Cover not available
Article published In:
Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 1:2 (2020) ► pp.184–210

German discourse particles in the second language classroom

Teasing apart learning problems at the syntax-pragmatics interface

ORCID logo | Universität Konstanz | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
ORCID logo | Università di Trento
ORCID logo | Università di Trento
One of the main pedagogical objectives for language learners at high proficiency levels is to use ‘cohesive devices’ when writing a text or conducting a conversation. Usually, curricula stress the importance of clause-internal cohesion (by means such as connectives: and, but, when, because, etc.). By contrast, we stress the importance of cohesion at the level of the dialogue and in this context focus on discourse (aka ‘modal’) particles as a means to yield cohesion at that level. In this domain, German discourse particles represent a challenging learning objective for second language learners of German. This paper explores some production patterns of German discourse particles in L2 German by L1 Italian learners. We show that looking at those elements can provide new insights because these elements allow us to tease apart problems within syntax as compared to the lexicon-pragmatics interface in second language learning.
Keywords: discourse particles, German, Italian, modal particles, second language classroom
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous work on discourse particles in a second language
  • 3.Italian particles and constructional alternatives
  • 4.Testing grammaticality vs. felicity of German particles in L1 Italian learners
    • 4.1Method and participants
    • 4.2Results
      • Coding of participants’ production data
      • Results
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions and pedagogical implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.20008.tro
References (36)
References
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2010). Pragmatics and second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The handbook of applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 232–243). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2020). Pedagogical linguistics: A view from L2 pragmatics. Pedagogical Linguistics, 11, 44–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, J., & Obenauer, H.-G. (2011). Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review, 281, 449–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, J., & Trotzke, A. (2015). The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles. In J. Bayer, R. Hinterhölzl & A. Trotzke (Eds.), Discourse-oriented syntax (pp. 13–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belz, J., Vyatkina, N. A. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 621, 17–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bidese, E., Casalicchio, J., Moroni, M. C., & Parenti, A. (2019). The expression of additivity in the Alps: German auch, Italian anche and their counterparts in Gerdenese Ladin. In E. Bidese, J. Casalicchio & M. C. Moroni (Eds.), Linguistic views from the Alps. La linguistica vista dalle Alpi (pp. 341–372). Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (2011). German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review, 281, 493–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). What do you do if you don’t have modal particles? In E. Brandner, A. Czypionka, C. Freitag & A. Trotzke (Eds.), Webschrift for Josef Bayer (pp. 16–21). [URL], accessed December 2019.
Cognola, F., & Schifano, N. (2018). On the marking of negative presupposition in regional varieties of Italian. In G. Pană Dindelegan, A. Dragomirescu, I. Nicula & A. Nicolae (Eds.), Comparative and diachronic perspectives on Romance syntax (pp. 433–453). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Coniglio, M. (2008). Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 181, 91–129.Google Scholar
(2011). Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniels, A., Köhl-Kuhn, R., Mautsch, K., Sander, I., & Tremp Soares, H. (2012). Mittelpunkt neu B2: Deutsch als Fremdsprache für Fortgeschrittene. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Dohi, A. (2018). La particella pa nelle varietà del ladino dolomitico con particolare attenzione al fassano. Doctoral dissertation. University of Trento and Tokyo University of foreign studies.Google Scholar
Durrell, M. [1971] (2011). Hammer’s German grammar and usage: 5th edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foster, W., Christensen, P., & Fox, A. (2013). German all-in-one for dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Grosz, P. (2016). Information structure and discourse particles. In C. Fery & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 336–358). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hogeweg, L., de Hoop, H., Ramachers, S., van der Silk, F., & Wottrich, V. (2016). The L2-acquisition of the German particle doch . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 541, 201–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katelhön, P. (2008). Kleine Wörter: Abtönung und Modalpartikeln. In M. Nied Curcio (Ed.), Ausgewählte Phänomene zur kontrastiven Linguistik Italienisch-Deutsch. (pp. 212–254). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Bianchi, G., & Stangen, I. (2012). The HABLA-corpus (German-French and German- Italian). In T. Schmidt & K. Wörner (Eds.), Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis (pp. 163–179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 251, 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonini, C. (2002). Problemi di acquisizione del Tedesco L2 da parte di parlanti con L1 italiana: la posizione di V. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia. Università di Siena XXIII1, 197–232.Google Scholar
Magliacane, A., & Howard, M. (2019). The role of learner status in the acquisition of pragmatic markers during study abroad: The use of ‘like’ in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics, 1461, 72–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moroni, M. C. (2010). Modalpartikeln zwischen Syntax, Prosodie und Informationsstruktur. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Köpcke, K.-M. (2008). A prototype approach to sentences and sentence types. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 61, 83–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rankin, T. (2013). Verb movement in generative SLA and the teaching of word order patterns. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 57–76). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rost-Roth, M. (1999). Der (Nicht-)Erwerb der Modalpartikeln. Eine Fallstudie zum Partikelerwerb einer italienischen Deutschlernerin im Vergleich mit anderen Lernervarietäten. In N. Dittmar & A. Ramat (Eds.), Grammatica e discorso. Studi sull’acquisizione dell’italiano e del tedesco (pp. 165–209). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2016). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, V. (2016). Italian mica and its use in discourse: An interactional account. Journal of Pragmatics, 1031, 49–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 41, 91–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurmair, M. (1989). Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, A. (2018). DP-internal modal particles: A case study of German ja . Studia Linguistica, 721, 322–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viesel, Y. (2015). Discourse structure and syntactic embedding: The German discourse particle ja . Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam Colloquium, 418–427.Google Scholar
Waltereit, R. (2006). Abtönung. Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weydt, H. (1981). Partikeln im Deutschunterricht. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M. (2011). Discourse particles. In P. Portner, C. Maienborn & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (pp. 2011–2038). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Reimer, Laura
2023. The modal particle elicitation test. Pedagogical Linguistics 4:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.