Although researchers have paid much attention to the journey metaphor (e.g., Forceville, 2006a, 2011a, 2011b; Forceville & Jeulink, 2011), little seems known about its role for moral political cognition. Using data from the US and UK public discourses on the Euro crisis as an example, this paper draws on Lakoff’s (1996) Moral Politics Theory, demonstrating that the journey metaphor can play a crucial role for political cognition, and especially for moral political judgment.
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2013). Metaphor of the global financial crisis after 2008: Reconstructing confidence by Arab and Western financial medias. Sciences de la Société, 881, 161–182.
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2015). Messaging battles in the Eurozone crisis discourse: A critical cognitive study. (Doctoral thesis). Lodz University: Poland.
Abdel-Raheem, A. (forthcoming). Can cartoons influence Americans’ attitudes toward bailouts?Visual Communication Quarterly, 23(3).
Barthes, R. (1986/1964) Rhetoric of the image. In The Responsibility of Forms (trans. R. Howard) (pp. 21–40) Oxford: Blackwell.
Baker, T. (1996). On the genealogy of moral hazard. Texas Law Review, 75(2), 237–292.
Bobrow, S., & Bell, B. (1973). On catching idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, I1, 343–346.
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229.
Brewer, P.R. (2002). Framing, value words, and citizen’s explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 191, 303–316.
Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1994). Understanding figurative language. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 447–478). San Diego: Academic Press.
Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G. (1989). Foreign policy by metaphor. CRL Newsletter, 3(5), 5–19.
Chomsky, N. (1995). Education is ignorance. In N. Chomsky (19961) (Ed.), Class Warfare: Interviews with David Barsamian. UK: Pluto Press.
Coull, S. (2006). Are You Wearing a Barrel? Bloomington: AuthorHouse.
Coulson, S. (1997). Semantic Leaps: The role of frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. (Doctoral thesis). UC San Diego.
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–96.
El Refaie, E. (2009). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 173–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fellbaum, C. (1993). The determiner in English idioms. In C. Cacciari, & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 271–295). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 361, 268–307.
Fillmore, C.J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 61, 222–254.
Forceville, C. (2006a). The source-path-goal schema in the autobiographical journey documentary: McElwee, van der Keuken, Cole. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 4(3), 241–261.
Forceville, C. (2006b). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C. (2011a). The journey metaphor and the source-path-goal schema in Agnès Varda’s autobiographical gleaning documentaries. In M. Fludernik (Ed.), Beyond Cognitive Metaphor Theory: Perspectives on Literary Metaphor (pp. 281–297). London: Routledge.
Forceville, C. (2011b). Structural pictorial and multimodal metaphor. Lecture 7/8 (±10,000 words & 30 pictures) of the Course in pictorial and multimodal metaphor. [URL]
Forceville, C. (2014). Relevance theory as a model for multimodal communication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual Communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 341, 1430–;14511.
Geldard, R. (2000). The Traveler’s Key to Ancient Greece: A Guide to Sacred Places. Wheaton: The Theosophical Publishing House.
Gibbs, R.W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 161, 317–333.
Gibbs, R.W., Nayak, N.P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 281, 576–593.
Glucksberg, S. (1998). Understanding metaphors. Current Directions, 71, 39–43.
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 71, 92–96.
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M., & Cacciari, C. (1990, November). Understanding idioms: the psychology of allusion. Paper presented at the 31st annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Gommers, H. (2001). Europa: What’s in a Name. Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Grady, J. (2007). Metaphor. In D. Geeraetes & C. Hurberts (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–213). New York: Oxford University Press.
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson S. (1999). Bleding and metaphor. In W. Gibbs, & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hampe, B. (2005). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hochschild, J. (1981). What’s Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jaskolski, H. (1997). The Labyrinth: Symbol of Fear, Rebirth, and Liberation. Boston: Shambhala
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Katz, A., & Taylor, T.E. (2008). The journeys of life: Examining a conceptual metaphor with semantic and episodic memory recall. Metaphor and Symbol, 231, 148–173.
Knipfel, J. (2013). The bankruptcy barrel: A historical debate. The Chisler. Retrieved from April 12, 2015: [URL]
Koller, V. (2008). ‘Not just a colour’: Pink as a gender and sexuality marker in visual communication”. Visual Communication, 7(4), 433–461.
Koller, V. (2009). Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 45–71). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The conceptual theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1995). Metaphor, morality, and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust. Social Research, 62(2), 177–213.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral Politics: How Conservatives and Liberals Think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1999, December). Metaphorical thought in foreign policy: Why strategic framing matters. University of California at Berkeley & Rockridge Institute. Retrieved from [URL]
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Lakoff, G. (2006). Whose Freedom? The Battle Over America’s most Important Idea. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Lakoff, G. (2008a). The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st Century Politics with an 18th Century Brain. New York, NY: Viking.
Lakoff, G. (2008b, October2). The Palin choice and the reality of the political mind. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from 11/10/2012: [URL]
Lakoff, G. (2012, December3). Why it’s hard to replace the ‘fiscal cliff’ metaphor. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from 10/10/2013 [URL]
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Landau, M.J., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1421–1427.
Ritchie, D.L. (2008). X is a journey: Embodied simulation in metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 231, 174–199.
Scholz, R. (1987). Some issues in the theory of metaphor. In S. Petöfi (Ed.), Text and discourse constitution: Empirical aspects, theoretical approaches (pp. 269–282). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Seddon, R. (1995). Europa: A spiritual biography. London: Temple Lodge.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance Theory: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Swinney, D., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 181, 523–538.
Talmy, L. (1985). Force dynamics in language and thought. Papers from the parasession on causatives and agentivity at the twenty-first regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 293–337). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Thibodeau, P., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.
Thibodeau, P., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961.
Turner, M. (1987). Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Van de Voort, M., & Vonk, W. (1995). You don’t die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms. In M. Everaert, E-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 283–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wehling, E. (2013). A nation under joint custody: How conflicting family models divide US politics. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of California, Berkeley.
Wehling, E., Bartlett, J., & Norrie, R. (2015). Using Moral Politics Theory to Understand Populist Politics: Populism and its Moral Siblings. London: Demos.
Wehling, E., Feinberg, M, Saslow, L., Melvær, W., & Lakoff, G. (2014). A moral house divided: How idealized family models explain political polarization. (Manuscript submitted for publication).
Yu, N. (2009). Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 119–143). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Yuan, Guorong & Yi Sun
2023. A bibliometric study of metaphor research and its implications (2010–2020). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:3 ► pp. 227 ff.
Zhang, Cun
2021. The Sino–US trade war in political cartoons: A synthesis of semiotic, cognitive, and cultural perspectives. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
Negro Alousque, Isabel
2020. The Metaphorical Representation of Brexit in Digital Political Cartoons. Visual Communication Quarterly 27:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.