Article published In:
Creativity, Cognition and Material CultureEdited by Lambros Malafouris, Chris Gosden and Karenleigh A. Overmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:1] 2014
► pp. 5–26
Edited by Lambros Malafouris, Chris Gosden and Karenleigh A. Overmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:1] 2014
► pp. 5–26
The importance of chance and interactivity in creativity
Individual creativity is standardly treated as an ‘internalist’ process occurring solely in the head. An alternative, more interactionist view is presented here, where working with objects, media and other external things is seen as a fundamental component of creative thought. The value of chance interaction and chance cueing — practices widely used in the creative arts — is explored briefly in an account of the creative method of choreographer Wayne McGregor and then more narrowly in an experimental study that compared performance on a Scrabble-like word discovery problem. Subjects were presented with seven letters and given two minutes to call out three-to-seven-letter English words. There were three conditions: The tiles were fixed in place, subjects were free to move the tiles manually or the tiles could be randomly shuffled. Results showed that random shuffling was best, with manual movement second. Three reasons are provided: Shuffling is faster and cheaper than mentally thinking of candidates; randomizing strings covers the search space better than a deterministic method based on past successes; and randomizing is equivalent to adding diversity to a team, which is known empirically to lead to more creative solutions.
Keywords: interactivity, Scrabble, choreography, randomness, problem solving, Creativity, thinking
References
Barrett, F.J
1998 “Coda—Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning”. Organization Science 9(5):605–622. 
Bergdoll, B., Dickerman, L., Buchloh, B. and Doherty, B
2009 Bauhaus 1919–1933. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
Bunt, A., Lank, E. and Terry, M
2009 “Understanding the role of computers in mathematical problem solving”. Mathematical User-Interfaces Workshop 2009. Retrieved from [URL]
Campbell, D.T
1960 Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review 67(6): 380–400.
Clark, A
2006 “Soft selves and ecological control”. In Ross, D., Spurrett, D., Kincaid, H. and Stephens, G.L. (eds), Distributed Cognition and the Will: Individual Volition and Social Context . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 101–122.
2008 Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cowley, S. and Vallée-Tourangeau, F
2010 “Thinking in action”. AI & Society 25(4): 469–475.
Duncker, K
1945 On Problem Solving. Less, L.S. (trans.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Gilhooly K.J. and Murphy, P
2005 “Differentiating insight from non-insight problems”. Thinking & Reasoning 11(3):279–302.
Glucksberg, S
1964 “Functional fixedness: Problem solution as a function of observing responses”. Psychonomic Science 1(1–12): 117–118.
Grice, P
1975 “Logic and conversation”. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J.L. (eds), Syntax and Semantics. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
Guilford, J.P
1967 The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E. and Kirsh, D
2000 “Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research”. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7(2): 174–196.
Katona, G
1940 Organizing and Memorizing. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kaufman, J.C. and Sternberg, R.J
(eds) 2010 The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keefe, S.P
2006 “Rochlitz, (Johann) Friedrich”. In Eisen, C. and Keefe, S.P., (eds), The Cambridge Mozart Encyclopedia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 427–428.
Kirsh, D
1990 “When is information explicitly represented?” The Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science. Reissued by Oxford University Press, 19921, 340–365.
2009 “Problem solving and situated cognition”. In Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 264–306.
Kirsh, D., Muntanyola, D., Jao, J., Lew, A., and Sugihara, M
2009 “Choreographic methods for creating novel, high quality dance”. In Chen, L.-L., Feijs, L., Hessler, M., Kyffin, S., Liu, P.-L., Overbeeke, K. and Young, B. (eds), Proceedings of Design and Semantics of Form and Movement DeSForM 2009 October 26–27, 2009, Taipei, Taiwan. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., 188–195.
Kirsh, D
2013 “Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design”. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20(1): 1–30.
Kirsh, D. and Maglio, P.P
1994 “On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic actions”. Cognitive Science 18(4): 513–549.
Knapp, J
2014 “Google ventures: Your design team needs a war room. Here’s how to set one up”. Retrieved from [URL]
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S. and Raney, G.E
2001 “An eye movement study of insight problem solving”. Memory & Cognition 29(7): 1000–1009.
