Cover not available
Article published In:
Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2023) ► pp.228–263

Role-play and dialogic meta-pragmatics in developing and assessing pragmatic competence

ORCID logo | Simon Fraser University
| Trinity Western University
Role-play as a bridging and integrating practice in language teaching and development of pragmatic competence in learners is well-established. In an EAP classroom (Van Dyke & Acton, 2021) explored the impact of one fluency protocol, Cooperative Attending Skills Training, by which students were trained to listen attentively to shared personal stories, working toward more sophisticated strategies of conversational interaction. That system included dialogic, pragmatics-focused, spontaneous analysis and instructor-student discussion of interactional discourse features. With that experience, further modeling and conceptual input, participants in this study engaged in six role-plays, each involving a problem requiring pragmatic accommodation. The data from transcribed role-plays were analyzed in terms of pragmatic discourse functions and NVivo-based thematic threads. The generally successful application of the targeted skills and concepts by course end most likely resulted from the engaging meta-pragmatic interactions preceding the role-plays, and the formal and informal instructor feedback related to implicature, prosody, implicit understandings, direct conversation strategies, grammar, and vocabulary.
Keywords: role-play, pragmatic competence, dialogic meta-pragmatic awareness, pragmatic performance and assessment, pragmatics rubric
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Interactional and pragmatic competence – from CAST to Role-play
    • 2.2Use of role-play in assessing pragmatic competence
    • 2.3Studies in prosody and pragmatic competence
    • 2.4Pragmatic development in study abroad contexts and individual differences
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants (Appendix A)
    • 4.2Role-play rubric ramp-up
    • 4.3Data collection
    • 4.4Data analysis
      • 4.4.1NVivo12
      • 4.4.2Functional and Conversational Analysis of Role-play Excerpts
      • 4.4.3Prosodic analysis excerpts and individual differences
      • 4.4.4Course-based role-play assessment
  • 5.Analysis and results
    • 5.1Categories of participant interactions
    • 5.2Categories of teacher feedback on role-plays
    • 5.3Student performance on pragmatic awareness, role-play test and course grades
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 8 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.22004.van
References (67)
References
Acton & Cope, C. (1999). Cooperative Attending Skills Training, in Kluge, D., McGuire, S., Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (Eds). Co-operative Learning. JALT Applied Materials, Tokyo: JALT, 50–66.Google Scholar
Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2018). Proficiency and preference organization in second language refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 129 1, 140–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2015). Designing instructional effect studies for L2 pragmatics: A guide for teachers and researchers. In S. Gesuato, F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds.), Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices (pp. 135–164). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2018). Matching modality in L2 pragmatics research design. System (Linköping), 75 1, 13–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8 1, 347–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, N. D. (2005). Exploring L2 language play as an aid to SLL: A case study of humor in NS–NNS interaction. Applied Linguistics, 26 1, 192–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beltrán-Palanques, V. (2020). Towards a learner-centred approach to design role-play instruments for ILP studies: A Study Based on Complaints. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 28 1, 121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.11). [URL]
Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, K., & Tyler, J. C. (2018). Accents, not just prosodic boundaries, influence syntactic attachment. Language and Speech, 61 (2), 246–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Can I help you? The use of rise and rise-fall tones in the Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10 (1), 85–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Andrew D. (2020). Considerations in assessing pragmatic appropriateness in spoken language. Language Teaching, (53), 183–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, C. E. (2005). Learning the discourse of friendship. In A. E. Tyler, M. Takada, Y. Kim, & D. Marinova (Eds.), Language in use: Cognitive and discourse perspectives on language and language learning, (pp. 85–99). Washington, DC: George- town University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In M. H. Long & C. H. Doughty (eds.) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 312–348). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Skill Acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.) Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 94–112. Routledge.Google Scholar
De Marco, A. & Paone, E. (2015). The acquisition of emotional competence in L2 learners of Italian through specific instructional training. In: Gesuato, S., Bianchi, F., & Cheng, W. (Eds.). (2015). Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices, (pp. 441–468).Google Scholar
de Moraes, J. A. & Rilliard, A. (2016). Prosody and emotion in Brazilian Portuguese. In M. E. Armstrong, N. Henriksen, & V. M. D. Mar (Eds.). Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches Across Linguistic Subfields (pp. 135–152). John Benjamins Publishing Co.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C., and A. D. Cohen. (2012). Teaching Pragmatics in the Foreign Language Classroom: Grammar as a Communicative Resource. Hispania 95 (4), 650–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. & Mugford, G. (2017). (Im)politeness: Learning and Teaching. In: Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., Kádár, D. (Eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, (pp. 489–516). Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2018a). Role plays. In A. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics, (pp. 305–331). Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2019). Speech Acts in Interaction: Negotiating Joint Action in a Second Language. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics, (pp. 17–30).Google Scholar
Filipi, A. & Barraja-Rohan, A. (2015). An Interaction-Focused Pedagogy based on Conversation Analysis for Developing L2 Pragmatic Competence. In: Gesuato, S., Bianchi, F., & Cheng, W. (Eds.). (2015). Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices, (pp. 231–251).Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & W. L. M. Chang. 2015. Understanding Im/politeness Across Cultures: An Interactional Approach to Raising Sociopragmatic Awareness. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53 (4), 389–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hassal, T. (2015). Individual variation in L2 study abroad outcomes: A case study from Indonesian pragmatics. Multilingua, 34 1, 33–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heron, M. & Webster, J. (2019). Scaffolding talk in EAP lessons: an examination of experienced teachers’ practices. Innovation in Language Learning, 13(4), 358–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, N. & Cohen, A.D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, N. (2011). Learning L2 Japanese ‘politeness’ and ‘impoliteness’: Young American men’s dilemmas during study abroad. Japanese Language and Literature 45 1, 67–106.Google Scholar
Kang, O. & Kermod, A. (2019). Prosody in L2 Pragmatic Research. In: Taguchi, N. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kelley, C. & J. Meyers. (1995). Cross-cultural adaptability inventory manual. Arlington, VA: Vangent.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2022). The Competition Model: Past and Future. In: Gervain, J., Csibra, G., Kovács, K. (Eds.). A Life in Cognition. Language, Cognition, and Mind, Vol 111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maher, K. (2013). Neuroplasticity in the SLA classroom: Connecting brain research to language learning. JALT 2012 ConferenceGoogle Scholar
Maibodi, A. H. & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2015). The impact of individual differences on the interlanguage pragmatics of Iranian EFL learners in institutional discourse. Issues in Language Teaching, 4 (1), 99–129.Google Scholar
Mi, Q., Wang, C., Camerer, C. F., & Zhu, L. (2021). Reading between the lines: Listener’s vmPFC simulates speaker cooperative choices in communication games. Science Advances, 7 (10), 6276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L., Oliveri, B. & Smart, A. J. (2009). Semantics vs. world knowledge in prefrontal cortex. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (9), 1313–1334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portes, C., Beyssade, C., Michelas, A., Marandin, J.-M., & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2014). The dialogical dimension of intonational meaning: Evidence from French. Journal of Pragmatics, 74 1(Dec), 15–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C. & Kasper, G. (2018). Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 351, 331–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2006) Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of Human Society (pp. 70–96). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, K. P. (2018). Methods and ethics of data collection. In: A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider & W. Bublitz (Eds.). Methods in Pragmatics, (pp. 37–93). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2012). What kind of interaction receives high and low ratings in oral proficiency interviews? English Profile Journal, 3 1, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. & Lightbown, P. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19 1, 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shively, R. L. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 1, 1818–1835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Learning to be funning Spanish during study abroad: L2 humor development. The Modern Language Journal, 97 (1), 930–946. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011). Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act production? Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 491, 265–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2015). Working Memory and Second Language Performance: A Commentary. In Z. Wen, M. Borges Mota & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing (pp. 189–202). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Nakata, T. & DeKeyser, R. (2019). Optimizing second language practice in the classroom: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. The Modern Language Journal ( 103 )31, 551–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48 (1), 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., S. Li & F. Xiao. (2013). Production of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese: A developmental investigation in a study abroad context. Chinese as a Second Language Research Journal 2 1, 23–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., F. Xiao & S. Li. (2016). Development of pragmatic knowledge in L2 Chinese: Effects of intercultural competence and social contact on speech act production in a study abroad context. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (4), 775–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. & Li, S. (2019). Replication research in contextual and individual influences in pragmatic competence: Taguchi, Xiao & Li (2016) and Bordovi-Harlig & Bastos (2011). Language Teaching, 52 (1), 128–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2019). Individual Learner Considerations in SLA and L2 Pragmatics. In N. Taguchi, (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisitions and Pragmatics (pp. 429–443). Taylor and Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of task repetition on learners’ recognition and production of second language pragmatic chunks. Paper presented at the International Conference of Malaysian English Language Teaching Association, Selangor, Malaysia. June.
Van Dyke, A. & Acton, W. R. (2021). Spontaneous classroom engagement facilitating development of L2 pragmatic competence: A naturalistic study. Pedagogical Linguistics, 2665 (9581), 1–28.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2003). From Input to Output: A Teacher’s Guide to Second Language Acquisition. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vidal, C. P. & Shively, R. L. (2019). L2 Pragmatic Development in Study Abroad Settings. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics, (pp. 355–371). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walters, F. S. (2021). Some Considerations Regarding Validation in CA-Informed Oral Testing for the L2 Classroom. In S. Kunitz et al. (Eds.) Classroom-based Conversation Analytic Research, (pp. 383–404). Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P. & Gass, S. M. (2018). Individual Differences in Advanced Proficiency. In P. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 157–178). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, W., R. E. Case & Y. Wang. (2011). Pragmatic and grammatical competence, length of residence, and overall L2 proficiency. System, 37 1, 205–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Youn, S. J. (2015). Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32 (2), 199–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Task-based needs analysis of L2 pragmatics in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36 1, 86–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Interactional features of L2 pragmatic interaction in role-play speaking assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 54 ( 1 ), 201–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Managing proposal sequences in role-play assessment: Validity evidence of interactional competence across levels. Language Testing, ( 37 )11, 76–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar