Frans H. van Eemeren

List of John Benjamins publications for which Frans H. van Eemeren plays a role.

Journal

Book series

Titles

Argumentative Style: A pragma-dialectical study of functional variety in argumentative discourse

Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Sara Greco, Ton van Haaften, Nanon Labrie, Fernando Leal and Peng Wu

[Argumentation in Context, 20] 2022. x, 332 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics

Argumentative Style

Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren

Special issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 (2021) v, 143 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics

Argumentation between Doctors and Patients: Understanding clinical argumentative discourse

Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie

[Not in series, 235] 2021. x, 155 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics

Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context

Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen

[Argumentation in Context, 17] 2019. xiv, 336 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics

Context-dependency of Argumentative Patterns

Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren

Special issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1 (2017) v, 104 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics

Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics

Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peng Wu

[Argumentation in Context, 12] 2017. ix, 367 pp.
Subjects Applied linguistics | Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics

Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice

Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen

[Argumentation in Context, 9] 2015. ix, 343 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics

Exploring Argumentative Contexts

Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen

[Argumentation in Context, 4] 2012. xx, 398 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics
Subjects Communication Studies | Dialogue studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics

Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory

Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen

[Controversies, 6] 2008. xiii, 278 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics | Sociolinguistics and Dialectology

Argumentation in Practice

Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser

[Controversies, 2] 2005. viii, 368 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics

Articles

There is much more to argumentative style than just the well-known presentational (“linguistic”) dimension. Equally important dimensions of the argumentative styles utilised in resolving a difference of opinion are the topical dimension of the selection of the standpoints, starting points,… read more | Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst 2022 Argumentation theoryHandbook of Pragmatics: Manual, Verschueren, Jef and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), pp. 82–90
Chapter
Eemeren, Frans H. van 2021 Examining argumentative style: A new theoretical perspectiveArgumentative Style, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 8–25
In this theoretical expose, it is argued that the notion of argumentative style is more encompassing and at the same time more specific than the more familiar notion of linguistic style. According to van Eemeren, argumentative styles always have three dimensions: the selection of standpoints,… read more | Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van 2021 Six related essays on argumentative styleArgumentative Style, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 1–7
This introduction to the special issue devoted to argumentative style describes the way in which this collection of six papers came about. It recapitulates the main thrust of the issues that are included. All authors share the pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentative style set forth in the… read more | Introduction
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen 2019 Chapter 1. A collection of studies of argumentation in practiceArgumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 1–12
Chapter
Chapter
Commentary
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Chapter
Eemeren, Frans H. van 2017 Context-dependency of argumentative patterns in discourseContext-dependency of Argumentative Patterns, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 3–26
This introductory article concludes the examination of prototypical argumentative patterns manifesting themselves in communicative activity types in the political, legal and medical domain reported in this special issue of the Journal of Argumentation in Context (JAIC) and an earlier special issue… read more | Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van 2017 Chapter 8. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse in political deliberationContextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peng Wu (eds.), pp. 123–144
Chapter
Chapter
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peng Wu 2017 Chapter 1. Introduction Contextualizing Pragma-DialecticsContextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peng Wu (eds.), pp. 1–10
Chapter
Eemeren, Frans H. van 2015 Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberationArgumentation in Political Deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 11–31
In this essay, first the pragma-dialectical theory of strategic maneuvering is explained. Then the focus is on the conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types and the institutional constraints it imposes on strategic maneuvering. Thus, an adequate background is… read more | Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels 2015 The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threatsScrutinizing Argumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 313–326
Ad baculum threats can be seen as a mode of strategic maneuvering which takes on a reasonable appearance in real life situations when it mimics, legitimate pragmatic argumentation. In this paper the hypothesis was tested that ad baculum fallacies are seen as less unreasonable than clear cases when… read more | Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van 2013 Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberationArgumentation in political deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 10–31
In this essay, first the pragma-dialectical theory of strategic maneuvering is explained. Then the focus is on the conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types and the institutional constraints it imposes on strategic maneuvering. Thus, an adequate background is… read more | Article
The room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse depends not only on the dialectical and rhetorical preconditions inherent in strategic maneuvering but also on various kinds of extrinsic preconditions imposed on strategic maneuvering by the institutional macro-context of the… read more | Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen 2012 IntroductionExploring Argumentative Contexts, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. xiii–xx
Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen 2009 Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourseDiscourse, of Course: An overview of research in discourse studies, Renkema, Jan (ed.), pp. 171–184
Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser 2009 Strategic maneuvering: Examining argumentation in contextExamining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 1–24
Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen 2008 Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourseControversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 1–26
Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser 2008 Rhetoric in a dialectical framework: Fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvringDialogue and Rhetoric, Weigand, Edda (ed.), pp. 133–151
The fallacies are one of the most significant research topics in the study of argumentation. After Hamblin (1970) revealed the inadequacy of the dominant Logical Standard Treatment of the fallacies, several kinds of alternative treatments have been developed. The “pragma-dialectical” alternative… read more | Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels 2008 Reasonableness in confrontation: Empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallaciesControversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 181–195
Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser 2007 The study of argumentation as normative pragmaticsPragmatic Interfaces, Saussure, Louis de and Peter J. Schulz (eds.), pp. 161–177
In the study of argumentation there is a sharp and ideological separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches, which needs to be remedied. The authors show how the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation can be instrumental in bridging the gap. By adopting a research programme that… read more | Article
Eemeren, Frans H. van 2005 Foreword: Preview by reviewManipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, language, mind, Saussure, Louis de and Peter J. Schulz (eds.), pp. ix–xvi
Miscellaneous
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser 2005 IntroductionArgumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser (eds.), pp. 1–7
Miscellaneous
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels 2005 22. The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectal freedom ruleArgumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser (eds.), pp. 349–365
Chapter
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst 1995 Argumentation theoryHandbook of Pragmatics: Manual, Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Östman and Jan Blommaert † (eds.), pp. 55–61
Article
Article