Deictic motion and the adoption of perspective in Greek
In this paper we examine the semantics-pragmatics of the deictic motion verb erxome ‘come’ in central and extended uses. We argue that a detailed language-specific analysis of erxome and its systemic counterpart pijeno ‘go’ is necessary, since even at the level of basic appropriateness conditions, there are significant differences from other languages. Based on extensive corpus data, we further argue that in third-person discourse erxome is a conventional means of adopting perspective. In particular, we show that the factors which are relevant to the speaker’s/narrator’s choice to identify with a particular point of view are amenable to a principled description which relies both on discoursal parameters and text-sensitive generalizations. Motivating the adoption-of-perspective uses is a subjectification shift whereby the speaker’s presence at the goal of motion becomes increasingly more implicit. Our results, therefore, add to the study of deixis in natural languages, point to the existence of generalizations in the complex factors that underlie construal and highlight some of the cognitive mechanisms involved in meaning shifts.
References (30)
Adamson, Sylvia (1995) From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: Stylisation and (de)subjectivisation as processes of language change. In D. Stein, and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195-224.
Bella, Spyridoula (2001) Η δείξη στα Νέα Ελληνικά. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Athens.
Brinton, Laurel (1995) Non-anaphoric reflexives in free indirect style: Expressing the subjectivity of the non-speaker. In D. Stein, and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151-172.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christidis, Anastasios Ph. (1991) On the categorical status of particles: The case for holophrasis. Lingua 821: 53-82.
Fillmore, Charles (1966) Deictic categories in the semantics of 'come'. Foundations of Language 21: 219-227. BoP
Fillmore, Charles (1975) The Santa Cruz lectures on deixis (1971)
. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Fillmore, Charles (1982) Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R.J. Jarvella, and W. Klein (eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related subjects. New York: Wiley, pp. 31-59.
Fillmore, Charles (1983) How to know whether you are coming or going. In G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis. Tubingen: Narr, pp. 219-227.
Gathercole, Virginia (1977) A study of the comings and goings ofthe speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English and Turkish. Kansas working papers in linguistics, Vol. 21: 61-94.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1964) Comparison and translation. In M.A.K. Halliday, M. Mcintosh, and P. Stevens (eds.), The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London and New York: Longman. BoP
Langacker, Ronald (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. BoP
Langacker, Ronald (1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1-1: 5-38.
Langacker, Ronald (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol.2, Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald (1993) Universals of construal. In J. Guentez, B. Kaiser, and C. Zoll (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 447-463.
Langacker, Ronald (1997) Consciousness, construal and subjectivity. In M.I. Stamenov (ed.), Language structure, discourse and the access to consciousness. Advances in Consciousness Research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 49-75.
Langacker, Ronald (2001) Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12-2: 143-188.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP.
Lyons, John (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Miller, George A., and Philip Johnson-Laird (1976) Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Pander Maat, Henk, and Ted Sanders (2001) Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empirical study of language in use. Cognitive Linguistics 12-3: 247-273.
Rubba, Jo (1996) Alternate grounds in the interpretation of deictic expressions. In E. Sweetser, and G. Fauconnier (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar . Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 227-261.
Sweetser, Eve, and Gilles Fauconnier (1996) Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of mental space theory. In E. Sweetser, and G. Fauconnier (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-28. BoP
Veloudis, Giorgos (1977) Διήγησις Αλεξάνδρου του Μακδόνος (Narration of Alexander the Macedonian). Athens: Modern Greek Library.
Verschueren, Jef (1999) Understanding pragmatics. London, New York, Sydney, Auckland: Edward Arnold. BoP
Wilkins, David P., and Deborah Hill (1995) When "go" means "come": Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6-2/3: 209-259.
Wright, Susan (1995) Subjectivity and experiential syntax. In D. Stein, and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151-172.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.