Article published in:
The Concept of Reference in the Cognitive SciencesEdited by Amichai Kronfeld and Lawrence D. Roberts
[Pragmatics & Cognition 6:1/2] 1998
► pp. 21–45
Quantity implicatures in reference understanding
Jeanette K. Gundel | University of Minnesota
Ann E. Mulkern | University of Minnesota
Gundel, Hedberg and Zacharski (1993) propose a framework whereby different referring forms conventionally signal different cognitive statuses on an implica-tional 'givenness hierarchy'. Interaction of the hierarchy with Grice's Maxim of Quantity gives rise to scalar implicatures which further constrain the choice among forms and their interpretations when necessary conditions for more than one form are met. Wilson (1992) and Matsui (1995) show that reference assignment for NPs introduced by the definite article is constrained within Relevance Theory by the automatic selection of an interpretation that yields adequate contextual effects for minimal processing effort. This paper proposes that an optimal account of how people understand the intended referent of an NP must appeal to both the Givenness Hierarchy and Relevance Theory. Such an account still requires the first part of the Quantity Maxim, however, either as a socially based assumption or as part of the Principle of Relevance itself
Published online: 01 January 1998
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.6.1-2.05gun
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.6.1-2.05gun
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Grisot, Cristina
Gundel, Jeanette K.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski
Khalfaoui, Amel
Kuo, Jenny Yi-chun
Scott, Kate
Scott, Kate
Swierzbin, Bonnie
Zulaica-Hernández, Iker & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.