Creativity is often portrayed as an X-factor that accounts for the spontaneous generation of the absolutely new. Yet the obsession with novelty implies a focus on final products and a retrospective attribution of their forms to unprecedented ideas in the minds of individuals, at the expense of any recognition of the form-generating potentials of the relations and processes in which persons and things are made and grown. In these processes, practitioners are characteristically called upon to copy the works of past masters. However, though they may be guided by a script or score, every practitioner has to improvise his or her own passage through the array of tasks the performance entails. With examples from music, calligraphy and lace-making, I show that the wellsprings of creativity lie not inside people’s heads, but in their attending upon a world in formation. In this kind of creativity, undergone rather than done, imagination is not so much the capacity to come up with new ideas as the aspirational impulse of a life that is not just lived but led. But where it leads is not yet given. In opening to the unknown — in exposure — imagination leads not by mastery but by submission. Thus the creativity of undergoing, of action without agency, is that of life itself.
Benveniste, É. 1971. “Active and middle voice in the verb”. In Benveniste, É. (ed.), Problems in General Linguistics. Meek, M.E. (trans.). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, 145–151.
Bergson, H. 1911. Creative Evolution. Mitchell, A. (trans.). London: Macmillan.
Boden, M. 1990. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 2004. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Massumi, B. (trans.). London: Continuum.
Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ingold, T. 1986. Evolution and Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. 2001. “From the transmission of representations to the education of attention”. In Whitehouse, H. (ed.), The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology Versus Ethnography. Oxford: Berg, 113–153.
Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ingold, T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ingold, T. and Hallam, E. 2007. “Creativity and cultural improvisation: An introduction”. In E. Hallam and T. Ingold (eds), Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg, 1–24.
Kubler, G. 1962. The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
Liep, 2001. “Introduction”. In Liep, J. (ed.), Locating Cultural Creativity. London: Pluto Press, 1–13.
Makovicky, N. 2010. “‘Something to talk about’: Notation and knowledge-making among Central Slovak lace-makers”. In Marchand, T.H.J. (ed.), Making Knowledge: Explorations of the Indissoluble Relation Between Mind, Body and Environment. London: Royal Anthropological Institute, 76–94.
Masschelein, J. 2010. “E-ducating the gaze: The idea of a poor pedagogy”. Ethics and Education 5(1): 43–53.
McLean, S. 2009. “Stories and cosmogonies: Imagining creativity beyond ‘nature’ and ‘culture’”. Cultural Anthropology 24(2): 213–245.
Nakamura, F. 2007. “Creating or performing words? Observations on contemporary Japanese calligraphy”. In Hallam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds), Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg, 79–98.
Oakeshott, M. 1991. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
Ortega y Gasset, J. 1961. History as a System And Other Essays Toward a Philosophy of History. New York: W. W. Norton.
Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. 1992. “The psychological foundations of culture”. In Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–136.
Waldenfels, B. 2004. “Bodily experience between selfhood and otherness”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3(3): 235–248.
Whitehead, A.N. 1929. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wieman, H.N. 1961. Intellectual Foundations of Faith. London: Vision Press.
Wilf, E. 2012. “Rituals of creativity: tradition, modernity, and the ‘acoustic unconscious’ in a U.S. collegiate jazz music program”. American Anthropologist 114(1): 32–44.
Yen, Y. 2005. Calligraphy and Power in Contemporary Chinese Society. London: Routledge Curzon.
Cited by (34)
Cited by 34 other publications
Hermans, Carolien
2024. The storyline approach as a didactic tool to promote efficacy beliefs of (student) teachers in creative music activities with young children. Research Studies in Music Education
Kimmel, Michael & Camilla Groth
2024. What affords being creative? Opportunities for novelty in light of perception, embodied activity, and imaginative skill. Adaptive Behavior 32:3 ► pp. 225 ff.
Morgan, Jennie & Shelley Castle
2024. Arts–Research Collaboration: Reflections on Collaboration as Creative Method. Qualitative Inquiry 30:3-4 ► pp. 291 ff.
Raposo, Paulo
2024. Performances políticas e artivismo. Novos Debates 8:1
Peschl, Markus F. & Thomas Fundneider
2023. Co-Becoming: How to Shape Desirable Futures in Highly Uncertain Times. In Die menschliche (Hoch)schule - Human(e) Education, ► pp. 19 ff.
