Article published in:
Diagrammatic Reasoning
Edited by Riccardo Fusaroli and Kristian Tylén
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:2] 2014
► pp. 187–205

Diagrams, jars, and matchsticks

A systemicist’s toolkit

| Kingston University
Participants in cognitive psychology experiments on reasoning and problem solving are commonly sequestered: Efforts are made to impoverish the physical context in which the problem is presented, decoupling people from the richer and modifiable environment that naturally instantiates it outside the lab. Sense-making activities are constrained, but this conforms to the strong internalist and individualist commitments implicit to these research efforts: Cognition reflects internal computations and the scientists’ toils must focus on the individual and what she is thinking, decoupled from the world. We contrast this position with one that identifies cognition as the product of a cognitive system that is configured and enacted by, minimally, an agent and the world in which she is embedded. We review work on the psychology of hypothesis testing and problem solving and argue that refocusing research efforts on the dynamic agent-environment couplings that generate cognitive products — such as a problem representation, a hypothesis or a problem solution — offers a much richer set of methodological opportunities to unveil how people actually think outside the cognitive psychologist’s laboratory. We conclude by exploring the ontological implications of a systemic perspective on cognition.
Keywords: interactivity, Reasoning, cognitive ecosystem
Published online: 11 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.02val
References
Baber, C., Parekh, M., Cengiz, T.G
(2014) Tool use as distributed cognition: How tools help, hinder and define manual skill. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1161, 1–16Google Scholar
Bilalić, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F
(2008) Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition, 1081, 652–661. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolland, B.R
(2011) Distributed cognition as a lens to understand the effects of scaffolds: The role of transfer of responsibility. Educational Psychology Review, 231, 577–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. St. B.T
in press). Reasoning, biases and dual processes: The lasting impact of Wason (1960). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Fleck, J.I., & Weisberg, R.W
(2013) Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 251, 436–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M., & Ball, L.J
(2006) Dual-goal facilitation in Wason’s 2-4-6 task: What mediates successful rule discovery? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 591, 873–885. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilhooly, K.J., & Fioratou, E
(2009) Executive functions in insight versus non-insight problem solving: An individual differences approach. Thinking and Reasoning, 151, 355–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giere, R
(2006) Scientific perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Järvilehto, T
(1998) The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 331, 321–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J
(1960) On the Einstellung effect in problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 163–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirsh, D
(1995) Complementary strategies: Why we use our hands when we think. In J.M. Moore & J.L. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 212–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
(2009) Projection, problem space and anchoring. In N. Taatgen, H. van Rijn, J. Nerbonne & L. Schomaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 2310–2315). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
(2013) Thinking with external representation. In S.J. Cowley, & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 171–194). London: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G.E
(2001) An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 291, 1000–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D
(1999) Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 251, 1534–1555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luchins, A.S
(1942) Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monograph, 541 (Whole No. 248). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maglio, P.P., Matlock, T., Raphaely, D., Chernicky, B., & Kirsh, D
(1999) Interactive skills in Scrabble. In M. Hahn, & S.C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 326–330). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L
(2013) How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. London: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R.E
(1995) The search for insight: Grappling with Gestalt psychology’s unanswered questions. Insight and problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg and J.E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 3–32). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S.
(1992) Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M.T. Keane & K.J. Gilhooly (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (pp. 1–44). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S
(2011) Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K
(1935/1992) The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ross, L.D., Amabile, T.A., & Steinmetz, J.L
(1977) Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 351, 485–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segal, E
(2004) Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 161, 141–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steffensen, S.V
(2013) Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In S.J. Cowley, & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 195–221). London: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Distributed language and dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity. Language Sciences, 501, 105–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H.A
(1996) The sciences of the artificial (3rd edition). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Turvey, M.T., & Shaw, R.E
(1999) Ecological foundations of cognition I: Symmetry and specificity of animal-environment systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (11-12), 95–110.Google Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, F
(2014) Insight, interactivity and materiality. Pragmatics & Cognition, 221, 27–44.Google Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Austin, N.G., & Rankin, S
(1995) Inducing a rule in Wason’s 2-4-6 task: A test of the information-quantity and goal-complementarity hypotheses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A1, 895–914. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Euden, G., & Hearn, V
(2011) Einstellung defused: Interactivity and mental set. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 641, 1889–1895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Payton, T
(2008) Graphical representation fosters discovery in the 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 611, 625–640. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Steffensen, S.V., Vallée-Tourangeau, G, & Makri, A
(2015). Insight and cognitive ecosystems. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A.S. Warlaumont>, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C.D. Jennings, & P.P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2457–2462).Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F
(2014) The spatio-temporal dynamics of systemic thinking. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 211, 113–127.Google Scholar
Van Der Henst, J.-B., Rossi, S., & Schroyens, W
(2002) When participants are not misled they are not so bad after all: A pragmatic analysis of a rule discovery task. In W.D. Gray & C.D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 902–908). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Van Stockum, C., & DeCaro, M.S
(2013) The path less taken: When working memory capacity constrains insight. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3633–3638). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Wason, P.C
(1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 121, 129–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weller, A., Villejoubert, G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F
(2011) Interactive insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 171, 429–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, M
(1959) Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., & Norman, D.A
(1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 181, 87–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Bianchi, Ivana, Elena Capitani, Erika Branchini, Ugo Savardi & Roberto Burro
2021. Naïve intuitions about what constitutes “an opposite process”. Journal of Cognitive Psychology ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Fusaroli, Riccardo & Kristian Tylén
2014. Diagrammatic reasoning. Pragmatics & Cognition 22:2 ► pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo
Ross, Wendy & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
2021. Rewilding Cognition: Complex Dynamics in Open Experimental Systems. Journal of Trial and Error 2:1 Crossref logo
Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric & Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
2020.  In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric & Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
2020. Mapping systemic resources in problem solving. New Ideas in Psychology 59 ► pp. 100812 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.