Article published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 26:2/3 (2019) ► pp. 215238
References

[ p. 236 ]References

Babiniotis, Georgios
1998Λεξικό της Νέας Ελληνικής Γλώσσας [Dictionary of Modern Greek]. Athens: Center of Lexicology.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent
1999The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(4). 262–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardzokas, Valandis
2012Causality and connectives: From Grice to relevance. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The semantics and pragmatics of causal connectives: Conceptual and procedural aspects of Modern Greek γiati and epeiδi . In Istvan Kecskes & Jesús Romero-Trillo (eds.), Research Trends of Intercultural Pragmatics, 29–54. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Linguistic constraints on causal content: The case of Modern Greek markers. Journal of Pragmatics 60. 160–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Correction-but: A relevance-theoretic reappraisal. Language & Communication 45. 27–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Conceptual and procedural aspects of causal meaning: Corpus-analytic evidence from modern Greek. Corpus Pragmatics 1(3). 257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Distinctions in procedural meaning: Evidence from Modern Greek contrast. International Review of Pragmatics 11(1). 79–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Communication and the representation of thought: The use of audience-directed expressions in free indirect thought representations. Journal of Linguistics 46(3). 575–599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Explicature and semantics. In Steven Davis & Brendan S. Gillon (eds.), Semantics: A Reader, 1–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2016The heterogeneity of procedural meaning. Lingua 175–176. 154–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1986Conditionals: A typology. In Elisabeth Closs Traugott, Alice Ter Meulen, Judy Smitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), On conditionals, 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
1998Conditionals and Prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2006On the conceptual-procedural distinction. Style 40(1–2). 24–29.Google Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis
2010The Corpus of Greek Texts: A Reference Corpus for Modern Greek. Corpora 5 (1): 29–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 237 ]
Hall, Alison
2007Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures? Lingua 117(1). 149–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoidas, Spyros
1997From time to cause: The case of since/afu. Athens 1997.Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly
2001Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iten, Corinne
2005Linguistic meaning, truth conditions and relevance: The case of concessives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalokerinos, Alexis
2001Αφού [αfu]. In Yioryia Angouraki, Amalia Arvaniti, Dionysis Goutsos (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
2004The justifying connection, mostly in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 5(1). 27–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitis, Eliza
1982Problems connected to the notion of implicature. PhD Thesis, University of Warrick.Google Scholar
2001The case of some temporal subordinative connectives: Existential and universal quantifiers. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Greek Linguistics, 268–276. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
2002Connectives and subjectivity: Comparison of connectives an [if] and ama [if/when]. Studies in Greek Linguistics 22, 365–376. Institute of Modern Greek Studies: Manolis Triantaphyllidis.Google Scholar
2004Conditional constructions as rhetorical structures. Working Papers in Linguistics 2004, 30–51. Altintzis, Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
2006Causality and subjectivity: The causal connectives of Modern Greek. In Hanna Pishwa (ed.), Language and Memory: Aspects of Knowledge Representation (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 173), 223–267. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Semantics: Meaning in Language. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
Kriaras, Emmanuel
1995Νέο Ελληνικό Λεξικό της Σύγχρονης Ελληνικής Δημοτικής Γλώσσας [Modern Greek Dictionary]. Athens: Athens Publishing.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robyn
1971If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunction. In Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 115–150. New York: Holt, Rinchart and Winston.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stavropoulos, Dimitrios
1988Oxford Greek English Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tzartzanos, Achilleas
1996Syntax of Modern Greek [Νεοελληνική Σύνταξις], vol 2. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis Bros.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2011The conceptual-procedural distinction: Past, present and future. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface), 3–31. Wagon Lane Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 238 ]
2016Reassessing the conceptual-procedural distinction. Lingua 175–176. 5–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
1993Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1). 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar