Article published In:
Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses: Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Piasecki
[Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2] 2022
► pp. 297323
References
Aijmer, Karin
2002English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude
1979Délocutivité benvenistéenne, délocutivité généralisée et performativité. Langue française 421. 69–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartkova, Katarina, Alice Bastien & Mathilde Dargnat
2016How to be a discourse particle? In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016, 859–863. Boston: Boston University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate, Ludivine Crible & Minna Kirjavainen
2022Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effect of exposure on the perception and production of um . Language and Speech 65(2). 263–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béguelin, Marie-José & Gilles Corminboeuf
2017 Ou comme ça, machin et autres marqueurs d’indétermination dans les listes. Discours 201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Roxane & Catherine Chanet
2005Fonctions pragmatiques et prosodie de enfin en français spontané. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 171. 41–68.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2021Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Computer program, version 6.1.50. [URL]
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
1986An introduction to English prosody. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Brechtje Post, Mathieu Avanzi, Carolin Buthke, Albert Di Cristo, Ingo Feldhausen, Sun-Ah Jun, Philippe Martin, Trudel Meisenburg, Annie Rialland, Rafèu Sichel-Bazin & Hi-Yon Yoo
2015Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonation in Romance, 63–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dictionnaire historique de la langue française (DHLF)
1998 Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie
1992Extension particles, etc. Language Variation and Change 41. 179–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducard, Dominique
2017L’histoire d’un truc . Linx: Revue des linguistes de l’Université Paris Nanterre 741. 17–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche
2002La phonologie du français contemporain: Usages, variétés et structure. In Claus Pusch & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik : Korpora und gesprochene Sprache [Romance corpus linguistics: Corpora and spoken language], 93–106. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E.
1985A unified theory of syntactic categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eychenne, Julien
2018Dolmen: A program for the analysis of speech corpora. Computer program, version 2.0.0. [URL]. [retrieved 4 May 2018]
Fox, Barbara
2010Introduction. In Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, pauses and placeholders, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Jean-Philippe
2011EasyAlign: An automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association . 27–31 August, Florence, Italy.
Hayashi, Makoto & Kyung-eun Yoon
2010A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: With particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. In Nino Amiridze, Boyd Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, pauses and placeholders, 33–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennecke, Inga & Wiltrud Mihatsch
(2022) From taxonomic to pragmatic uses of French genre: Degrees of prosodic prominence as indicators of pragmaticalization. In Hélène Vassiliadou & Marie Lammert (eds.), Clear versus approximate categorisation: A crosslinguistic perspective, 299–338. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Johnsen, Laure Anne & Mathieu Avanzi
2020Étude des contours prosodiques des listes ouvertes dans le corpus OFROM. Studia Linguistica Romanica 41. 110–128.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Cécile Fougeron
2000A phonological model of French intonation. In Antonis Botinis (ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology, 209–242. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, Georges
1994Nominales: Essais de sémantique référentielle. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter
1993Kyenbé-tyonbo: Wurzeln kreolischer Lexik. In Thomas Kotschi & Christian Foltys (eds.), Berliner romanistische Studien. Für Horst Ochse, 259–287. Berlin: Institut für Romanische Philologie der FU.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf
1990Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Lou, Katarina Bartkova, Mathilde Dargnat & Denis Jouvet
2018Prosodic and pragmatic values of discourse particles in French. In ExLing 2018: Proceedings of the 9th Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, 77–80. Athens: ExLing Society.Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
2006aKognitive Grundlagen lexikalischer Hierarchien untersucht am Beispiel des Französischen und Spanischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b Machin, truc, chose: La naissance de marqueurs pragmatiques. In Martina Drescher & Barbara Job (eds.), Les marqueurs discursifs dans les langues romanes: Approches théoriques et méthodologiques, 153–172. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010‘Wird man von Hustensaft wie so ne art bekifft?’ Approximationsmarker in romanischen Sprachen. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that: General extenders in English discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005And stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 37(11). 1845–1864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2016More than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a resource for the sequential organization of turns and actions. Journal of Pragmatics 1061. 148–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo, Julia Homann & Gero Kunter
2017Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics 53(1). 81–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podlesskaya, Vera
2010Parameters for typological variation of placeholders. In Nini Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, pauses and placeholders, 11–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustka, Elissa
2011Einführung in die Phonetik und Phonologie des Französischen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Secova, Maria
2014 “ Je sais et tout mais…”: Might the general extenders in European French be changing? Journal of French Language Studies 24(2). 281–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
2007Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 391. 483–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2006Abtönung. Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Welby, Pauline
2003The slaying of Lady Mondegreen, being a study of French tonal association and alignment and their role in speech segmentation. Ohio: Ohio State University PhD dissertation.
Wichmann, Anne
2011Grammaticalization and prosody. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 331–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar