Le Cheng
List of John Benjamins publications for which Le Cheng plays a role.
Journal
Setting boundaries between crime and rights: Discursive (de)legitimation of abortion rights in the U.S. Supreme Court Dobbs opinions Narrative Boundaries: Constitutional struggles in an age of polarization, Cordero, Rodrigo and Raimundo Frei (eds.), pp. 653–676 | Article
2024 In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson overturned two precedents, thus ending American women’s 50-year-old constitutional right to abortion. Drawing on Van Leeuwen’s legitimation framework and Labov’s model of narrative structure, this study focuses on how justices… read more
2023
2023
2022
Development of deontic modality in Chinese civil laws: A corpus study Pragmatics and Society 11:3, pp. 337–362 | Article
2020 In legislative texts, deontic modality helps define rights, privileges, obligations, and responsibilities. Based on a corpus of Chinese civil laws from 1949 to 2015, the study investigates the development of deontic modality in Chinese civil legislative discourse and examines the variations of… read more
Mapping terminological variation and ideology in data protection laws Terminology 26:2, pp. 159–183 | Article
2020 This study aims to deal with the relationship between terminological variation and ideology by examining the system of terminology and the defined individual terms in data protection legislation. With two self-compiled corpora incorporating data protection laws in the United States and the… read more
2019
Terminology evolution and legal development: A case study of Chinese legal terminology Terminology 16:2, pp. 159–180 | Article
2010 The present study deals with the relationship between terminology evolution and legal development. Altogether 100 Chinese legal terms are randomly collected from Chinese statutes in order to examine the legal development in China from 1912 to the present. The results demonstrate that terminology… read more
A court judgment as dialogue Dialogue and Rhetoric, Weigand, Edda (ed.), pp. 267–281 | Article
2008 Dialogue is of cardinal importance in maintaining the interpersonal relationship between judges and facilitating judgment drafting as collaborative problem solving. It is also important for the check and balance between courts and the legislature. A court judgment can therefore be taken as a… read more