Article published In:
Vol. 12:2 (2002) ► pp.117134
Ariel, Mira
(2002a) The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 34.4: 361-402. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Privileged interactional interpretations. Journal of Pragmatics 34.8: 1003-1044. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent
(1994) Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9.2: 124-162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001a) You don't say? Synthese 128.1/2: 15-44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Seemingly semantic intuitions. In Joseph Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. New York: Seven Bridges Press, pp. 21-33.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, Anne, & J. Cooper Cutting
(2002) Literal meaning, miminal propositions, and pragmatic processing. Journal of Pragmatics 34.4: 433-356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
(1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2000) Indicators and procedures: Nevertheless and but . Journal of Linguistics 361: 463-486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breheny, Richard
(2002) The current state of (radical) pragmatics in the cognitive sciences. Mind and Language 17.1/2: 169-187. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
(1988) Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In Ruth Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155-181.Google Scholar
(1995) Quantity maxims and generalised implicature. Lingua 961: 213-244. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 81: 61-88.Google Scholar
(1998a) Postscript (1995). In Asa Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics. Critical Concepts. Volume IV1.London: Routledge, pp. 464-479.Google Scholar
(1998b) Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In Robyn Carston, & Seiichi Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 179-236. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2000) Explicature and Semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 121: 1-44.Google Scholar
(2001) Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 131: 1-34.Google Scholar
(2002) Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language 17.1/2: 127-148. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
forthcoming) Thoughts and Utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logo
Davis, Wayne
(1998) Implicature. Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gauker, Christopher
(2001) Situated inference versus conversational implicature. Nous 35.2: 163-189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond Jr
(1999a) Interpreting what speakers say and implicate. Brain and Language 68.3: 466-485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999b) Speakers' intuitions and pragmatic theory. Cognition 69.3: 355-359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Inferring what speakers say and what they mean. Paper presented at the Seventh International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
Gibbs, Raymond Jr., & Jessica Moise
(1997) Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition 62.1: 51-74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
(1967) Logic and Conversation, William James Lectures.Google Scholar
(1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Groefsema, M
(1992) 'Can you pass the salt?': A short-circuited implicature. Lingua 871: 103-135. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Jennifer
(1999) Understanding what is said and what is implicated. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Hawley, Patrick
(2002) What is said. Journal of Pragmatics 34.8: 969-991. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
in progress) Politeness implicature in Japanese. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland.
Horn, Laurence, & Samuel Bayer
(1984) Short-circuited implicature: A negative contribution. Linguistics and Philosophy 71: 397-414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iten, Corrine
(2000a)  Conventional implicature, tone and procedural meaning . Paper presented at the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
(2000b) 'Non-Truth-Conditional' Meaning. Relevance and Concessives. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London.
Kandolf, Cindy
(1993) On the difference between explicatures and implicatures in relevance theory. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 161: 33-46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
(1989) A review of Relevance. Journal of Linguistics 25.2: 455-472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalised Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P.H
(1997) Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry
(1978) Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9. Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261-280.Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve, & Billy Clark
(1999) Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition 69.3: 337-354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noro, Ken
(1979) Generalized conversational implicature. Sophia Linguistica 51: 75-83.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira
(2001) When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78.2: 165-188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obana, Yasuko
(2000) Understanding Japanese. A Handbook for Learners and Teachers. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
(2000) Early communication: Beyond speech act theory. In Catherine Howell, Sarah Fish, & Thea Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Volume 2 . Sommerville, Mass: Cascadilla Press, pp. 571-582.Google Scholar
(2002) Mindreading and verbal communication. Mind and Language 17.1/2: 55-67. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
(1989) The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 41: 295-329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Direct Reference. From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2002) Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind and Language17.1/2: 105-126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco
(1998) Implicatures, explicatures and conceptual mappings. In Jose Luis Cifuentes (ed.), Estudios de Linguistica Cognitiva I. Alicante, Spain: University de Alicante, pp. 419-431.Google Scholar
(1999) The role of cognitive mechanisms in making inferences. Journal of English Studies (University of La Rioja) 11: 237-255.  MetBib DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco, & Lorena Perez Hernandez
(2001) Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication, Sincronia (E-Journal of Culture Studies) (Fall volume). [URL]Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerry
(1978) On testing for conversational implicature. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics Volume 9. Pragmatics . New York: Academic Press, pp. 281-297.Google Scholar
Saul, Jennifer
(2002) Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated. Nous 36.2: 228-248. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, & Deirdre Wilson
(1995) Relevance. Communication and Cognition. (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
(2002) Pragmatics, modularity, and mind-reading. Mind and Language 17. 1/2: 3-23. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Vicente, Begona
(1998) Against blurring the explicit/implicit distinction. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 111: 241-258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, & Dan Sperber
(1993) Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 901: 1-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Pragmatics and time. In Robyn Carston, & Seiichi Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1-22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Truthfulness and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 121: 215-257.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
(1999) Misunderstandings and explicit/implicit communication. Pragmatics 9.4: 487-517.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Davis, Wayne A.
2007. How normative is implicature. Journal of Pragmatics 39:10  pp. 1655 ff. DOI logo
Genovesi, Chris
2020. Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism. Journal of Pragmatics 157  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2007. The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39:1  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2009. Intention(ality) and the Conceptualization of Communication in Pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2012. Conversational Implicature. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2022. Utterance-final conjunctive particles and implicature in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Hummadi, Ali Salman, Seriaznita Binti Mat Said, Rafi’ M. Hussein, Ahmed Abdulateef Sabti & Huda Abed Ali Hattab
2020. Rhetorical Loss in Translating Prepositional Phrases of the Holy Qur’an. SAGE Open 10:1  pp. 215824402090209 ff. DOI logo
Moriya, Tetsuharu & Kaoru Horie
2015. The Neg-Raising Phenomenon as a product of grammaticalization. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid & Tahmineh Tayebi
2021. Taking offence at the (un)said:Towards a more radical contextualist approach. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Rahman, Abduwali & Wanzhi Xu
2023. Moderate semantic minimalism: an eclectic approach to trichotomy of meaning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo
Stadler, Stefanie
2018. Conventionalized politeness in Singapore Colloquial English. World Englishes 37:2  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Terkourafi, Marina
2021. Inference and Implicature. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Vergaro, Carla
2008. Concessive constructions in English business letter discourse. Text & Talk 28:1 DOI logo
Vergaro, Carla
2008. On the pragmatics of concessive constructions in Italian and English business letter discourse. MULT 27:3  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.