Review published in:
The Concept of Reference in the Cognitive Sciences
Edited by Amichai Kronfeld and Lawrence D. Roberts
[Pragmatics & Cognition 6:1/2] 1998
► pp. 339348
References
Barwise, J. and Perry, J.
1983Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bertolet, R.
1980 “The semantic significance of Donnellan’s distinction”. Philosophical Studies 37(3): 281–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981a “Kripke’s speaker’s reference”. Analysis 41(2): 70–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981b “Referential uses and speaker meaning”. Philosophical Quarterly 31(124): 253–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986 “Donnellan’s distinctions”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64(4): 477–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990What is Said: A Theory of Indirect Speech Reports. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crimmins, M.
1994Talk About Beliefs. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Devitt, M.
1989 “Against direct reference”. In P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XIV1, 206–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Coming to Our Senses: A Naturalistic Program for Semantic Localism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donnellan, K.
1966 “Reference and definite descriptions”. Philosophical Review 751: 281–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, D.
1977 “Demonstratives”. In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press [1989], 481–563.Google Scholar
Perry, J.
1977 “Frege on demonstratives”. Philosophical Review 861: 474–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richard, M.
1990Propositional Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, N.
1982 “Assertion and incomplete definite descriptions”. Philosophical Studies 421: 37–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 “The Pragmatic fallacy”. Philosophical Studies 631: 83–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wettstein, H.
1981 “Demonstrative reference and definite descriptions”. [Reprinted in H. Wettstein (1991), 35–49]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983 “The semantic significance of the referential-attributive distinction”. [Reprinted in Wettstein (1991), 50–58]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake? And Other Essays. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar