Cover not available
Article published In:
Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 5:1 (2024) ► pp.76–101

The efficacy of lexical stress diacritics on the English comprehensibility and accentedness of Korean speakers

ORCID logo | Byeongjeom Middle School
| University of Victoria
The purpose of the study was to examine the efficacy of lexical stress diacritics on the English comprehensibility and accentedness of Korean speakers. To this end, 30 native Korean participants read aloud 15 English sentences without diacritics in the pretest. Then, they were given explicit instructions on the production of higher pitch and extended duration as a marker of English stress with musical notation provided. In the posttest, the participants read aloud the same sentences as were in the pretest but which had diacritics indicating stress placement. In the delayed posttest, two days after the pretest and the posttest, the participants read 15 sentences without diacritics again to see if the effects of the treatment were retained. Randomized speech samples were rated by three native speakers of English in relation to comprehensibility and accentedness. Findings showed that significant improvements were observed after the treatment in both comprehensibility and accentedness.
Keywords: accentedness, comprehensibility, lexical stress, Korean speakers, Pronunciation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness
    • 1.2Prosodic differences in English and Korean
    • 1.3Enhanced input and English orthography
  • 2.The current study
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2English sentence reading materials
    • 2.3Pretest
    • 2.4Treatment instructions
    • 2.5Posttest
    • 2.6Delayed posttest
    • 2.7Rating procedures
  • 3.Results & discussion
    • 3.1Inter-rater reliability
    • 3.2Comprehensibility
    • 3.3Accentedness
    • 3.4Summary of results
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Future directions
      • 4.1.1Necessity of control group?
      • 4.1.2Inter-rater reliability
    • 4.2Retention of the effects of the treatment
    • 4.3Practical implications
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 29 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.22001.kim
References (56)
References
Abercrombie, D. (1949). Teaching Pronunciation. ELT Journal, 3 (5), 113–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archibald, J., O’Brien, M. G., & Sewell, A. (2021). Editorial: L2 Phonology Meets L2 Pronunciation. Frontiers in Communication, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.45. Retrieved from [URL]
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. M. (with Griner, B.). (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14 (1), 113–121.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (2015). Lexical stress in English pronunciation. In Reed, M., & Levis, J. (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 106–124). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language, 21, 133–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K. (1983). Visual feedback of intonation I: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. Language and Speech, 26 (4), 331–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning, 13 (1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness”. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 110 (3), 1606–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106 (2), 682–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36 (2), 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39 (3), 399–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97 (5), 3125–3134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, J., Holtby, A., & Derwing, T. (2011). Survey of the teaching of pronunciation in adult ESL programs in Canada, 2010. TESL Canada Journal, 29 (1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1 (2), 126–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (2), 214–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27 (4), 503–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (2), 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Heuven, V. J. (2008). Making sense of strange sounds: (mutual) intelligibility of related language varieties. A review. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2 (1–2), 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, S. (1995). A phonetic study of stress in Korean. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98 (5), 2893–2893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody: Intonational phonology and prosodic structure. New York, NY: Garland Pub.Google Scholar
(1998). The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15 (2), 189–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Korean intonational phonology and prosodic transcription. In S.-A. Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 201–229). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.-S., & Han, J.-I. (1998). Vowel length in modern Korean: An acoustic analysis. In B.-S. Park & J. H. Yoon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Korean linguistics (pp. 412–418). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38 (2), 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. (2019). The efficacy of lexical stress diacritics in the English comprehensibility and accentedness of Korean speakers [Master’s thesis, University of Victoria], UVicSpace.
Lee, J.-A. (2001). Korean speakers. In M. Swan & B. Smith (Eds.), Learner English: A Teacher’s Guide to Interference and Other Problems (2nd ed.) (pp. 325–342). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., & Huang, H. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: a meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30 (3), 307–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2006). Pronunciation and the assessment of spoken language. In R. Hughes (Ed.), Spoken English, TESOL and applied linguistics: Challenges for theory and practice (pp. 245–270). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M., Sonsaat, S., Link, S., & Barriuso, T. A. (2016). Native and nonnative teachers of L2 pronunciation: Effects on learner performance. TESOL Quarterly, 50 (4), 894–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M., & Levis, G. M. (2018). Teaching High-Value Pronunciation Features: Contrastive Stress for Intermediate Learners. CATESOL Journal, 30 (1), 139–160.Google Scholar
Lima, E. F. (2020). The Supra Tutor: Improving speaker comprehensibility through a fully online pronunciation course. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6 (1), 39–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, C., Wang, M., Idsardi, W., & Xu, Y. (2014). Stress processing in mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Bilingualism-Language and Cognition, 17 (2), 316–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leustek, J. (2017). Demand Characteristics. In Allen, M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 371–373). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (2015). The national curriculum of English, Seoul: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45 (1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49 1(supplement 1), 285–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. (2008). Foreign accent and speech intelligibility. In Edwards, J. G. H., & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.) Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 193–218), Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). Intelligibility in research and practice: teaching priorities. In: Reed, M., & Levis, J. (Eds.) The handbook of English pronunciation (377–396). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. L., & Kang, S. Y. (2015). Pronunciation and world Englishes. In Reed, M., & Levis, J. (Eds.) The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 320–329). Malden, MA; Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norouzian, R. & Plonsky, L. (2018). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34 (2), 257–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, & Saito, K. (2017). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research: LTR, 21 (5), 589–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32), New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. (2005). Automaticity in Bilingualism and Second Language Learning. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371–388). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Setter, J., & Jenkins, J. (2005). Pronunciation: State-of-the-art review article. Language Teaching, 38 (1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sicola, L. and Darcy, I. (2015). Integrating pronunciation into the language classroom. In Reed, M., & Levis, J. (Eds.) The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 471–487). Malden, MA; Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. S. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2 (2), 159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. (2015). Pronunciation in EFL instruction: A research-based approach. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36 (3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timming, A. R. (2017). The effect of foreign accent on employability: A study of the aural dimensions of aesthetic labour in customer-facing and non-customer-facing jobs. Work, Employment & Society, 31 (3), 409–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism-Language and Cognition, 15 (4), 905–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zatorre, & Baum, S. R. (2012). Musical melody and speech intonation: singing a different tune. PLoS Biology, 10 (7), e1001372–e1001372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar