A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase
Edited by Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin and Ion Giurgea
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 207] 2013. xxviii, 900 pp.
Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin
List of John Benjamins publications for which Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin plays a role.
Title
Subjects Generative linguistics | Romance linguistics | Syntax
2016 Why are distributive readings dispreferred? Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon, Carrilho, Ernestina, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira (eds.), pp. 83–102 | Article
The paper reports the results of four experiments that were meant to investigate the availability of distributive readings in three types of French sentences, which involved singular indefinite DPs in the object position but differed with respect to the syntax of the subject DP (def-plDP, groupDP,… read more
2013 Chapter 11. Deverbal nouns A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase, Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen and Ion Giurgea (eds.), pp. 663–718 | Article
2013 Chapter 2. Bare nouns A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase, Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen and Ion Giurgea (eds.), pp. 49–96 | Article
2013 Chapter 1. Introduction: Nominal features and nominal projections A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase, Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen and Ion Giurgea (eds.), pp. 1–48 | Article
2013 Chapter 6. Genitive DPs and pronominal possessors A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase, Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen and Ion Giurgea (eds.), pp. 309–354 | Article
2013 Nominal and pronominal possessors
in Romanian The Genitive, Carlier, Anne and Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds.), pp. 105–140 | Article
We describe the syntax and morphology of the genitival construction of Romanian, and we insist on the syntactic analysis of some peculiar properties of these constructions: the alternation between genitives introduced by the agreeing particle al and those without al, the status of this agreeing… read more
2013 Chapter 8. Adnominal prepositional phrases A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase, Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen and Ion Giurgea (eds.), pp. 531–564 | Article
2013 Chapter 12. Proper names A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase, Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen and Ion Giurgea (eds.), pp. 719–746 | Article
2011 The agreement of collective DPS in Romanian Romance Linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the 40th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Seattle, Washington, March 2010, Herschensohn, Julia (ed.), pp. 239–256 | Article
Romanian collective nouns do not allow plural agreement on the verb, unlike in British English. But when a collective noun is used with a partitive quantifier (e.g. o parte din guvern “part of the government”), plural agreement is possible. We propose an analysis for partitive quantification, which… read more
2010 Implicit agentivity without agents in the syntax: A crosslinguistic analysis of SE-verbs Edges, Heads, and Projections: Interface properties, Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Virginia Hill (eds.), pp. 47–66 | Article
This paper defends a unified characterization of se-verbs and argues that the passive and middle readings are contextually triggered. The analysis points out that the derivations of agents is independent of the edge properties of ‘little’ v, and thus deviates from Raposo & Uriagereka (1996). The… read more
2010 Generic bare singulars in Brazilian Portuguese Romance Linguistics 2008: Interactions in Romance, Arregi, Karlos, Zsuzsanna Fagyal, Silvina Montrul and Annie Tremblay (eds.), pp. 203–216 | Article
The analysis of the generic readings of Bare Singulars in Brazilian Portuguese is controversial: for Munn & Schmitt (1999, 2005) and Schmitt & Munn (2002) generic Bare Singulars are names of kinds, whereas for Müller (2002) they are indefinites bound by a generic operator. This paper provides two… read more
2008 10. Clitic doubling, complex heads and interarboreal operations Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages, Kallulli, Dalina and Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), pp. 289–319 | Article
Romanian, as well as certain varieties of Spanish (but not Iberian Spanish, French or Italian) allow the clitic doubling of direct objects (indirect objects will be left out here),1 a phenomenon that is subject to clear crosslinguistic differences: in Spanish, but not in Romanian, clitic doubling… read more
2006 Bare nouns, number and types of incorporation Non-definiteness and Plurality, Vogeleer, Svetlana and Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), pp. 51–79 | Article
2003 3. From DPs to NPs: A Bare Phrase Structure account of genitives From NP to DP: Volume 2: The expression of possession in noun phrases, Coene, Martine and Yves D’hulst (eds.), pp. 75–120 | Article
1995 Clitic Clusters in Rumanian: Deriving Linear Order from Hierachical Structure Advances in Roumanian Linguistics, Cinque, Guglielmo and Giuliana Giusti (eds.), pp. 55–82 | Article
1985 Redoublement Clitique, Relatives et Interrogatives en Roumain et Espagnol Lingvisticæ Investigationes 9:2, pp. 269–306 | Article
This article shows that important differences between Romanian and Spanish with respect to the clitic doubling phenomenon are not due to a parametric variation in the clitic systems of the two languages, but to a specific mechanism of relative clause formation that we propose for Romanian. Our… read more
1982 Review of Van Der Auwera (1980): The semantics of determiners Lingvisticæ Investigationes 6:2, pp. 407–419 | Review