Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 12:3 (2002) ► pp. 273295
References
Adamson, Sylvia
(1995) From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: Stylisation and (de)subjectivisation as processes of language change. In D. Stein, and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195-224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bella, Spyridoula
(2001) Η δείξη στα Νέα Ελληνικά. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Athens.
Brinton, Laurel
(1995) Non-anaphoric reflexives in free indirect style: Expressing the subjectivity of the non-speaker. In D. Stein, and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151-172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christidis, Anastasios Ph
(1991) On the categorical status of particles: The case for holophrasis. Lingua 821: 53-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
(1966) Deictic categories in the semantics of 'come'. Foundations of Language 21: 219-227.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1975) The Santa Cruz lectures on deixis (1971) . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
(1982) Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R.J. Jarvella, and W. Klein (eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related subjects. New York: Wiley, pp. 31-59.Google Scholar
(1983) How to know whether you are coming or going. In G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis. Tubingen: Narr, pp. 219-227.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia
(1977) A study of the comings and goings ofthe speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English and Turkish. Kansas working papers in linguistics, Vol. 21: 61-94.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
(1997) The semantics of coming and going. Pragmatics 7.2: 147-162.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
(1964) Comparison and translation. In M.A.K. Halliday, M. Mcintosh, and P. Stevens (eds.), The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London and New York: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1-1: 5-38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol.2, Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Universals of construal. In J. Guentez, B. Kaiser, and C. Zoll (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 447-463.Google Scholar
(1997) Consciousness, construal and subjectivity. In M.I. Stamenov (ed.), Language structure, discourse and the access to consciousness. Advances in Consciousness Research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 49-75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12-2: 143-188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
(1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Marmaridou, Sophia A
(2000) Pragmatic meaning and cognition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A., and Philip Johnson-Laird
(1976) Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
(2001) Discourse analysis: Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pander Maat, Henk, and Ted Sanders
(2001) Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empirical study of language in use. Cognitive Linguistics 12-3: 247-273.Google Scholar
Rubba, Jo
(1996) Alternate grounds in the interpretation of deictic expressions. In E. Sweetser, and G. Fauconnier (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar . Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 227-261.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve, and Gilles Fauconnier
(1996) Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of mental space theory. In E. Sweetser, and G. Fauconnier (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-28.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Veloudis, Giorgos
(1977) Διήγησις Αλεξάνδρου του Μακδόνος (Narration of Alexander the Macedonian). Athens: Modern Greek Library.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
(1999) Understanding pragmatics. London, New York, Sydney, Auckland: Edward Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P., and Deborah Hill
(1995) When "go" means "come": Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6-2/3: 209-259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Susan
(1995) Subjectivity and experiential syntax. In D. Stein, and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151-172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Full-text

Deictic motion and the adoption of perspective in Greek
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

No author info given
2018.  In The Poetics of Time – Metaphors and Blends in Language and Literature [Figurative Thought and Language, 3], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.