Article published In:
Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 22:3 (2014) ► pp.352–372
Searle vs. Searle on language, speech, and thought
Searle’s (1963/1991) account of the communicative intentions in speech acts purports to be an advance over that of Grice (1957), in acknowledging the ineliminable role of the linguistic (usage) rules in enabling the hearer to recognize the speaker’s communicative intentions. In this paper we argue that, given some plausible assumptions about ordinary speech exchanges, Searle’s insight on this score is incompatible with his (1983) commitment to internalism in the philosophy of mind. As a result, Searle cannot have it both ways: either he must give up his core insight regarding the ineliminable role of linguistic (usage) rules in the hearer’s recognition of a speaker’s communicative intentions, or he must give up his commitment to internalism the philosophy of mind. We conclude by arguing that this lesson is generic: the forced choice is one that all theorists must face, insofar as we theorize about the role of language in the communication of thought through speech.
References (15)
Bach, K., & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burge, T. (1989). Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4(1), 73–121. 
. (1986a). Individualism and psychology. The Philosophical Review, 95(1), 3–45.
. (1986b). Cartesian error and the objectivity of perception. In S. Merril (Ed.), The Contents of Thought. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Dretske, F. (1997). Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grice, P. (1957) Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 661, 377–388.
Kaplan, D. (1978). Dthat. Syntax and Semantics, 91, 221–243.
Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge: MIT press.
. (2005). Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of meaning. Reprinted in H. Putnam (Ed.), Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
. (1996). Introduction. In A. Pessin & S. Goldberg (Eds.), The Twin Earth Chronicles: 20 Years of Reflections on Hilary Putnam’s “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Searle, J. (1963/1991). What is a speech act? Reprinted in S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 254–264). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (1975/1991). Indirect speech acts. Reprinted in S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 265–277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.