Narrating and focalizing visually and visual-verbally in comics and
graphic novels
Literary narratology has rightly devoted much attention to
analysing the source(s) of verbal information about the story world, usually
discussed under the label “narration”, and to any agent(s) that present(s)
non-verbalized perspectives on it, usually discussed under the label
“focalization”. Assessing the identity of narrators and focalizers is crucial
for understanding what is going on in the story world. Which narrative agent is
in charge? Is the narration and/or focalization layered? If the latter, is there
any “colouring” by the higher-level narrative agent of anything said, thought,
or experienced by the lower-level agent? Is the information provided
trustworthy? Nuanced? Prejudiced? Narration and focalization have supra-medial
as well as medium-specific dimensions. Over the past years, the issue of how
these concepts function in the medium of comics, which combines visuals and
language, has begun to be systematically addressed. This paper aims to show how
the visual mode can, on its own or combined with the written-language mode,
signal the sources of narration, focalization, and joint
narration-and-focalization, as well as distinguish between different levels at
which these take place.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Narration and focalization in written fiction
- 3.Narration and focalization in comics: The “reciter” and the “monstrator”
- 4.Case studies
- 4.1Reciting-plus-monstrating by the fundamental narrator
- 4.2Monstrating sensory focalization
- 4.3Monstrating mental focalization
- 4.4Free visual focalization
- 5.Concluding remarks and further research
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
-
Sources of examples
References (50)
References
Abbott, Michael & Charles Forceville. 2011. Visual
representation of emotion in manga: loss of control is loss of
hands in Azumanga Daioh (vol.
4). Language and
Literature 20(2). 91–112.
Baetens, Jan & Hugo Frey. 2015. The
graphic novel: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bal, Mieke. 2017. Narratology:
Introduction to the theory of narrative (4th
ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Booth, Wayne C. 1983. The
rhetoric of fiction (2nd
ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Borkent, Mike. 2017. Mediated
characters: Multimodal viewpoint construction in
comics. Cognitive
Linguistics 28(3). 539–563.
Brinton, Laurel. 1980. Represented
perception: A study in narrative
style. Poetics 91. 363–381.
Chatman, Seymour. 1990. Coming
to terms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Cohn, Neil. 2021. Who
understands comics? Questioning the universality of visual language
comprehension. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Dancygier, Barbara. 2012. The
language of stories: A cognitive
approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Dubray, David & Jochen Laubrock. 2019. Deep
CNN-based speech balloon detection and segmentation for comic
books. In Proceedings
of the 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and
Recognition, 1237–1243. Sydney, Australia.
Forceville, Charles. 2005. Visual
representations of the Idealized Cognitive Model of anger
in the Asterix album La
Zizanie
. Journal of
Pragmatics 37(1). 69–88.
Forceville, Charles. 2013. Creative
visual duality in comics
balloons. In Tony Veale, Kurt Feyaerts & Charles Forceville (eds.), Creativity
and the agile mind: A multi-disciplinary exploration of a multi-faceted
phenomenon, 253–273. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual
and multimodal communication: Applying the Relevance
principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forceville, Charles. 2021. Multimodality. In Xu Wen & John R. Taylor (eds.), The
Routledge handbook of Cognitive
linguistics, 676–687. London: Routledge.
Forceville, Charles, Tony Veale & Kurt Feyaerts. 2010. Balloonics:
The visuals of balloons in
comics. In Joyce Goggin & Dan Hassler-Forest (eds.), The
rise and reason of comics and graphic literature: Critical essays on the
form, 56–73. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Groensteen, Thierry. 2013. Comics
and narration (transl. by Ann Miller). Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.
Herman, David. 2002. Story
logic: Problems and possibilities of
narrative. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Horstkotte, Silke & Nancy Pedri. 2011. Focalization
in graphic
narrative. Narrative 19(3). 330–357.
Jost, François. 2004. The
look: From film to novel. An essay in comparative
narratology. In Robert Stam & Alessandra Raengo (eds.), A
companion to literature and
film, 71–80. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading
images: The grammar of visual design (2nd
ed.). London: Routledge.
