In this article I analyse object labelling image macro internet memes as multimodal metaphors, taking the Distracted Boyfriend meme as a case study. Object labelling memes are multimodal texts in which users add labels to a stock photograph to convey messages that are often humorous or satirical in nature. Using the relevance-theoretic account of metaphor, I argue that object labelling memes are multimodal metaphors which are interpreted using the same processes as verbal metaphors. The labelling of the image guides the viewer in the construction of ad hoc concepts, and it is these ad hoc concepts that contribute to the overall meaning that is communicated. The analysis in this article is rooted in the relevance-theoretic claim that pragmatic interpretive processes are triggered by all and any ostensive acts of communication. I also draw heavily on Deirdre Wilson’s work on lexical pragmatics to show how this plays out in the case of a multimodal digital text. Memes, like verbal metaphors, do not require a special theory or framework. They can be understood as ostensive stimuli which trigger the search for an optimally relevant interpretation.
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dancygier, Barbara & Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2017. Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3). 565–598.
Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forceville, Charles & Clark, Billy. 2014. Can pictures have explicatures?. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14(3). 451–472.
Gibbs, Raymond W.1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Glucksberg, Sam. 2001. Understanding figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray, Cohn, Neil & Griffith, Bill. 2012. A user’s guide to thought and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jewitt, Carey. 2013. Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In Sara Price, Carey Jewitt & Barry Brown (eds.), SAGE handbook of digital technology research, 250–265 London: Sage.
Knobel, Michele & Lankshear, Colin. 2008. Remix: The art and craft of endless hybridization. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1). 22–33.
Miltner, Kate M.2014. “There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats”: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme. First Monday, 19(8).
Oswald, Steve & Maillat, Didier. 2018. Deceptive puns: The pragmatics of humour in puns. In Cristián N. Padilla (ed.), Perspectivas sobre el significado: Desde lo biológico a lo social, 145–171. La Serena: Editorial Universidad de la Serena.
Reboul, Anne. 1998. A relevance theoretic approach to reference. Relevance theory workshop, 45–50. University of Luton.
Reboul, Anne. 1999. Reference, agreement, evolving reference and the theory of mental representations. In Martine Coene (ed.), Traiani Augusti vestigia pressa sequamur :studia 1 lingvistica in honorem L. Tasmowki, 601–616. Padova: Unipress.
Recanati, François. 2012. Mental files. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recanati, François. 2014. Mental files and identity. In Anne Reboul (ed.) Mind, values, metaphysics: Philosophical papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan. University of Geneva.
Scott, Kate. 2020. Referring expressions, pragmatics, and style: Reference and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scott, Kate. 2021a. The pragmatics of rebroadcasting content on Twitter: How is retweeting relevant?Journal of Pragmatics, 1841. 52–60.
Segev, Elad, Nissenbaum, Asaf, Stolero, Nathan & Shifman, Limor. 2015. Families and networks of internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4). 417–433.
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1986/95. Relevance: Communciation and cognition. Second edition (with postface) ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1998. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In Peter Carruthers & Jill Boucher (eds.), Language and thought, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.2008. A deflationary account of metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 84–105. Cambridge: Camrbidge University Press.
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 2015. Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 15(44). 117–149.
Wharton, Tim. 2009. Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre. 2003. Relevance and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 15(2). 273–292.
Wilson, Deirdre & Carston, Robyn. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 230–260. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, Deirdre & Carston, Robyn. 2019. Pragmatics and the challenge of “non-propositional” effects. Journal of Pragmatics,
145
1. 31–38.
Wilson, Deirdre & Kolaiti, Patricia. 2017. Lexical pragmatics and implicit communication. In Piotr Cap & Marta Dynel (eds.), Implicitness: From lexis to discourse, 147–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2024. Embodying scenes of moral disorder: Bodily gestures as a site of signification in feminist TikTok activism. Nordic Journal of Media Studies 6:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Wang, Jingjing, Joshua Luo, Grace Yang, Allen Hong & Feng Luo
2023. 2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), ► pp. 1338 ff.
Yus, Francisco
2023. Meme-Mediated Humorous Communication. In Pragmatics of Internet Humour, ► pp. 245 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.