Article published In:
Pedagogical LinguisticsVol. 3:2 (2022) ► pp.193–200
Reflections on applied cognitive corpus linguistics
This article is a response to the commentaries written in reaction to my target article “Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy: From rationale to applications”. It focuses on some issues raised by several commentators: the complexity of applying cognitive corpus linguistics in the language classroom; the question of authenticity in pedagogy; the link between input, intake and output; the place of the teacher and the researcher in applied cognitive corpus linguistics; and possible expansions of the paradigm. It concludes by underlining the importance of exchanges such as those found in this target issue.
Keywords: applied cognitive corpus linguistics, authenticity, input-intake-output, teacher-researcher, theoretical paradigms
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The complexity of applying cognitive corpus linguistics
- 3.Authenticity in pedagogy
- 4.From input to intake to output
- 5.The place of the teacher and the researcher
- 6.Expanding the paradigm
- 7.Conclusion
-
References
References (13)
Gilquin, G., Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S. (2022). Assessing EFL speech: A teacher-focused perspective. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research,
9
1.
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2015). Learner language. In D. Biber, & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 418–435). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
(2022). Using data-driven learning in language teaching. In A. O’Keeffe, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. Second edition (pp. 430–442). London: Routledge.
Kotze, H. (2022). Translation as constrained communication: Principles, concepts and methods. In S. Granger, & M.-A. Lefer (Eds.), Extending the scope of corpus-based translation studies (pp. 67–97). London: Bloomsbury.
Le Foll, E. (Forthcoming). “I’m putting some salt in my sandwich.”: The use of the progressive in EFL textbook conversation. In S. Flach, & M. Hilpert (Eds.), Broadening the spectrum of corpus linguistics: New approaches to variability and change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leech, G. (2011). Frequency, corpora and language learning. In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora. In honour of Sylviane Granger (pp. 7–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lo, M. L., & Marton, F. (2012). Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies,
1
(1), 7–22.
Madlener, K. (2015). Frequency effects in instructed second language acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Römer, U. (2005). Progressives, patterns, pedagogy: A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals,
26
(4), 435–450.
Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics,
21
(1), 3–25.
(2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willis, J. (1998). Concordances in the classroom without a computer: Assembling and exploiting concordances of common words. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 44–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.