Kohler, W
1925 The Mentality of Apes. Winter, E. (trans.). London: Kegan Paul.
Kurtzberg, T
2005 “Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams”. Creativity Research Journal 17(1): 51–65.
Leong, T., Howard, S. and Vetere, F
2008 “Take a chance on me: Using randomness for the design of digital devices”. Interactions 15(3): 16–19.
Maglio, P.P., Matlock, T., Raphaely, D., Chernicky, B. and Kirsh, D
1999 “Interactive skills in Scrabble”. In Hahn, M. and Stoness, S.C. (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 326–330.
Martindale, C
1999 “Biological bases of creativity”. In Sternberg, R.J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–152.
Motwani, R. and Raghavan, P
Neustein, D
Norman, D.A
1993 Things That Make Us Smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ohlsson, S
1992 “Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena”. In Keane, M.T. and Gilhooly, K.J. (eds), Advances in the Psychology of Thinking. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf, 1–44.
Polya, G
1957 How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Rabin, M.O
1976 “Probabilistic algorithms”. In Traub, J.F. (ed.), Algorithms and Complexity. New York: Academic Press, 21–40.
Reis, D
2013 “Let randomness kick-start your creativity”. Thinkergy Innovation Company. Retrieved from [URL].
Rochlitz, F
(ed.) 1815 Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung 171: 561–566.
Schiller, P.H
1957 “Innate motor action as a basis of learning”. In Schiller, C.H. (ed. and trans.), Instinctive Behavior. New York: International Universities Press, 264–287.
Schön, D.A
1992 “Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation”. Research in Engineering Design 3(3): 131–147.
Simonton, D.K
2011 “Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark”. Review of General Psychology 15(2): 158–174.
Sutton, R.I
2001 “The weird rules of creativity”. Harvard Business Review 79(8): 94–103.
Suwa, M. and Tversky, B
1997 “What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis”. Design Studies 18(4): 385–403.
Tideman, K
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Weller, A. and Villejoubert, G
2011 “Distributed cognition and insight problem solving”. In
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 273–278.
Vartanian, O
2009 “Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving”. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3(1): 57–59.
Vyzoviti, S. and Dimitriou, M
2012 “The grasping hand as form generator: Generative modelling in physical and digital media”. In Liveneau, P. and Marin, P. (eds), MC2012 Symposium: Materiality in Its Contemporary Forms: Architectural Perception, Fabrication and Conception. Villefontaine: Les Grands Ateliers de l’Isle D’Abeau, 91–99.
Weller, A., Villejoubert, G. and Vallée-Tourangeau, F
2011 “Interactive insight problem solving”. Thinking & Reasoning 17(4): 424–439.
Wertheimer, M
1961 Productive Thinking (rev. ed.). London: Tavistock.
Cited by
Cited by 32 other publications
Andolina, Salvatore, Valeria Orso, Hendrik Schneider, Khalil Klouche, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Luciano Gamberini & Giulio Jacucci
2018. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ► pp. 1295 ff. 
Barranco, Oriol, Carlos Lozares & Sara Moreno
2017. The work process setting and situational contexts based on socially distributed cognition: an interactive, cognitive and social proposal of analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 47:4 ► pp. 481 ff.
Booton, Sophie A., Pinar Kolancali & Victoria A. Murphy
2023. Touchscreen apps for child creativity: An evaluation of creativity apps designed for young children. Computers & Education 201 ► pp. 104811 ff.
Coolidge, Frederick L
2021. The role of the cerebellum in creativity and expert stone knapping. Adaptive Behavior 29:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
Cowley, Stephen J.
