Article published in:
Writing and the Mind
Edited by David R. Olson and Marcelo Dascal †
[Pragmatics & Cognition 21:3] 2013
► pp. 469483
Anderson, M.L
2003 “Embodied cognition: A field guide”. Artificial Intelligence 149(1): 91–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aydede, M. and Robbins, P
2009 “A short primer on situated cogniton”. In M. Aydede and P. Robbins (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–10.Google Scholar
Barton, D
2001 “Directions for literacy research: Analysing language and social practices in a textually mediated world”. Language and Education 15(2-3): 92–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A
2001 “Reasons, robots and the extended mind”. Mind & Language 16(2): 121–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Material symbols”. Philosophical Psychology 19(3): 291–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D
1998 “The extended mind”. Analysis 581: 10–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dascal, M
2002 “Language as a cognitive technology”. International Journal of Cognition and Technology 1(1): 35–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D.C
1996Kinds of Minds. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R.H
1988Literacy and Orality. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
Gee, J
2000 “The new literacy studies and the social turn ”. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanic (eds), Situated Literacies. London and New York: Routledge, 177–195.Google Scholar
Goody, J
1975Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1977The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1986The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. and Watt, I
1975 “The consequences of literacy”. In J. Goody (ed), Literacy in Traditional Societies, 27–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Haas, C
1996Writing Technology. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E
1995Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirsh, D. and Maglio, P
1994 “On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action”. Cognitive Science 18(4): 513–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroes, P
2010 “Engineering and the dual nature of technical artifacts.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 341: 51–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, M.H
1994Understanding Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McQuail, D
2002 “General introduction”. In D. McQuail (ed.) McQuail’s Reader in Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 4–19.Google Scholar
Menary, R
2006Cognitive Integration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2007 “Writing as thinking”. Language Sciences 291: 621–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyrowitz, J
1985No Sense of Place. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Medium theory”. In D. Crowley and D. Mitchell (eds), Communication Theory Today. Cambridge: Stanford University Press, 50–77.Google Scholar
O’Hara, K.P., Taylor, A., Newman, W., and Sellen, A.J
2002 “Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56(3): 269–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.R
1977 “From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing”. Harvard Educational Review 471: 257–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 “Mind and media: The epistemic functions of literacy”. Journal of Communication 38(3): 27–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The World on Paper. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, W.J
2002Orality and Literacy. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roepstorff, A
2008 “Things to think with: Words and objects as material symbols”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 3631: 2049–2054. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Street, B.V
1984Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1999 “The meanings of literacy”. In D.A. Wagner, R.L. Venezky, and B.V. Street (eds), Literacy: An International Handbook. Boulder CO.: Westview Press, 34–40.Google Scholar
Theiner, G
2011Res Cogitans Extensa. Frankfurt: Petr Lang.Google Scholar
2013 “Writing in mind”. AVANT, 4(2), 15–29.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S
1987The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 11. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Williams, R
1992Television: Technology and Cultural Form. Hanover NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. and Patel V.L
2006 “Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance”. Pragmatics and Cognition 14(2): 333–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Trybulec, Marcin
2019. Extending the Private Language Argument. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15:4  pp. 513 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.