Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 23:2 (2016) ► pp.209–237

Intentionality and Internal Models in artificial agents

Published online: 20 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.2.01bae
References (68)
Anderson, D.M.L. 2003. “Embodied cognition: A field guide”. Artificial Intelligence 149(1): 91–130.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.W. 2008. “Grounded cognition”. Annual Reviews Psychology 591: 617–645.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.W., Breazeal, C. and Smith, L.B. 2007. “Cognition as coordinated non-cognition”. Cognitive Processing 8(2): 79–91.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, W. 1988. Philosophy of Mind: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Blakemore, S.J., Rees, G. and Frith, C.D. 1998. “How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study”. Elsevier Science 36(6).Google Scholar
Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D. and Frith, C.D. 2000. “Why can’t you tickle yourself”. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 11(11).Google Scholar
Brentano, F. 1874. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R.M. 1984. “The primacy of the intentional”. Synthese 61(1): 89–109.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. 1998. “Embodiment and the philosophy of mind”. Current Issues in Philosophy of Mind 431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. 2010. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. and Damasio, H. 2006. “Minding the body”. ProQuest Agriculture Journals 3(135).Google Scholar
Dearden, A. and Demiris, Y. 2005. “Learning forward models for robots”. In Int. Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence . Edimburgh, 14401.
Dearden, A. 2008. Developmental Learning of Internal Models for Robotics. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
Demiris, Y. and Khadhouri, B. 2006. “Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition of actions. Robotics and autonomous systems”. The Social Mechanisms of Robot Programming from Demonstration 54(5): 361–369.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1896. The Metaphysical Assumptions of Materialism, Chapter the Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. Early Works 5 (EW. 5).Google Scholar
. 1922. The Metaphysical Assumptions of Materialism, chapter Human Nature and Conduct. Middle Works 14 (MW.14).Google Scholar
Di Paolo E.A., Murase, K. and Asakura, T. (eds). 2003. Organismically-Inspired Robotics: Homeostatic Adaptation and Teleology Beyond the Closed Sensorimotor Loop Dynamical Systems Approach to Embodiment and Sociality. Australia: Advanced Knowledge International, pp. 19–42.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 2000. Perception, Knowledge, and Belief: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H.L. 1979. What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 19721. New York: Harper & Row,Google Scholar
Escobar, E., Hermosillo, J. and Lara, B. 2012. “Self body mapping in mobile robots using vision and forward models”. Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A. 1975. The Language of Thought. Thomas Y. Crowell Co. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Froese, T. and Ziemke, T. 2009. “Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind”. Artificial Intelligence 173(3-4): 466–500.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaona, W., Hermosillo, J. and Lara, B. 2012. “Distance perception in mobile robots as an emergent consequence of visual-motor cycles using forward models”. Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.Google Scholar
Gentsch, A. and Schütz-Bosbach, S. 2011. “I did it: Unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature”. Cognitive Neuroscience 23(12): 3817–3828.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.J. 1950. The Perception of the Visual World. U.S.A: The Riverside Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 1990. “The symbol grounding problem”. Physica D 421: 335–346.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haruno, M., Wolpert, D.M. and Kawato, M. 2001. “Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control”. Neural Computation 131: 2201–2220.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1985. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. Being and Time (Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy). New York: University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. and Moeller, R. 2004. “Action selection and mental transformation based on a chain of forward models”. In Proceedings. of the 8th International. Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press, 213–222.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. 2007. “Perception through visuomotor anticipation in a mobile robot”. Neural Networks 201: 22–33.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 1983. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Vol. 21. Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Husserl, E., Sheehan, Thomas and Palmer, Richard E. (eds), 1997. Edmund Husserl: Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927-1931). Great Britain: Kluwer.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1897. The Will to Believe and Other Popular Essays in Popular Philosophy. Longmans Green and Co. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1904. A World of Pure Experience. Chapter 2. Longmans Green and Co. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jazé, J-P. 2012. “El rol del saber no-proposicional en la explicación de la acción”. Memorias del I Coloquio Internacional de Ciencias Cognitivas.Google Scholar
Jordan, M.I. and Rumelhart, D.E. 1992. “Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher”. Cognitive Science 161: 307–354.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiverstein, J. 2007. “Could a robot have a subjective point of view?” Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7).Google Scholar
Lara, B., Rendon, J.M. and Capistran, M.A. 2007. “Prediction of multi-modal sensory situations a for- ward model approach”. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Latin America Robotics Symposium , Vol. 11.
Metta, G., Sandini, G., Natale, L., Craighero, L. and Fadiga, L. 2006. “Understanding mirror neurons: a bio-robotic approach”. Interaction Studies 7: 2006.Google Scholar
Miall, R.C. and Wolpert, D.M. 1996. “Forward models for physiological motor control”. Neural Net-Works 9(8): 1265–1279.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeller, R. and Schenk, W. 2008. “Bootstrapping cognition from behavior— a computerized thought experiment”. Cognitive Science 32(3): 504–554.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. 1963. Computers and Thought, chapter GPS: A Program that Simulates Human Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
O´Regan, J.K., Myin, E. and Noë, A. 2005. “Sensory consciousness explained (better) in terms of ‘corporality’ and ‘alerting capacity’”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 41: 369–387.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C.S. 1877. “The fixation of belief”. Popular Science, 1–15.Google Scholar
. 1878. “How to make our ideas clear”. Popular Science, 286–302.Google Scholar
. 1998. “What pragmatism is”. In The Peirce Edition Project (ed.), The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2 (1893-1913). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 331–398.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L.W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M.H., McRae, K. and Spivey, M.J. 2011. “The mechanics of embodiment: A dialog on embodiment and computational modeling”. Frontiers in psychology 2(5).   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Can- didi, M., Dindo, H. and Barca, L. 2013. “Action simulation in the human brain: Twelve questions”. New Ideas in Psychology 31(3): 270–290.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, R. and Scheier, C. 1999. Understanding Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of `Meaning´. In Mind, language, and reality: Philosophical papers of Hilary Putnam, Vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, R.C. 1981. “Internal representations: Prologue to a theory of intentionality”. Philosophical Topics 12(1).   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. 1980. “Minds, brains, and programs”. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 417–457.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Intentionality An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Minds, Brains and Science (Lectures, Reith). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. London: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L.A. 2011. Embodied Cognition. (New problems of philosophy). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turing, A. 1950. “Computing machinery and intelligence”. Mind 591: 433–460.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, F.J. 1979. “Principles of biological autonomy”. New York, North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2002. “Six views of embodied cognition”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(4): 625–636.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. and Knoblich, G. 2005. “The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics”. Psycho- Logical Bulletin 1311: 460–473.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D.M., Miall, R.C. and Kawato, M. 1998. “Internal models in the cerebellum”. Elsevier Science 2(9).Google Scholar
Wolpert, D.M. and Ghahramani, Z. 2000. “Computational principles of movement neuroscience”. Nature Neuroscience 31: 1212–1217.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z. and Flanagan, J.R. 2001. “Perspectives and problems in motor learning”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(11): 487–494.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D.M., Doya, K. and Kawato, M. 2003. “A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 358(1431): 593–602.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziemke, T. 1999. Rethinking Grounding. Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. (Department of Computer Science). University of Skövde, 177–190.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lara, Bruno, Dadai Astorga, Emmanuel Mendoza-Bock, Manuel Pardo, Esaú Escobar & Alejandra Ciria
2018. Embodied Cognitive Robotics and the learning of sensorimotor schemes. Adaptive Behavior 26:5 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.