Kukkonen, Karin. 2013. Contemporary
comics storytelling. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
La Cour, Erin, Simon Grennan & Rik Spanjers. 2022. Introduction. In Erin la Cour, Simon Grennan & Rik Spanjers (eds.), Key
terms in comics
studies, 1–2. London: Palgrave.
Laubrock, Jochen, Sven Hohenstein & Matthias Kümmerer. 2018. Attention
to comics: Cognitive processing during the reading of graphic
literature. In Alexander Dunst, Jochen Laubrock & Janina Wildfeuer (eds.), Empirical
comics
research, 239–263. London: Routledge.
Laubrock, Jochen & Alexander Dunst. 2020. Computational
approaches to comics analysis. Topics in
Cognitive
Science 121. 274–310.
Mikkonen, Kai. 2008. Presenting
minds in graphic narratives. Partial
Answers 6(2). 301–321.
Mikkonen, Kai. 2017. The
narratology of comic
art. London: Routledge.
Ojha, Amitash, Charles Forceville & Bipin Indurkhya. 2021. An
experimental study on the effect of emotion lines in
comics. Semiotica: Journal of the
International Association for Semiotic
Studies 2431. 305–324.
Palmer, Alan. 2004. Fictional
minds. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. 2005. Contemporary
poetics (2nd
ed.). London: Routledge.
Ryan, Marie-Laure (ed.). 2004. Narrative
across media. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Shinohara, Kazuko & Yoshihiro Matsunaka. 2009. Pictorial metaphors of emotion in Japanese comics. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor, 265–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Smith, Murray. 1995. Engaging
characters: Fiction, emotion, and the
cinema. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance
theory: Communication and cognition (2nd
ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Thon, Jan-Noël. 2016. Transmedial
narratology and contemporary media
culture. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Van Duijn, Max J., Ineke Sluiter & Arie Verhagen. 2015. When
narrative takes over: The representation of embedded mindstates in
Shakespeare’s
Othello
. Language and
Literature 24(2). 148–166.
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2017. Viewpoint. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of Cognitive
linguistics, 157–171. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sources of examples
Example I (Figure
1). Watchmen, text
by Alan Moore and visuals
by Dave Gibbons. © DC comics 1986.
Example
II. Les Lauriers de
César, text by René Goscinny and
visuals by Albert Uderzo. © Dargaud 1972.
Examples III and
VI. Tintin et les
Picaros, by Hergé. ©
Casterman 1976.
Example IV (Figure
2). Soirs de Paris: Le
Martial, text by Philippe Avril and
visuals by François Petit-Roulet. © Humanoïdes Associés 1989.
Example V (Figure 3) and Example XVI
(Figure 13). À la Recherche du Temps Perdu: A l’Ombre
des Jeunes Filles en Fleurs, Volume
I, by Marcel Proust and Stéphane Heuet, © Guy Delcourt 2000.
Example VII (Figure
4). Jimmy Corrigan, the Smartest Kid on
Earth, by Chris Ware. © Pantheon 2000.
Example VIII (Figure 5) and Example
XI (Figure
8). Persepolis, by Marjane Satrapi, translated
by Anjali Singh. © Pantheon 2003.
Example IX (Figure
6). Goliath, by Tom Gauld. © Drawn & Quarterly 2012.
Example X (Figure 7) and Example XII
(Figure 9). Le Combat
Ordinaire (Volume I1), by Manu Larcenet. © Dargaud 2007
[2003].
Example XIII (Figure
10). Yotsubato, (vol.51), by Kiyohiko Azuma. © Media Works 2006.
Example XIV (Figure
11). Azumanga Daioh, The
Omnibus, by Kiyohiko Azuma. © AD Vision.
Example XV (Figure
12). Aline et les
Autres, by Guy Delisle. © L’Association 1999.
Example XVII (Figure
14). Prosopopus, by Nicholas de Crécy. © Dupuis 2009.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Weber, Valentin & Hugo Mercier
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.