Anca Gâţă
List of John Benjamins publications for which Anca Gâţă plays a role.
Journal
ISSN 2211-4742 | E-ISSN 2211-4750
2022 Review of Cronier & Deruelle (2019): Argumenter en guerre. Discours de guerre, sur la guerre et dans la guerre de l’Antiquité à nos jours Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:3, pp. 417–421 | Review
Developed within four French institutions, the research program “Argumenter en guerre” [Arguing at war time] investigated from 2012–2016 the “argumentative dynamics” of “war cultures”. One of its results is the collective volume, with the same umbrella title, consisting of an introductory essay… read more
2021 Characteristics of a detached argumentative style in public policy analysis: Text types as presentational choices Argumentative Style, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 46–72 | Article
This study is a contribution to the recently introduced notion of argumentative style (van Eemeren 2019) in the framework of the pragma-dialectical approach. It aims at characterizing a detached argumentative style, by focusing on a speech event pertaining to the communicative activity type… read more
2017 Chapter 17. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peng Wu (eds.), pp. 309–334 | Chapter
2017 Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2, pp. 137–166 | Article
In the framework of the extended pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting is approached in this study as a particular communicative activity type, which can be reconstructed as part of a critical discussion. CSR reports excerpts are viewed in… read more
2015 The strategic function of argumentative moves in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 297–312 | Article
A CSR report may be viewed as part of a virtual critical discussion in which the company acts as a protagonist claiming that their behaviour is responsible towards society. Social actors may be represented as virtual antagonists in the critical discussion who (virtually) doubt or critique this… read more
2011 Maneuvering strategically with dissociation in a political interview Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Feteris, Eveline T., Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), pp. 5–20 | Article