Article published In:
Pedagogical Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Historical linguistics, the pronunciation of Latin and teaching of classical languages

Outcomes of two projects aimed at Slovenian pupils

ORCID logo | University of Ljubljana
 | University of Ljubljana
We present attempts at reforming the pronunciation of Latin in Slovenia, also analyzing — based on a survey on the use of pronunciation in primary and high schools — the reasons for the lack of their success. In addition, we discuss two related pedagogical projects that involved primary and secondary pupils. Our main conclusion is that the adherence to the traditional pronunciation makes it necessary to readdress the issue of how a more authentic way of Latin pronunciation is to be incorporated in the language instruction. One such attempt was made during the summer school, where we informed students about findings of modern historical linguistics concerning the phonological system of Classical Latin. In addition, we tried to adopt these findings in practice, by following them in reading a part of an authentic Latin text. Our results show that this approach to presenting the classical pronunciation of Latin can be an interesting and well-received part of Latin instruction.
Keywords: Latin, pronunciation, loanwords, historical linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Reforming the pronunciation of Latin in Slovenia
  • 3.The fate of the classical pronunciation
  • 4.Hiper! Super! Did you already know that you use Latin and Greek every day?
  • 5.An alternative way of introducing the “authentic” pronunciation of Latin
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 January 2025
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.24005.kav
References (22)
References
Adams, J. N. (2003). Bilingualism and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adema, S. (2020). Latin learning and instruction as a research field. Journal of Latin linguistics 18(1–2), 35–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, S. W. (1968). Vox Graeca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1978). Vox Latina. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aubelj, B. (1997). Antična imena po slovensko. Ljubljana: Modrijan.Google Scholar
Collins, A. (2012). The English pronunciation of Latin: its rise and fall. The Cambridge Classical Journal 581, 23–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gantar, K. (1979). Nekaj misli o pisavi antičnih imen in strokovnih izrazov. Arheološki vestnik 301, 548–558.Google Scholar
(1999). Vprašanja klasične in tradicionalne izgovarjave latinščine. Keria: Studia Latina et Graeca 1(1–2), 3–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, J. (2000). Vulgar Latin. Translated by Roger Wright. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. (2023). Starting to teach Latin. 2nd edition. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D. (2009). Greek. In: B. Comrie (Ed.), The world’s major languages, 2nd edition (pp 410–439). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2020). What is not so (E)strange about Greek as a Balkan Language. Keria: Studia Latina et Graeca 22(2), 57–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopitar, J. (1819). Über Alt- und Neugriechisch. Jahrbücher der Literatur 61, 123–153.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. E., & Robson, J. (2019). Staying the distance: Transforming Latin pedagogy at the Open University. Journal of Latin linguistics 18(1–2), 101–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlič Škerjanc, K. (1992). Avtentična in tradicionalna izgovorjava latinskega jezika: pro et contra. Vestnik / Društvo za tuje jezike in književnosti republike Slovenije 26(1–2), 103–116.Google Scholar
Petrounias, E. (2001). Η προφορά της αρχαίας ελληνικής στους νεότερους χρόνους. Ιn A. F. Christidis (Ed.), Ιστορία της Ελληνικής γλώσσας: Από τις αρχές έως την ύστερη αρχαιότητα (pp. 942–957). Θεσσαλονίκη: Ινστιτούτο Νεοελληνικών Σπουδών.Google Scholar
Reinhard, A. (2012). Classics Pedagogy in the Twenty-First Century: Technology. Classical World 106(1), 121–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sihler, A. L. (1995). New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockam, F. (1996). Veni, vidi, didici. Translated and adapted by Nataša Homar. Celovec: Mohorjeva.Google Scholar
Sušnik, P. (1972). Latinska vadnica za medicinske šole. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije.Google Scholar
Šašel, A. (1972). Fundamenta Latina 1. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Škrabec, S. (1904). Editorial. Cvetje z vrtov sv. Frančiška 21, 2.Google Scholar