. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 45(1). 61–71.
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 1989. The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 30(2). 285–297.
Bishop, Dorothy. 2010. Test for Reception of Grammar, 2nd edn. Danish version developed by Kirstine Jensen de Lopez, Ane Knüppel & Lone Sundahl Olsen. Bromma, Sweden: Pearson Assessment.
. 2012. CCC-2: Children’s Communication Checklist, 2nd edn. Bromma, Sweden: Pearson Assessment.
Brock, Jon, Courtenay Norbury, Shiri Einav & Kate Nation. 2008. Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-movements. Cognition 1081. 896–904.
Brown, Heather M., Janis Oram-Cardy & Andrew Johnson. 2013. A meta-analysis of the reading comprehension skills of individuals with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43(4). 932–955.
Cain, Kate & Jane Oakhill. 1999. Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 111. 489–503.
Cain, Kate, Jane Oakhill & Peter E. Bryant. 2004. Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology 96(1). 31–42.
Chevallier, Coralie, Deidre Wilson, Francesca Happé & Ira Noveck. 2010. Scalar inferences in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 40(9). 1104–1117.
Christensen, Rikke V., Stine T. Jensen & Iben I. Nielsen. 2012. Sætningsgentagelsestesten [‘The sentence repetition test’]. Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Crumpler, Mary & Colin McCarty. 2004. Diagnostic Reading Analysis: Reading booklet. London, UK: Hodder Education.
Daugaard, Hanne Trebbien. 2015. Hvordan hænger det sammen? Om specifikke vanskeligheder med sprogforståelse i læsning og inferensfærdigheders betydning for læseforståelse [’How does it hang together? On specific difficulties with language comprehension in reading and the role of inference skills for reading comprehension’]. Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen PhD thesis.
Daugaard, Hanne Trebbien & Carsten Elbro. 2013. Inferensundervisning med grafiske modeller: En effektundersøgelse i specialundervisningen og på skolens 7. klassetrin [‘Inference teaching with graphic models: An effect study in special education and in grade 7’]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Center for Læseforskning og Undervisningsministeriet (Ministeriet for Børn og Undervisning).
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of Funtional Grammar – Part I: The structure of the clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dunn, Loyd M. & Douglas M. Dunn. 1981. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. Danish version: Bremer Nielsen, J. 2008. Det mentale leksikon og testning af receptivt ordforråd: Ændring af Peabody-testen [‘The mental lexicon and testing of receptive vocabulary: Changes to the Peabody test’]. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eberhardt, Melanie & Aparna Nadig. 2016. Reduced sensitivity to context in language comprehension: A characteristic of Autism Spectrum Disorders or of poor structural language ability? Research in Developmental Disabilities 721. 284–296.
Frith, Uta & Maggie Snowling. 1983. Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1(4). 329–342.
Gellert, Anna & Rikke Vang Christensen. 2012. Produktivt ordforråd [‘Productive vocabulary’]. Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & Mark E. Faust. 1991. The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17(2). 245–262.
Happé, Francesca. 1993. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition 481. 101–119.
. 1999. Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style? Trends in Cognitive Science 3(6). 216–222. PII: S1364-6613(99)01318-2.
Happé, Francesca & Uta Frith. 2006. The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36(1). 5–25.
Hogrefe, G.-Juergen, Heinz Wimmer & Josef Perner. 1986. Ignorance versus false belief: A developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development 57(3). 567–582.
Jolliffe, Therese & Simon Baron-Cohen. 1999. A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired? Cognition 711. 149–185.
. 2000. Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger’s syndrome: Is global coherence impaired? Psychological Medicine 30(5). 1169–1187.
Kintsch, Walter & Katherine A. Rawson. 2005. Chapter 12: Comprehension. In Margaret J. Snowling & Charles Humle (eds.), The science of reading: A handbook, 209–226. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lucas, Rebecca & Courtenay Frazier Norbury. 2014. Levels of text comprehension in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): The influence of language phenotype. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 44(11). 2756–2768.
. 2015. Making inferences from text: It’s vocabulary that matters. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 58(4). 1224–1232.
Minshew, Nancy J., John Sweeney & Beatriz Luna. 2002. Autism as a selective disorder of complex information processing and underdevelopment of neocortical systems. Molecular Psychiatry 71. S14–S15.
Nielsen, Ina & Dorthe Klint Petersen. 1993. Diavok: En diagnostisk læse- og stavetest [‘Diavok: A diagnostic reading and spelling test’]. Copenhagen, Denmark: AOF’s Landsforbund.
Norbury, Courtenay Frazier. 2005. Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 90(2). 142–171.
Norbury, Courtenay Frazier & Dorothy V. M. Bishop. 2002. Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: A comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high-functioning autism. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 37(3). 227–251.
Norbury, Courtenay & Kate Nation. 2011. Understanding variability in reading comprehension in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Interactions with language status and decoding skill. Scientific Studies of Reading 13(3). 191–210.
Ochs, Elinor, Tamar Kremer-Sadlik, Karen Gainer Sirota & Olga Solomon. 2004. Autism and the social world: An anthropological perspective. Discourse Studies 6(2). 147–183.
O’Connor, Irene M. & Perry D. Klein. 2004. Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34(2). 115–127.
Perfetti, Charles A. & Lesley Hart. 2001. The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In David S. Gorfien (ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity, 67–86. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pijnacker, Judith, Peter Hagoort, Jan Buitelaar, Jan-Pieter Teunisse & Bart Geurts. 2009. Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrom. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 39(4). 607–618.
Randi, Judy, Tina Newman & Elena L. Grigorenko. 2010. Teaching children with autism to read for meaning: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 40(7). 890–902.
Roux, Catherine, Eric Dion, Anne Barrette, Véronique Dupéré & Douglas Fuchs. 2015. Efficacy of an intervention to enhance reading comprehension of students with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education 36(3). 131–142.
Saldaña, David & Uta Frith. 2007. Do readers with autism make bridging inferences from world knowledge? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 96(4). 310–319.
Semel, Eleanor, Elisabeth H. Wiig & Wayne A. Secord. 2003. CELF-4: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 4th edn. Bromma, Sweden: Pearson.
Shah, Amitta & Uta Frith. 1983. An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 24(4). 613–619.
Villiers, Jessica de, Brooke Myers & Robert J. Stainton. 2013. Revisiting pragmatic abilities in autism spectrum disorders: A follow-up study with controls. Pragmatics & Cognition 21(2). 253–269.
Wahlberg, Timothy & Joseph P. Magliano. 2004. The ability of high function individuals with autism to comprehend written discourse. Discourse Processes 38(1). 119–144.
Wechsler, David & Jack A. Naglieri. 2009. Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability. Danish version. Bromma, Sweden: Pearson Assessment.
White, Sarah J. & David Saldaña. 2011. Performance of children with autism on the Embedded Figures Test: A closer look at a popular task. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 41(11). 1565–1572.
Wimmer, Heinz & Josef Perner. 1983. Beliefs about beliefs: Representations and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13(1). 103–128.
Witkin, Herman A., C. A. Moore, Donald R. Goodenough & Patricia W. Cox. 1977. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research 47(1). 1–64.