2015. How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Currie, Adrian & Anton Killin
2019. From things to thinking: Cognitive archaeology. Mind & Language 34:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Dou, Xinyu, Lin Jia & Jinchuan Ge
2021. Improvisational Dance-Based Psychological Training of College Students’ Dance Improvement. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus
2019. Interactivity and Languaging. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15:4 ► pp. 653 ff.
Kimmel, Michael & Camilla Groth
2023. What affords being creative? Opportunities for novelty in light of perception, embodied activity, and imaginative skill. Adaptive Behavior
Kimmel, Michael & Camilla Groth
2023. An “in vivo” analysis of crafts practices and creativity—Why affordances provide a productive lens. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Kimmel, Michael & Dayana Hristova
2021. The Micro-genesis of Improvisational Co-creation. Creativity Research Journal 33:4 ► pp. 347 ff.
Kimmel, Michael, Dayana Hristova & Kerstin Kussmaul
2018. Sources of Embodied Creativity: Interactivity and Ideation in Contact Improvisation. Behavioral Sciences 8:6 ► pp. 52 ff.
Kimmel, Michael & Christine Irran
2022. Decision-making in Shiatsu bodywork: complementariness of embodied coupling and conceptual inference. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Longley, Alys & Barbara Kensington-Miller
2019. “Under the radar”: exploring “invisible” graduate attributes in tertiary dance education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 11:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Lottridge, Danielle, Rebecca Weber, Eva-Rae McLean, Hazel Williams, Joanna Cook & Huidong Bai
2022. 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), ► pp. 93 ff.
McCarty, Willard
2021. As perceived, not as known: digital enquiry and the art of intelligence. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 46:3 ► pp. 325 ff.
McLay, Grant, Lee McGowan, Gene Moyle & Laurent Frossard
2020. Building Fields of Play: An examination of the use of notational analysis to reinterpret dynamic and sequential movement from Rugby Union to inform the creation of a new dance work. Choreographic Practices 11:1 ► pp. 163 ff.
Overmann, Karenleigh A. & Thomas Wynn
2019. Materiality and Human Cognition. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 26:2 ► pp. 457 ff.
Ross, Wendy
2022. Creative Ignorance. In Embodied, Extended, Ignorant Minds [Synthese Library, 463], ► pp. 37 ff.
Ross, Wendy
2023. The possibilities of disruption: Serendipity, accidents and impasse driven search. Possibility Studies & Society 1:4 ► pp. 489 ff.
Ross, Wendy
2024. Serendipity: The Role of Chance and Accidents in Creativity. Creativity Research Journal ► pp. 1 ff.
Ross, Wendy & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
2021. Catch that word: interactivity, serendipity and verbal fluency in a word production task. Psychological Research 85:2 ► pp. 842 ff.
Ross, Wendy & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
2022. Accident and agency: a mixed methods study contrasting luck and interactivity in problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning 28:4 ► pp. 487 ff.
Schiavio, Andrea & Luc Nijs
2022. Implementation of a Remote Instrumental Music Course Focused on Creativity, Interaction, and Bodily Movement. Preliminary Insights and Thematic Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Spowage, Neal
2018. Applying Kinaesthetic Empathy and Extended Mind Theory to Invasive and Discreet Instruments in Sound-Based Live Performance. Organised Sound 23:3 ► pp. 277 ff.
Steffensen, Sune Vork, Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau & Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
2016. Cognitive events in a problem-solving task: a qualitative method for investigating interactivity in the 17 Animals problem. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 28:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Turpie, Edward Jonathan
2020. Drawing Ed Ruscha. Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice 5:2 ► pp. 291 ff.
Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric, Sune Vork Steffensen, Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau & Miroslav Sirota
2016. Insight with hands and things. Acta Psychologica 170 ► pp. 195 ff.
Zappi, Victor & Andrew McPherson
2018. Hackable Instruments: Supporting Appropriation and Modification in Digital Musical Interaction. Frontiers in ICT 5
Спиридонов, Владимир, Мария Ерофеева, Нильс Кловайт, Владлен Ардисламов, Максим Морозов & Стево Здилар
2021. Репликация эффектов интерактивного решения задач спичечной алгебры. Психологические исследования 14:79
[no author supplied]
2016. Design of Visualizations for Human-Information Interaction [Synthesis Lectures on Visualization, ],
[no author supplied]
2017. Research in the Wild [Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, ],
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.