The intuitive basis of implicature
Relevance theoretic implicitness versus Gricean implying
The notion of implicature was first introduced by Grice (1967, 1989), who defined it essentially as what is communicated less what is said. This definition contributed in part to the proliferation of a large number of different species of implicature by neo-Griceans. Relevance theorists have responded to this by proposing a shift back to the distinction between explicit and implicit meaning (corresponding to explicature and implicature respectively). However, they appear to have pared down the concept of implicature too much, ignoring phenomena which may be better treated as implicatures in their over-generalisation of the concept of explicature. These problems have their roots in the fact that explicit and implicit meaning intuitively overlap, and thus do not provide a suitable basis for distinguishing implicature from other types of pragmatic phenomena. An alternative conceptualisation of implicature based on the concept of implying with which Grice originally associated his notion of implicature is thus proposed. From this definition it emerges that implicature constitutes something else inferred by the addressee that is not literally said by the speaker. Instead, it is meant in addition to what the literally speaker says, and consequently, it is defeasible like all other types of pragmatic phenomena.
Keywords: Relevance theory, Grice, Implicature
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 June 2002
(2002a) The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 34.4: 361-402. BoP
(2002b) Privileged interactional interpretations. Journal of Pragmatics 34.8: 1003-1044. BoP
Bezuidenhout, Anne, & J. Cooper Cutting
(2002) The current state of (radical) pragmatics in the cognitive sciences. Mind and Language 17.1/2: 169-187. BoP
(1995) Quantity maxims and generalised implicature. Lingua 96: 213-244. BoP
(1998b) Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In Robyn Carston, & Seiichi Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 179-236. BoP
(2002) Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language 17.1/2: 127-148. BoP
Gibbs, Raymond Jr
(2000) Inferring what speakers say and what they mean. Paper presented at the Seventh International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
Gibbs, Raymond Jr., & Jessica Moise
(1992) 'Can you pass the salt?': A short-circuited implicature. Lingua 87: 103-135. BoP
(1999) Understanding what is said and what is implicated. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
(2002) What is said. Journal of Pragmatics 34.8: 969-991. BoP
in progress) Politeness implicature in Japanese. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland.
Horn, Laurence, & Samuel Bayer
(2000a) Conventional implicature, tone and procedural meaning . Paper presented at the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
(2000b) 'Non-Truth-Conditional' Meaning. Relevance and Concessives. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London.
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. BoP
(2000) Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalised Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. BoP
Nicolle, Steve, & Billy Clark
(1979) Generalized conversational implicature. Sophia Linguistica 5: 75-83. BoP
(2002) Mindreading and verbal communication. Mind and Language 17.1/2: 55-67. BoP
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco
(1999) The role of cognitive mechanisms in making inferences. Journal of English Studies (University of La Rioja) 1: 237-255. MetBib
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco, & Lorena Perez Hernandez
(2001) Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication, Sincronia (E-Journal of Culture Studies) (Fall volume). http://sincronia.cusch.udg.mx/fall01.htm
(2002) Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated. Nous 36.2: 228-248. BoP
Sperber, Dan, & Deirdre Wilson
(1995) Relevance. Communication and Cognition. (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell. MetBib
(2002) Pragmatics, modularity, and mind-reading. Mind and Language 17. 1/2: 3-23. BoP
(1999) Misunderstandings and explicit/implicit communication. Pragmatics 9.4: 487-517. BoP
Cited by 14 other publications
Hummadi, Ali Salman, Seriaznita Binti Mat Said, Rafi’ M. Hussein, Ahmed Abdulateef Sabti & Huda Abed Ali Hattab
Moriya, Tetsuharu & Kaoru Horie
Parvaresh, Vahid & Tahmineh Tayebi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.