A touch of class
The erasion of group-based social inequality as a hegemonic process in political discourse
This paper describes how political discourse, as manifested in the policy statements of two Flemish political parties which assign to themselves the epithet ‘social’, contributes to the erasion of group-based or class- related forms of social inequality. A brief comparison with the academic defense of ‘Third Way’ politics (in the work of Anthony Giddens) leads to the suggestion that we are witnessing a hegemonic process.
References
Bauman, Zygmunt
(
2001)
Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren
(
1992)
Het Belgische migrantendebat: De pragmatiek van de abnormalisering. Antwerpen: International Pragmatics Association.
BoP
Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren
(
1994)
Antiracisme. Antwerpen: Hadewijch.

Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren
(
1998)
Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.

Epstein, Steven A
(
2001)
Speaking of Slavery: Color, Ethnicity, & Human Bondage in Italy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.


Forrester, Viviane
(
2000)
Une étrange dictature. Paris: Fayard.

Giddens, Anthony
(
2000)
The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Verschueren, Jef
(
2002)
Democracy and diversity.
The School Field 13.6: 41-59.
BoP
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Ceuppens, Bambi
2006.
Allochthons, Colonizers, and Scroungers: Exclusionary Populism in Belgium.
African Studies Review 49:2
► pp. 147 ff.

Kalisz, Roman
2013.
A Concept of General Meaning: Selected Theories in Comparison to Selected Semantic and Pragmatic Theories.
Research in Language 11:3
► pp. 239 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.