Elisabet Tiselius

Elisabet Tiselius

ORCID iD
orcid.org/0000-0002-2285-6729

is author/editor of the following title:

image not available
Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative approaches in Translation Studies
Edited by Cecilia Alvstad, Adelina Hild and Elisabet Tiselius
[Benjamins Translation Library, 94]  2011.  xii, 377 pp.

is author of the following articles:

image not available
Skaten, Ingeborg, Gro Hege Saltnes Urdal and Elisabet Tiselius.  “Exploring deaf sign language interpreting students’ experiences from joint sign language interpreting programs for deaf and hearing students in Finland”. In Translation and Interpreting Studies: Online-First Articles,
image not available
Tiselius, Elisabet and Birgitta Englund Dimitrova. 2019. “Asymmetrical language proficiency in dialogue interpreters”. Translation, Cognition & Behavior  2:2, 305–322
image not available
Tiselius, Elisabet and Michaela Albl-Mikasa. 2019. “Introduction”. Translation, Cognition & Behavior  2:2, 233–239
image not available
Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta and Elisabet Tiselius. 2016. “Cognitive aspects of community interpreting. Toward a process model”. In Reembedding Translation Process Research, 195–214
image not available
Alvstad, Cecilia, Adelina Hild and Elisabet Tiselius. 2011. “Methods and strategies of process research”. In Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative approaches in Translation Studies, 1–9
image not available
Tiselius, Elisabet. 2011. ““This led me to start thinking about how this happened, and what the process behind it would be””. In Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative approaches in Translation Studies, 345–359
image not available
Tiselius, Elisabet and Gard B. Jenset. 2011. “Process and product in simultaneous interpreting”. In Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative approaches in Translation Studies, 269–300
image not available
Tiselius, Elisabet. 2009. “Revisiting Carroll's scales”. In Testing and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies: A call for dialogue between research and practice, 95–121