Santi, Marina & Elisabetta Ghedin
2023. Philosophical Inquiry and the Childness of Communities: Connective Capabilities for Flourishing Education. In Reparative Futures and Transformative Learning Spaces, ► pp. 239 ff.
Currie, Adrian
2022. Speculation Made Material: Experimental Archaeology and Maker’s Knowledge. Philosophy of Science 89:2 ► pp. 337 ff.
Mandalaki, Emmanouela, Noortje van Amsterdam & Ely Daou
2022. The meshwork of teaching against the grain: embodiment, affect and art in management education. Culture and Organization 28:3-4 ► pp. 245 ff.
2022. Design, artesanato e participação: reflexões para a autonomia produtiva de mulheres no Maranhão.. DAT Journal 7:4 ► pp. 124 ff.
Dereclenne, Emilien
2021. Simondon and enaction: the articulation of life, subjectivity, and technics. Adaptive Behavior 29:5 ► pp. 449 ff.
Förster, Yvonne
2021. Colorear por números: la tecnología digital y el arte de vivir. Arbor 197:800 ► pp. a602 ff.
Förster, Yvonne
2022. In favour of a hedonist post-pandemic culture: Embodying new technologies and old rituals. Technoetic Arts 20:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Kimmel, Michael & Dayana Hristova
2021. The Micro-genesis of Improvisational Co-creation. Creativity Research Journal 33:4 ► pp. 347 ff.
Zenk, Lukas, Nicole Hynek, Stephanie A. Krawinkler, Markus F. Peschl & Günther Schreder
2021. Supporting innovation processes using material artefacts: Comparing the use of LEGO bricks and moderation cards as boundary objects. Creativity and Innovation Management 30:4 ► pp. 845 ff.
Atkinson, Anne‐Marie
2020. Being Alongside and Becoming Researcher: Art Practice, Accountability and Convergence in the Studio. International Journal of Art & Design Education 39:4 ► pp. 855 ff.
Daněk, Clare
2020. Revealing All. Performance Research 25:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
2020. Incubation and interactivity in insight problem solving. Psychological Research 84:1 ► pp. 128 ff.
Kaiser, Alexander & Markus F. Peschl
2020. The role of self-transcending knowledge in Senge’s understanding of learning organizations towards an interdisciplinary taxonomy of self-transcending knowledge. The Learning Organization 27:6 ► pp. 527 ff.
MacRae, Christina
2020. Tactful hands and vibrant mattering in the sand tray. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 20:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Pelland, Jean-Charles
2020. What’s new: innovation and enculturation of arithmetical practices. Synthese 197:9 ► pp. 3797 ff.
2022. Insight. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 779 ff.
Hornberger, Julia
2019. Who is the fake one now? Questions of quackery, worldliness and legitimacy. Critical Public Health 29:4 ► pp. 484 ff.
March, Paul Louis
2019. Playing with clay and the uncertainty of agency. A Material Engagement Theory perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Peschl, Markus F.
2019. Unlearning towards an uncertain future: on the back end of future-driven unlearning. The Learning Organization 26:5 ► pp. 454 ff.
Peschl, Markus F.
2019. Design and Innovation as Co‐creating and Co‐becoming with the Future. Design Management Journal 14:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Peschl, Markus F.
2024. Human innovation and the creative agency of the world in the age of generative AI. Possibility Studies & Society 2:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Barbieri, Gian Luca & Alessandro Musetti
2018. The trans-autobiographical writing in the psychiatric context. Journal of Poetry Therapy 31:3 ► pp. 173 ff.
Garcia-Lorenzo, Lucia, Paul Donnelly, Lucia Sell-Trujillo & J. Miguel Imas
2018. Liminal Entrepreneuring: The Creative Practices of Nascent Necessity Entrepreneurs. Organization Studies 39:2-3 ► pp. 373 ff.
Jornet, Alfredo & Wolff-Michael Roth
2018. Imagining design: Transitive and intransitive dimensions. Design Studies 56 ► pp. 28 ff.
Romankiewicz, Tanja
2018. The Line, the Void and the Current: Iron Age Art from a Design Theory Perspective. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 37:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Colin, Thomas R., Tony Belpaeme, Angelo Cangelosi & Nikolas Hemion
2016. Hierarchical reinforcement learning as creative problem solving. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 86 ► pp. 196 ff.
Trowsdale, Jo
2016. Imagineering: Re-Creating Spaces through Collaborative Art-Making. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications 3:2 ► pp. 274 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.